A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis

Year 2013, , 47 - 70, 22.08.2013

Gonca Biltekin Musa Tüzüner

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167315

Abstract

This paper provides a simple introduction to event data analysis, a quantitative data collection and analysis approach that has been used extensively for compiling broad datasets of foreign policy and other international behaviors. The authors define the steps undertaken in creating the Turkish Foreign Affairs Event Dataset (TFAED). This pilot study, which uses a single news source and covers a 23-year period (1990-2013) of foreign affairs in Turkey, was completed to evaluate the feasibility, time, cost, and possible problems that might be encountered with a full-scope study. The paper describes the obstacles encountered during the pilot study’s initial phases and discusses a sample of the preliminary findings. The paper concludes with potential uses of the dataset. 

Keywords

Turkish foreign policy, Event data, Turkish foreign affairs, Quantitative methods

References

• Aras, Bülent, and Hakan Fidan. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 195-217.
• Atlı, Altay. “Businessmen as Diplomats: The Role of Business Associations in Turkey’s Foreign Economic Policy.” Insight Turkey 13, no.1 (2011): 109-128.
• Aydınlı, Ersel and Musa Tuzuner, “Quantifying intelligence cooperation: The United States International Intelligence Behavior (USIIB) dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 5 (2011): 673-682.
• Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Quantification of Turkey’s Foreign Affairs via Event Data.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantifying Security Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis in Turkey and the Greater Middle East, İstanbul, December 2-4, 2011.
• Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Time to Quantify Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Setting Standards for a Maturing International Relations Discipline” (forthcoming).
• Azar, Edward E. “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (1980): 143-152.
• Bacık, Gökhan. “Turkish-Israeli Relations after Davos: A View from Turkey.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 31- 41.
• Bond, D., and W. B. Vogele. “Profiles of International Hotspots.” Unpublished manuscript, 1995. Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://vranet.com/papers.html.
• Bond, Doug, Joe Bond, Churl Oh, J. Craig Jenkins, and Charles Lewis Taylor. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 6 (2003): 733-745.
• Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 47-65.
• Özcan, Mesut, and Ali Resul Usul. “Understanding the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Changes within Continuity, Is Turkey Departing From The West?” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Dış Politika 6, no. 21 (2010): 101-123.
• R Foundation for Statistical Computing . “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” http:// www.R-project.org/.
• R Project. “Events: Store and Manipulate Event Data,” http://CRAN.R- project.org/package=events.HYPERLINK.
• Renda, Kadri Kaan. “Turkey’s Neighbourhood Policy: An Emerging Complex Interdepence.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 89-108.
• Rucht, D., R. Koopmans, and F. Neidhardt, eds. Acts of Dissent. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
• Schrodt, Philip A., Shannon G. Davis, and Judy L. Weddle. “Political Science: KEDS - A Program for the Machine Coding of Event Data.” Social Science Computer Review 12, no. 3 (1994): 561-588.
• Schrodt, Phillip A. TABARI Textual Analysis by Augmented Replacement Instructions Version 0.8.4 Manual, 2012,
• Schrodt, Philip A., and Deborah J. Gerner. Analyzing International Event Data (2001/2012). http://eventdata.psu. edu/papers.dir/automated.html.
• Schrodt, Philip A., and David Van Brackle. “Automated Coding of Political Event Data” in Handbook of Computational Approaches to Counterterrorism, V.S. Subrahmanian (ed.) 2013, 23-49, Springer Science and Business Media, NY.
• Shellman, S. M. “Quantifying Violence and Nonviolence: Terrorism & Political Violence Events Data Sets.” Electronic Newsletter of the ECPR-SG on Extremism & Democracy 9, no. 2 (2008). Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.tufts.edu/~dart01/extremismanddemocracy/newsletter/Article7_4.html.
• Walker, Joshua. “Learning Strategic Depth: Implications of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy Doctrine.” Insight Turkey 9, no.3 (2007): 32-47.
• Yılmaz, Ömür. “Turkish Military: the Key to Credible Commitment to Democracy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, California, March 22, 2006. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100868_index.html.
• Yılmaz, Ömür. “The Kurdish Insurgency in Turkey: Pre- and Post-Ocalan.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago, February 28, 2007. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p179221_index.html.
• Yılmaz, Ömür. “Turkey Data Set.” Accessed August 19, 2011. http://web.ku.edu/~keds/data.html.
• Yonamine, James E. “Working with Event Data: A Guide to Aggregation Choices.” Unpublished paper. Accessed 25 April, 2013. http://jayyonamine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Working-with-Event-Data-A-Guide-to- Aggregation-Choices.pdf.