Deconstructing the Neoliberal Character of the European Union: A Major Source of Leftist Dissent Over the EU in Turkish Civil Society
Abstract
This article aims to contribute
to the discourse of Euroscepticism in Turkish civil society by examining the
underlying dynamics of the phenomenon among leftist groups. Methodologically,
semi-structured qualitative interviews with and surveys of Civil Society
Organisation (CSO) leaders and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) are applied.
Compared to business organisations, a large part of the trades unions have a
cautious approach towards European integration. Generally, the leftist leaders
do not perceive the EU process strategically or as a political opportunity
structure to gain influence, but predominately more ideologically, as the
spread of neoliberal free market policies that create an anti-labour
environment
Keywords
Neoliberalism Euroscepticism Civil Society European Integration Critical Discourse Analysis
References
- Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, “Globalization, Civil Society and Citizenship in Turkey: Actors, Boundaries and Discourses.” Citizenship Studies 7 (2003): 221
- Romain Pasquier and Julien Weisbein, “L’Europe au microscope du local. Manifeste pour une sociologie politique de l’intégration communautaire.” Politique européenne 12 (2004): 13
- Hayat Kabasakal and Muzaffer Bodur, “Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon.” in Culture and Leadership Across the World: The Globe Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies, edited by Chhokar Jagdeep, Felix Brodbeck and Robert House. London: Routledge(2007): 835-875.
- It is largely believed that the EU accession process has been a crucial tool in the democratisation and modernisation of the country. Nevertheless, many civil society leaders question this assertion.
- Ruud Koopmans, “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates.” European Journal of Political Research 46(2007): 183-210.
- Thomas Diez, “Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse.” Manuscript for Journal of European Policy 6 (1999):4.
- To illustrate, as Henderson (2001:4) suggests for the post-communist states, opposing attitudes towards the EU-membership are associated with a scepticism to modernisation and post-communist economic reform. Hence, it is more common among the losers of the transformation process.
- Gary Marks and Marco Steenbergen, 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2004)
- Donatella Della Porta and Manuela Caiani, Social Movements and Europeanization, (Oxford University Press: Oxford Della Porta 2009)
- Patrick Chamorel, “Anti-Europeanism and Euroskepticism in the United States.” in Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by Thomas L. Ilgen. London: AshgateChamorel (2006): 163-193
Abstract
References
- Fuat Keyman and Ahmet İçduygu, “Globalization, Civil Society and Citizenship in Turkey: Actors, Boundaries and Discourses.” Citizenship Studies 7 (2003): 221
- Romain Pasquier and Julien Weisbein, “L’Europe au microscope du local. Manifeste pour une sociologie politique de l’intégration communautaire.” Politique européenne 12 (2004): 13
- Hayat Kabasakal and Muzaffer Bodur, “Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multifaceted Phenomenon.” in Culture and Leadership Across the World: The Globe Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies, edited by Chhokar Jagdeep, Felix Brodbeck and Robert House. London: Routledge(2007): 835-875.
- It is largely believed that the EU accession process has been a crucial tool in the democratisation and modernisation of the country. Nevertheless, many civil society leaders question this assertion.
- Ruud Koopmans, “Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanized public debates.” European Journal of Political Research 46(2007): 183-210.
- Thomas Diez, “Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse.” Manuscript for Journal of European Policy 6 (1999):4.
- To illustrate, as Henderson (2001:4) suggests for the post-communist states, opposing attitudes towards the EU-membership are associated with a scepticism to modernisation and post-communist economic reform. Hence, it is more common among the losers of the transformation process.
- Gary Marks and Marco Steenbergen, 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2004)
- Donatella Della Porta and Manuela Caiani, Social Movements and Europeanization, (Oxford University Press: Oxford Della Porta 2009)
- Patrick Chamorel, “Anti-Europeanism and Euroskepticism in the United States.” in Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by Thomas L. Ilgen. London: AshgateChamorel (2006): 163-193
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 11, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 14 Issue: 3 |