Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society

Year 2015, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 54 - 73, 11.01.2016

Abstract

This article aims to contribute
to the discourse of Euroscepticism in Turkish civil society by examining the
underlying dynamics of the phenomenon among leftist groups. Methodologically,
semi-structured qualitative interviews with and surveys of Civil Society
Organisation (CSO) leaders and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) are applied.
Compared to business organisations, a large part of the trades unions have a
cautious approach towards European integration. Generally, the leftist leaders
do not perceive the EU process strategically or as a political opportunity
structure to gain influence, but predominately more ideologically, as the
spread of neoliberal free market policies that create an anti-labour
environment

References

  • Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, “Globalization, Civil Society and Citizenship in Turkey: Actors, Boundaries and Discourses.” Citizenship Studies 7 (2003): 221
  • Romain Pasquier and Julien Weisbein, “L’Europe au microscope du local. Manifeste pour une sociologie politique de l’intégration communautaire.” Politique européenne 12 (2004): 13
  • Hayat Kabasakal and Muzaffer Bodur, “Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon.” in Culture and Leadership Across the World: The Globe Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies, edited by Chhokar Jagdeep, Felix Brodbeck and Robert House. London: Routledge(2007): 835-875.
  • It is largely believed that the EU accession process has been a crucial tool in the democratisation and modernisation of the country. Nevertheless, many civil society leaders question this assertion.
  • Ruud Koopmans, “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates.” European Journal of Political Research 46(2007): 183-210.
  • Thomas Diez, “Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse.” Manuscript for Journal of European Policy 6 (1999):4.
  • To illustrate, as Henderson (2001:4) suggests for the post-communist states, opposing attitudes towards the EU-membership are associated with a scepticism to modernisation and post-communist economic reform. Hence, it is more common among the losers of the transformation process.
  • Gary Marks and Marco Steenbergen, 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2004)
  • Donatella Della Porta and Manuela Caiani, Social Movements and Europeanization, (Oxford University Press: Oxford Della Porta 2009)
  • Patrick Chamorel, “Anti-Europeanism and Euroskepticism in the United States.” in Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by Thomas L. Ilgen. London: AshgateChamorel (2006): 163-193
Year 2015, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 54 - 73, 11.01.2016

Abstract

References

  • Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, “Globalization, Civil Society and Citizenship in Turkey: Actors, Boundaries and Discourses.” Citizenship Studies 7 (2003): 221
  • Romain Pasquier and Julien Weisbein, “L’Europe au microscope du local. Manifeste pour une sociologie politique de l’intégration communautaire.” Politique européenne 12 (2004): 13
  • Hayat Kabasakal and Muzaffer Bodur, “Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon.” in Culture and Leadership Across the World: The Globe Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies, edited by Chhokar Jagdeep, Felix Brodbeck and Robert House. London: Routledge(2007): 835-875.
  • It is largely believed that the EU accession process has been a crucial tool in the democratisation and modernisation of the country. Nevertheless, many civil society leaders question this assertion.
  • Ruud Koopmans, “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates.” European Journal of Political Research 46(2007): 183-210.
  • Thomas Diez, “Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse.” Manuscript for Journal of European Policy 6 (1999):4.
  • To illustrate, as Henderson (2001:4) suggests for the post-communist states, opposing attitudes towards the EU-membership are associated with a scepticism to modernisation and post-communist economic reform. Hence, it is more common among the losers of the transformation process.
  • Gary Marks and Marco Steenbergen, 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2004)
  • Donatella Della Porta and Manuela Caiani, Social Movements and Europeanization, (Oxford University Press: Oxford Della Porta 2009)
  • Patrick Chamorel, “Anti-Europeanism and Euroskepticism in the United States.” in Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by Thomas L. Ilgen. London: AshgateChamorel (2006): 163-193
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Can Büyükbay This is me

Publication Date January 11, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Büyükbay, C. (2016). Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 54-73.
AMA Büyükbay C. Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. January 2016;14(3):54-73.
Chicago Büyükbay, Can. “Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 14, no. 3 (January 2016): 54-73.
EndNote Büyükbay C (January 1, 2016) Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 14 3 54–73.
IEEE C. Büyükbay, “Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society”, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 54–73, 2016.
ISNAD Büyükbay, Can. “Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 14/3 (January 2016), 54-73.
JAMA Büyükbay C. Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2016;14:54–73.
MLA Büyükbay, Can. “Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, no. 3, 2016, pp. 54-73.
Vancouver Büyükbay C. Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2016;14(3):54-73.