International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book

Year 2015, , 59 - 66, 09.01.2015

Seçkin Köstem

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167333

Cited By: 5

Abstract

Akif Okur and Hakan Övünç Ongur argue in Chapter 8 that Turkey’s troubled relationship with American hegemony has been established through the interaction of ideas, material opportunities, and institutions. Drawing attention to the discursive construction of Turkey’s

Keywords

-

International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

• Aktürk, Şener. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
• Aydınlı, Ersel, and Julie Matthews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory of Anatolia.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 4 (October 2008): 693-712.
• Aytaç, S. Erdem, and Ziya Öniş. “Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context: The Divergent Paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 1 (October 2014): 41-59.
• Checkel, Jeffrey. “Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits.” In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd Edition, edited by Beth A. Simmons, Thomas Risse, and Walter Carlsnaes, 220- 41. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
• Dunne, Tim, Lene Hansen, and Colin Wight. “The End of International Relations Theory?” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (September 2013): 405-25.
• Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policy, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
• Kayaoğlu, Turan. Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, Ottoman Empire and China. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
• -- . “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 10 (2010): 193- 217.
• Katzenstein, Peter, and Rudra Sil. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
• Moravcsik, Andrew. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
• Rumelili, Bahar. “Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation.” Review of International Studies 30, no. 1 (January 2004): 27-47.
• -- . “Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisinde Yerel-Görüşlülük ve Doğu’nun Özneselliği.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 6, no. 3 (Fall 2009): 45-71.
• Zarakol, Ayşe. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
• -- . “What Made the Modern World Hang Together: Socialisation or Stigmatisation?” International Theory 6, no. 2 (July 2014): 311-32.