Power Shifts and Knowledge Production: India’s Rise and Scholarship in International Relations

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 2

Aksel B. Hvid Fabricio H. Chagas-bastos Peter Marcus Kristensen

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1638623

Abstract

While much scholarly attention has been paid to the ways in which the rise of powers like China and India may challenge the fundamentals of the world order, there little empirically grounded research on the relationship between the socio-political conditions driving upward power shifts (“risingness”) and knowledge production, particularly outside the Western core of the International
Relations discipline. We show in this article that Indian scholars are more likely to portray India as a “rising power” when publishing in mainstream journals than when contributing to Indian journals. Moreover, Indian scholars publishing in mainstream journals often engage with a discourse centred on Western reference points, specifically addressing the future of the liberal international
order. By contrast, Indian scholars publishing in Indian journals focus on issues relevant to the South Asian context, frequently emphasising India’s non-Western roots. Finally, while contributions to mainstream journals tend to frame India’s rising status predominantly from a Western, particularly American, perspective, contributions to Indian journals are more deeply rooted in India’s rich intellectual traditions.

Keywords

Sociology of knowledge, International Relations, rising powers, India, powerknowledge nexus

References

• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287–312.
• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory. New York: Routledge, 2010.
• Acharya, Amitav. “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West.” Millennium 39, no. 3 (2011): 619–637.
• Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–659.
• Agathangelou, Anna, and L. H. M. Ling. “The House of IR.” International Studies Review 6, no. 4 (2004): 21–50.
• Agnew, John. “Know-Where: Geographies of Knowledge of World Politics.” International Political Sociology 1, no. 2 (2007): 138–148.
• Alagappa, Muthiah. “Strengthening International Studies in India.” International Studies 46, no. 1–2 (2009): 7–35.
• Alejandro, Audrey. Western Dominance in International Relations? The Internationalization of IR in Brazil and India. New York: Routledge, 2018.
• Allison, Graham. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.
• Atkinson, David. In Theory and in Practice: Harvard’s Center for International Affairs, 1958–1983. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.
• Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 1, no. 3 (2000): 289–303.
• Bajpai, Kanti, and Siddarth Mallavarapu. International Relations in India. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2005.
• Bajpai, Kanti. “Add Five E’s to Make a Partnership.” The Washington Quarterly 24, no. 3 (2001): 83–94.
• Bajpai, Kanti. “Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations.” International Studies 46, no. 1–2 (2009): 109–128.
• Barkawi, Tarak, Christopher Murray, and Ayşe Zarakol. “The United Nations of IR: Power, Knowledge, and Empire in Global IR Debates.” International Theory 15, no. 3 (2023): 445–461.
• Basrur, Rajesh. “Modi’s Foreign Policy Fundamentals: A Trajectory Unchanged.” International Affairs 93, no. 1 (2017): 7–26.
• Basrur, Rajesh. “Nuclear Weapons and Indian Strategic Culture.” Journal of Peace Research 38, no. 2 (2001): 181–198.
• Basrur, Rajesh. “Scholarship on India’s International Relations.” International Studies 46, no. 1–2 (2009): 89–108.
• Behera, Navnita. “Globalization, Deglobalization, and Knowledge Production.” International Affairs 97, no. 5 (2021): 1579–1597.
• Behera, Navnita. “Re-Imagining IR in India.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 341–368.
• Behera, Navnita. International Relations in South Asia. London: SAGE, 2008.
• Bhattacharjee, Sukalpa. “Towards a Theory of Native Informant.” Economic and Political Weekly 36, no. 14–15 (2001): 1194–1198.
• Blaney, David, and Arlene Tickner. “Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR.” Millennium 45, no. 3 (2017): 293–311.
• Booth, Ken. “75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject’s Past—Reinventing Its Future.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski, 331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Buzan, Barry, and Amitav Acharya. Re-Imagining International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
• Buzan, Barry. “How and How Not to Develop IR Theory: Lessons from Core and Periphery.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 11, no. 4 (2018): 391–414.
• Çapan, Zeynep. “Being International and/or Global?” In Globalizing International Theory: The Problem with Western IR Theory and How to Overcome It, edited by A. Layug and John Hobson, 98-114. New York: Routledge, 2023.
• Carr, Edward H. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939. London: Macmillan, 1939.
• Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício, Alexandre Leite, and Jessica Maximo. “A Postcolonial Mapping of Indian IR Origins.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 40, no. 4 (2019): 434–450.
• Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício, and Peter Kristensen. “Mapping Quality Judgment in International Relations: Cognitive Dimensions and Sociological Correlates.” Perspectives on Politics (2025).
• Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício, Erica Resende, Faten Ghosn, and Debbie Lisle. “Navigating the Global South Landscape.” International Studies Perspectives 24, no. 4 (2023): 441–466.
• Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício. “The Challenge for the ‘Rest’: Insertion, Agency Spaces and Recognition in World Politics.” International Affairs 100, no. 1 (2024): 43–60.
• Chakrabarti, Shubhodeep. “Operational Deficiencies in India’s Defense Preparedness.” Jadavpur Journal of International Relations 17, no. 2 (2013): 153–183.
• Chan, Steve. Thucydides’s Trap? Historical Interpretation, Logic of Inquiry, and the Future of Sino-American Relations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2020.
• Chellaney, Brahma. “New Delhi’s Dilemma.” The Washington Quarterly 23, no. 3 (2000): 145–153.
• Chopra, P. N. “Looking Towards Asia in the Twenty-First Century.” India Quarterly 56, no. 3–4 (2000): 1–14.
• Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no. 2 (1981): 126–155.
• Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. New York: Routledge, 1994.
• Devare, Aparna. “Dialogical International Relations.” In Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Politics, edited by Olivia Rutazibwa and Robbie Shilliam, 385–399. New York: Routledge, 2018.
• Do, Thuy. “China’s Rise and the ‘Chinese Dream’ in International Relations Theory.” Global Change, Peace & Security 27, no. 1 (2015): 21–38.
• Dutta, Sujit. “Managing and Engaging Rising China.” The Washington Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2011): 127–144.
• El Shakry, Omnia. “Rethinking Arab Intellectual History: Epistemology, Historicism, Secularism.” Modern Intellectual History 18, no. 2 (2021): 547–572.
• Ergin, Murat, and Aybike Alkan. “Academic Neo-Colonialism in Writing Practices: Geographic Markers in Three Journals from Japan, Turkey and the US.” Geoforum 104 (2019): 259–266.
• Ghose, Arundhati. “Nuclear Weapons, Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Disarmament.” India Quarterly 65, no. 4 (2009): 431–440.
• Ghoshal, Debalina. “India’s Recessed Deterrence Posture.” The Washington Quarterly 39, no. 1 (2016): 159–170.
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. “Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy.” Transmodernity 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–38.
• Guilhot, Nicolas, ed. The Invention of International Relations Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
• Hobson, John. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
• Hoffmann, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60.
• Kapoor, Ilan. “Hyper-Self-Reflexive Development?” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 4 (2004): 627–647.
• Kaul, Vijay, and Tuhina Chowdhury. “India Stimulating Growth in Bay of Bengal Region.” South Asian Survey 25, no. 1 (2018): 102–128.
• Khan, Shahnaz. “Reconfiguring the Native Informant: Positionality in the Global Age.” Signs 30, no. 4 (2005): 2017–2035.
• Kristensen, Peter, and Ras Nielsen. “Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation.” International Political Sociology 7, no. 1 (2013): 19–40.
• Kristensen, Peter. “How Can Emerging Powers Speak? On Theorists, Native Informants, and Quasi-Officials in International Relations Discourse.” Third World Quarterly 36, no. 4 (2015): 637–653.
• Kristensen, Peter. “International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy.” International Studies Quarterly 62, no. 2 (2018): 245–259.
• Kristensen, Peter. “Revisiting the ‘American Social Science’—Mapping the Geography of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2015): 246–269.
• Kristensen, Peter. “States of Emergence, States of Knowledge: A Comparative Sociology of International Relations in China and India.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 3 (2019): 772–799.
• Kumari, Priya. “India as a Normative Power.” International Studies 51, no. 4 (2014): 180–194.
• Lamont, Michèle. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
• Lerner, Adam. “Collective Trauma and the Evolution of Nehru’s Worldview.” International History Review 41, no. 6 (2018): 1276–1300.
• Lohaus, Mathis, Wiebke Wemheuer-Vogelaar, and Olivia Ding. “Bifurcated Core, Diverse Scholarship.” Global Studies Quarterly 1, no. 4 (2021): 1–16.
• Long, David, and Brian Schmidt. Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2005.
• Long, William. A Buddhist Approach to International Relations. Cham: Springer, 2021.
• Maggio, Jay. “‘Can the Subaltern Be Heard?’: Political Theory, Translation, Representation, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.” Alternatives 32, no. 4 (2007): 419–443.
• Malone, David, C. Raja Mohan, and Srinath Raghavan. “India and the World.” In Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, edited by David Malone, C. Raja Mohan, and Srinath Raghavan, 3–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Mignolo, Walter. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26, no. 7–8 (2009): 149–181.
• Miller, Manjari. “The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 2 (2016): 211–238.
• Miller, Manjari. Why Nations Rise: Narratives and the Path to Great Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
• Mookerjea, Sourayan. “Native Informant as Impossible Perspective: Information, Subalternist Deconstruction and Ethnographies of Globalization.” Canadian Review of Sociology 40, no. 2 (2003): 125–151.
• Muni, S. D., and C. Raja Mohan. “Emerging Asia.” International Studies 41, no. 3 (2004): 313–333.
• Naidu, G. V. C. “India and Southeast Asia.” International Studies 47, no. 2–4 (2010): 285–304.
• Narlikar, Amrita, and Aruna Narlikar. Bargaining with a Rising India. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
• Ollapally, Deepa, and Rajesh Rajagopalan. “The Pragmatic Challenge to Indian Foreign Policy.” The Washington Quarterly 24, no. 2 (2011): 145–162.
• Oren, Ido. “International Relations Ideas as Reflections and Weapons of US Foreign Policy.” In The Sage Handbook of the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of International Relations, edited by
• Andreas Gofas, Inanna Hamati-Ataya, and Nicholas Onuf. London: SAGE, 2018.
• Ozkaleli, Ferit, and Umut Ozkaleli. “De-Worlding IR Theory.” Postcolonial Studies 25, no. 2 (2022): 192–209.
• Pan, Chengxin, and Emilian Kavalski. China’s Rise and Rethinking International Relations Theory. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2022.
• Pant, Girijesh. “Energy Security in Asia.” Strategic Analysis 31, no. 3 (2007): 523–542.
• Pant, Harsh, and Premesha Saha. “India, China, and the Indo-Pacific.” The Washington Quarterly 43, no. 4 (2020): 187–204.
• Pant, Harsh. “Modi’s Unexpected Boost to India-U.S. Relations.” The Washington Quarterly 37, no. 3 (2014): 93–112.
• Parmar, Inderjeet, and Shihui Yin. “American Foundations, Think Tanks and the Liberal International Order.” In Handbook on Think Tanks in Public Policy, edited by D. E. Abelson, B. Mulroney, S. K. Hudson, and C. J. Rastrick. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, 2021.
• Parmar, Inderjeet. “Transnational Elite Knowledge Networks: Managing American Hegemony in Turbulent Times.” Security Studies 28, no. 3 (2018): 532–564.
• Parmar, Inderjeet. Foundations of the American Century. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
• Rajan, M. S. “Golden Jubilee of the School of International Studies.” International Studies 42 (2005): 195–204.
• Shahi, Deepshika, and Gennaro Ascione. “Rethinking the Absence of Post-Western International Relations Theory in India.” European Journal of International Relations 22, no. 2 (2016): 313–334.
• Shahi, Deepshikha. “Foregrounding the Complexities of a Dialogic Approach to Global International Relations.” All Azimuth 9, no. 2 (2020): 163–176.
• Shahi, Deepshikha. Advaita as a Global International Relations Theory. New York: Routledge, 2018.
• Singh, Bawa, and Mohamad Arif Mir. “Geostrategic Significance of South Asia.” IUP Journal of International Relations 8, no. 3 (2014): 7–16.
• Smith, Steve. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48, no. 3 (2004): 499–515.
• Smith, Steve. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2, no. 3 (2000): 374–402.
• Smith, Steve. “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’.” International Studies Review 4, no. 2 (2002): 67–85.
• Song, Yoonjin. “The Landscape of Comparative Politics: Which Regions and Countries Have Had High Profiles in Comparative Politics Journals?” PS: Political Science & Politics 52, no. 2 (2019): 325–331.
• Spivak, Gayatri. Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea, edited by Rosalind C. Morris. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
• Sreenivasan, T. P. “Bringing India’s Dream to Fruition.” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 2 (2010): 169–179.
• Sridharan, Eswaran. “Where Is India Headed? Possible Future Directions in Indian Foreign Policy.” International Affairs 93, no. 1 (2017): 51–68.
• Su, Karen. “Translating Mother Tongues.” In Feminist Field: Ethnographic Insights, edited by Rae Bridgman, Sally Cole, and Heather Howard-Bobiwash, 33–53. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Thakur, Monika. “Navigating Multiple Identities: Decentering International Relations.” International Studies Review 23, no. 2 (2021): 409–433.
• Thoker, Parvaiz, and Bawa Singh. “The Emerging China, Pakistan, and Russia Strategic Triangle.” Jadavpur Journal of International Relations 21, no. 1 (2017): 61–83.
• Tickner, Arlene, and Ole Wæver, eds. International Relations Scholarship Around the World. New York: Routledge, 2009.
• Tickner, Arlene. “Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 627–646.
• Tickner, Arlene. “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.” Millennium 32, no. 2 (2003): 295–324.
• Van der Pijl, Kees. The Discipline of Western Supremacy. Vol. 3. London: Pluto Press, 2014.
• Vivekanandan, Jayashree. Interrogating International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2012.
• Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687–727.
• Wang, Hung-Jen. The Rise of China and Chinese International Relations Scholarship. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013.