BibTex RIS Cite

THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Year 2005, Volume: 4 Issue: 1&2, 1 - 30, 16.06.2005

Ömer Çaha

Abstract

THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE
OF TURKEY

Keywords

-

Year 2005, Volume: 4 Issue: 1&2, 1 - 30, 16.06.2005

Ömer Çaha

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ömer Çaha This is me

Publication Date June 16, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 4 Issue: 1&2

Cite

APA Çaha, Ö. (2005). THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 4(1&2), 1-30.
AMA Çaha Ö. THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. June 2005;4(1&2):1-30.
Chicago Çaha, Ömer. “THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 4, no. 1&2 (June 2005): 1-30.
EndNote Çaha Ö (June 1, 2005) THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 4 1&2 1–30.
IEEE Ö. Çaha, “THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY”, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, vol. 4, no. 1 & 2, pp. 1–30, 2005.
ISNAD Çaha, Ömer. “THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 4/1 & 2 (June 2005), 1-30.
JAMA Çaha Ö. THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2005;4:1–30.
MLA Çaha, Ömer. “THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, vol. 4, no. 1&2, 2005, pp. 1-30.
Vancouver Çaha Ö. THE IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2005;4(1&2):1-30.