The English School and Global IR – A Research Agenda

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 87 - 105, 19.01.2022

Filippo Costa Buranelli Simon F. Taeuber

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1020713

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the different ways in which the English School of International Relations (ES) can contribute to the broader Global IR research agenda. After identifying some of the shared concerns between the ES and Global IR, such as the emphasis placed on history and culture, the paper proceeds with discussing what the authors believe to be the areas in which the ES can align itself more closely with the ideas and values underpinning Global IR: a more thorough engagement with the origins of global international society rooted in dispossession, violence, and colonialism; a more localised and diverse understanding of ‘society’; a sharper and more grounded conceptualisation of ‘the state’ as a basic ontology; an embracement of the interpretivist principle of charity; and a problematisation of assumptions of ‘globality’ of international society. The paper concludes with a tentative research agenda, emphasising the value of fieldwork, local practices and languages, archives, and a theorisation of international society that is grounded in the very social contexts being investigated.

Keywords

English School, Global IR, Eurocentrism, locality, grounded theory

References

• Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.
• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. Taylor & Francis, 2009.
• ———. The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• ———. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction’.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287–312.
• ———. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years On’.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17, no. 3 (2017): 341–70.
• Ahrens, Bettina. “The European Union Between Solidarist Change and Pluralist Re-Enactment’.” In International Organization in the Anarchical Society, edited by Tonny Brems Knudsen and Cornelia Navari. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• Ahrens, Bettina, and Thomas Diez. “Solidarisation and Its Limits: The EU and the Transformation of International Society’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 341–55.
• Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. First. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000.
• Anderl, Felix, and Antonia Witt. “Problematising the Global in Global IR’.” Millennium 49, no. 1 (2020): 32–57.
• Bartelson, Jens. “Towards a Genealogy of ‘Society’ in International Relations’.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 4 (2015): 675–92.
• Bevir, Mark, and Ian Hall. “Interpreting the English School: History, Science and Philosophy’.” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 120–32.
• ———. “The English School and the Classical Approach: Between Modernism and Interpretivism’.” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 153–70.
• Bilgin, Pinar. How to Globalise IR? E-IR, 2018. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/04/22/how-to-globalise-ir/.
• Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Macmillan, 1977.
• Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon Press, 1984.
• Buranelli, Costa. “The English School and Regional International Societies: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections’.” In Regions in International Society. Brno Czech Republic: MUNI Press, 2014.
• Buranelli, Costa and Filippo. “Authoritarianism as an Institution? The Case of Central Asia’.” International Studies Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2020): 1005–16.
• ———. “Central Asian Regionalism or Central Asian Order? Some Reflections’.” Central Asian Affairs 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–26.
• ———. “‘Do You Know What I Mean?’ ‘Not Exactly’: English School, Global International Society and the Polysemy of Institutions’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 499–514.
• ———. “Global International Society, Regional International Societies and Regional International Organizations: A Dataset of Primary Institutions’.” In International Organisations in the Anarchical Society. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• ———. “Is the English School Still an Underexploited Resource? And Whither the English School? An Introduction’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 464–66.
• ———. “Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door: Russia, Central Asia and the Mediated Expansion of International Society’.” Millennium 42, no. 3 (2014): 817–36.
• Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
• ———. “Culture and International Society’.” International Affairs 86, no. 1 (2010): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00866.x.
• ———. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
• Buzan, Barry. Forthcoming. “Global Society: A Structural Account of Humankind Since the Ice Age,” n.d.
• Buzan, Barry, and Ana Gonzalez-Pelaez, eds. International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. 2009th ed. Basingstoke ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• Buzan, Barry, and Laust Schouenborg. Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
• Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems In World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
• Buzan, Barry, and Yongjin Zhang, eds. Contesting International Society in East Asia. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press, 2007.
• Charmaz, Kathy C. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. 1st ed. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006.
• Dadabaev, Timur. “Decolonizing Central Asian International Relations: Central Asia in Post-Colonial Age”.” In Cambridge Central Asia Forum in Collaboration with the Centre of Development Studies and GCRF COMPASS Project, 2020. https://centralasia.group.cam.ac.uk/events/DadabaevTalk.
• Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 2001.
• Deciancio, Melisa. “International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR’.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 106–19.
• Dunne, Tim, and Christian Reus-Smit, eds. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Falkner, Robert, and Barry Buzan. “The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2019): 131–55.
• Glaser, Barney G. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, 1978.
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
• Green, Daniel. “Improving upon ‘Expansion’: Metaphors to Shape the English School’s International History’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 474–76.
• Hinnebusch, Raymond. “The English School and the Periphery Regions: The Case of MENA and the Road Ahead’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 487–90.
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR?” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 149–51.
• ———. “Cultural Diversity within Global International Society’.” In Culture and Order in World Politics, edited by Andrew Phillips and Christian Reus-Smit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge, 2010.
• Lasmar, Jorge M., Danny Zahreddine, and Delber Andrade Gribel Lage. “Understanding Regional and Global Diffusion in International Law: The Case for a Non-Monolithic Approach to Institutions’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 470–96.
• Lees, Nicholas. “International Society Is to International System as World Society Is to ...? Systemic and Societal Processes in English School Theory’.” Journal of International Relations and Development 19, no. 3 (2016): 285–311.
• Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
• Liow, Joseph Chinyong. The Kinship Factor in International Relations: Kinship, Identity Construction, and Nation Formation in Indonesia-Malaysia Relations’. London School of Economics and Political Science, 2003.
• Navari, Cornelia. “Agents versus Structures in English School Theory: Is Co-Constitution the Answer?” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 249–67.
• ———. Theorising International Society - English School Methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Navari, Cornelia, and Daniel Green, eds. Guide to the English School in International Studies. 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
• Navari, Cornelia, and Tonny Brems Knudsen, eds. International Organizations in the Anarchical Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• Pardesi, Manjeet S. “Mughal Hegemony and the Emergence of South Asia as a ‘Region’ for Regional Order-Building’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2018): 276–301.
• Parrat, Charlotta Friedner, Kilian Spandler, and Joanne Yao. “The English School as a Theory and a Scholarly Community’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 483–86.
• Parrat, Friedner and Charlotta. “On the Evolution of Primary Institutions of International Society’.” International Studies Quarterly 61, no. 3 (2017): 623–30.
• Pasha, Mustapha Kemal. “Decolonizing the Anarchical Society’.” In The Anarchical Society At, 40:92–110. Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Pella, John Anthony. Africa and the Expansion of International Society: Surrendering the Savannah. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.
• Phillips, Andrew, and Christian Reus-Smit. Culture and Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Phillips, Andrew, and J.C. Sharman. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• Quayle, Linda. Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations - A Region-Theory Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
• Schouenborg, Laust. The Scandinavian International Society: Primary Institutions and Binding Forces, 1815-2010. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2012.
• Schulz, Carsten-Andreas. “Territorial Sovereignty and the End of Inter-Cultural Diplomacy along the ‘Southern Frontier’’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 3 (2019): 878–903.
• Sharma, Ananya. “Decolonizing International Relations: Confronting Erasures through Indigenous Knowledge Systems’.” International Studies 58, no. 1 (2021): 25–40.
• Spandler, Kilian. Regional Organizations in International Society: ASEAN, the EU and the Politics of Normative Arguing. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
• ———. “Regional Standards of Membership and Enlargement in the EU and ASEAN’.” Asia Europe Journal 16, no. 2 (2018): 183–98.
• Spruyt, Hendrik. “The World Imagined: Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies.” In LSE International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Stivachtis, Yannis, ed. “Interrogating Regional International Societies, Questioning the Global International Society’.” Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought 5, no. 3 (2015).
• Suganami, Hidemi, Madeline Carr, and Adam Humphreys, eds. The Anarchical Society at 40: Contemporary Challenges and Prospects. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Suzuki, Shogo, Yongjin Zhang, and Joel Quirk, eds. International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. 1st ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Taeuber, Simon F. “Reconstructing the Silk Road: Norm Contestation in Sino-European Relations in Times of the Belt and Road Initiative’.” Journal of Rising Powers and Global Governance 1, no. 1 (2020): 31–65.
• Terradas, Nicolás. “The Quest for Order in Anarchical Societies: Anthropological Investigations’.” International Studies Review 22, no. 1 (2020): 98–121.
• Tucker, Karen. “Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement’.” International Political Sociology 12, no. 3 (2018): 215–32.
• Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. The Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
• Vigezzi, Brunelli. “The British Committee and International Society’.” In Guide to the English School of International Studies, 2014.
• Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge, 1992.
• Weinert, Matthew S. “World Society and the Globality of IR’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 480–82.
• Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester University Press [for] the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1977.
• Williams, John. Ethics, Diversity, and World Politics: Saving Pluralism From Itself? Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Wilson, Peter. “The English School Meets the Chicago School: The Case for a Grounded Theory of International Institutions’.” International Studies Review 14, no. 4 (2012): 567–90.
• Yates, Robert. The English School and Postcolonial State Agency: Social Roles and Order Management in Southeast Asia and the Asia-Pacific’. International Theory, 2020.
• Zhang, Yongjin. “The Global Diffusion of the English School’.” In Guide to the English School of International Studies, 2014.