BibTex RIS Cite

Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 79 - 88, 02.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167344

Abstract

Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 16-22. Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 222. Barry Buzan and Richard Little, “World History and the development of non-Western International Relations Theory,” in

References

  • Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  • Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia,” Review of International Studies 34 (2008): 693-712.
  • Balakrishnan, Rajagopal. International Law From Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. “World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations
  • Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 21-39.
  • Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 6.
  • Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 10.
  • Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 94-101. Theory.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 197-220. NY: Routledge.
  • Cox, Robert. “Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun.” In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. Rosenau and E. Czempiel, 132-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Hobson, John M. “What is at Stake in Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations? Transcending Chronofetishism and Tempocentrism in International Relations.” In Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by S. Hobden and J. M. Hobson, 3-41. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Kalpakian, Jack. “Ibn Khaldun’s Influence On Current International Relations Theory.” The Journal of North African Studies 13, no. 3 (2008): 363-76.
  • Say, Seyfi. İbn Haldun’un Düşünce Sistemi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı [Ibn Khaldun’s System of Thought and International Relations Theory]. İstanbul: İlk Harf Yayınları, 2012.
  • Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. “International Relations Theory and the Islamic Worldview.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 174-96. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. “Eurorcentrism and Its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science.” Sociological Bulletin 46, no. 1 (1997): 21-39.

Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 79 - 88, 02.01.2016
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167344

Abstract

References

  • Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  • Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia,” Review of International Studies 34 (2008): 693-712.
  • Balakrishnan, Rajagopal. International Law From Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. “World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations
  • Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 21-39.
  • Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 6.
  • Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 10.
  • Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 94-101. Theory.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 197-220. NY: Routledge.
  • Cox, Robert. “Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun.” In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. Rosenau and E. Czempiel, 132-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • Hobson, John M. “What is at Stake in Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations? Transcending Chronofetishism and Tempocentrism in International Relations.” In Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by S. Hobden and J. M. Hobson, 3-41. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Kalpakian, Jack. “Ibn Khaldun’s Influence On Current International Relations Theory.” The Journal of North African Studies 13, no. 3 (2008): 363-76.
  • Say, Seyfi. İbn Haldun’un Düşünce Sistemi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı [Ibn Khaldun’s System of Thought and International Relations Theory]. İstanbul: İlk Harf Yayınları, 2012.
  • Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. “International Relations Theory and the Islamic Worldview.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 174-96. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. “Eurorcentrism and Its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science.” Sociological Bulletin 46, no. 1 (1997): 21-39.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Engin Sune This is me

Publication Date January 2, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

Chicago Sune, Engin. “Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun”. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 5, no. 1 (January 2016): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167344.

Manuscripts submitted for consideration must follow the style on the journal’s web page.The manuscripts should not be submitted simultaneously to any other publication, nor may they have been previously published elsewhere in English. However, articles that are published previously in another language but updated or improved can be submitted. For such articles, the author(s) will be responsible in seeking the required permission for copyright. Manuscripts may be submitted via Submission Form found at: http://www.allazimuth.com/authors-guideline/. For any questions please contact: allazimuth@bilkent.edu.tr