Liman Sürdürülebilirliği ve Dirençliliğinin SWOT ve PESTEL Analizleri ile Değerlendirilmesi: Haydarpaşa, Berbera ve İskenderiye Limanları Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu çalışma, farklı coğrafi, ekonomik ve kurumsal bağlamlara sahip Haydarpaşa (Türkiye), Berbera (Somali) ve İskenderiye (Mısır) limanlarının sürdürülebilirlik ve dirençlilik performanslarını karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir. Araştırmada nitel yöntem benimsenmiş; akademik literatür, uluslararası kuruluş raporları ve liman otoritelerinin yayımladığı ikincil veriler kullanılmıştır. Limanların iç kapasiteleri ve dış çevresel koşulları, SWOT ve PESTEL analizleri aracılığıyla bütüncül bir çerçevede değerlendirerek uzman görüşleri Etki-Olasılık-Güven (IPC) skorlarıyla sayısallaştırılmıştır. Bulgular, Haydarpaşa Limanı’nın kentsel baskılar ve afet riskleri nedeniyle yapısal kırılganlıklar taşıdığını; Berbera Limanı’nın yüksek büyüme potansiyeline rağmen kurumsal kapasite ve çevresel yönetim açısından gelişime ihtiyaç duyduğunu; İskenderiye Limanı’nın ise yüksek ticaret hacmi ve güçlü kurumsal yapısına karşın iklim değişikliğine bağlı risklere karşı savunmasız olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, limanların sürdürülebilirlik ve dirençlilik stratejilerinin tek tip yaklaşımlar yerine coğrafi ve kurumsal bağlama özgü politikalarla geliştirilmesi gerektiğini vurgulamakta ve liman yönetimine yönelik politika önerileri sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilirlik ve Dirençlilik
• Liman Yönetimi
• Haydarpaşa Limanı
• Berbera Limanı
• İskenderiye Limanı
• SWOT ve PESTEL Analizleri.

Evaluation of Port Sustainability and Resilience through SWOT and PESTEL Analyses: A Comparative Study of the Ports of Haydarpaşa, Berbera, and Alexandria

Öz

This study comparatively examines the sustainability and resilience performance of the ports of Haydarpaşa (Türkiye), Berbera (Somalia), and Alexandria (Egypt), which operate within distinct geographical, economic, and institutional contexts. A qualitative research methodology is adopted, drawing on academic literature, reports from international organizations, and secondary data published by port authorities. The internal capacities and external environmental conditions of the ports are evaluated within an integrated framework using SWOT and PESTEL analyses, and expert assessments are quantified through Impact-Probability-Confidence (IPC) Scores. The findings indicate that the Port of Haydarpaşa exhibits structural vulnerabilities due to urban pressures and disaster risks; that the Port of Berbera, despite its high growth potential, requires further development in terms of institutional capacity and environmental management; and that the Port of Alexandria, while benefiting from high trade volumes and a strong institutional structure, remains vulnerable to risks associated with climate change. The study emphasizes that port sustainability and resilience strategies should be developed through context-specific policies rather than uniform approaches and offers policy recommendations for port management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainability & Resilience
• Port Management
• Port of Haydarpaşa
• Port of Berbera
• Port of Alexandria
• SWOT and PESTEL Analyses.

Kaynakça

1. Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., … Kapros, S. (2014). Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.932926
2. Akyıldız, H., Mentes, A., & Bayraktarkatal, E. (2025). A strategic management perspective and sustainability of smart port facilities in Turkey. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, Advance online publication.
3. Alexandria Port Authority. (2025). About Port Authority of Alexandria & Dekheila. https://apa.gov.eg/en, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
4. Alpar, B., Incaz, S., Unlu, S. (2007). Vulnerability of Haydarpasa Port, Turkey, 8th International Conference on the Mediterranean Coastal Environment, Alexandria, Kanada, 13-17 Kasım 2007, ss.463-465.
5. Asariotis, R., Monioudi, I. N., Mohos Naray, V., Velegrakis, A. F., Vousdoukas, M. I., Mentaschi, L., & Feyen, L. (2024). Climate change and seaports: hazards, impacts and policies and legislation for adaptation. Anthropocene Coasts 7(1), 14.
6. Avcı, M. (2020). Haydarpaşa liman bölgesindeki gemi kaynaklı emisyonların incelenmesi ve hava kalitesi ölçüm sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Gemi İnşaatı ve Gemi Makineleri Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi, Tez No: 619698.
7. Britannica Editors (BE) (2025). Berbera. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Berbera, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
8. Demirci, M. (2011). İstanbul limanları (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi.

9. DP World. (2021). DP World and Somali open new terminal at Berbera Port. https://www.dpworld.com/en/news/dp-world-and-Somali-open-new-terminal-at-berbera-port-announce-second-phase-expansion-and-break-ground-for-economic-zone, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025)
10. DP World. (2024). Sustainability report 2024 (pp. 42–43). https://dpw01.sitecorecontenthub.cloud/api/public/content/c597c148ab114832bb9066ae897bcbe5?v=a0a670fe, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025)
11. Egyptian Ministry of Transport (EMT) (2023). Maritime Transport & Logistics Sector, https://www.mts.gov.eg/en, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
12. Egyptian Sea Ports. Alexandria Port (APA) (2021) https://www.egymar.com.eg/ports. (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025)
13. Elhussieny, M., Kassar, A., Tonbol, K., (2024). Assessing the Readiness and Awareness of Key Stakeholders in the Egyptian Maritime Industry to Implement Smart Green Port Practices: A Case Study of Alexandria Port," Blue Economy: Vol:2: Iss:2 Article:8. https://doi.org/10.57241/2805-2994.1033.
14. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2021). Alexandria Green City Action Plan. https://www.ebrdgreencities.com/assets/Alexandria-Green-City-Action-Plan-english.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
15. European Union Agency for Asylum. (EUAA) (2025). COI report – Somalia: Country focus. https://www.euaa.europa.eu/publications/coi-report-somalia-country-focus, (Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 2025)
16. Frenkel, M. (2014). Medieval Alexandria–Life in a Port City. Al-Masaq, 26(1), 5-35.
17. Guler, H. G., Arikawa, T., Oei, T., & Yalciner, A. C. (2015). Performance of rubble mound breakwaters under tsunami attack, a case study: Haydarpasa Port, Istanbul, Turkey. Coastal Engineering, 104, 43-53.
18. Hussein, K. N. M. (2021). Development of sustainable port supply chain integration in Egypt (Doctoral dissertation, World Maritime University).
19. IAPH. (2021). Risk and Resilience Guidelines for Ports. International Association of Ports and Harbors, https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/IAPH-Risk-and-Resilience-Guidelines-for-Ports-BD.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 2026).
20. Ibrahim, I., Jalil, S.A., Abdul Rasam, A.R., (2025) Benchmarking analysis for sustainability practices of Green Port Initiatives at Northport (Malaysia) Berhad with other selected port in urban future development. Built Environment Journal, 22 (SI): 26. pp. 356-371. ISSN 2637-0395.
21. ITAD (2025). Evaluating the impact of BII's investment in ports in Somaliland: Insights from DPWorld Berbera. Brighton: Itad.
22. JICA Study Team. (2008).The study on multımodal transport and logistics system of the eastern mediterranean region and master plan in the arab republic of egypt. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11893450_01.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
23. Kaamoush, M., El-Sayeh, M. & Omar, M.Y (2025). Observing air quality in Egypt’s Alexandria port based on the consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown. Discov Sustain, 6(1), 699.
24. Kemerci, B. (2016). Örnek Gemi Geri Dönüşüm Tesisi Geliştirilmesi-Türkiye Örneği. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
25. Koldemir, B., Kahraman, C. (2020). Ulaşım ve ticaret coğrafyası açısından İstanbul limanları. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(76), 1931–1949.
26. Lam, J. S. L., Li, K. X. (2019). Green port marketing for sustainable growth and development. Transport Policy, 84, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.04.011
27. Mazzarino, M., Rubini, L. (2019). Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study. Sustainability, 11(17), 4580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174580
28. McKenzie, J., & Moorey, P. R. S. (2007). The Architecture of Alexandria and Egypt, c. 300 BC to AD 700 (Vol. 63). Yale University Press.
29. OECD (2013). The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: The Case of Rotterdam / Amsterdam theNetherlands.https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2013/05/the-competitiveness-of-global-port-cities-the-case-of-rotterdam-amsterdam-the-netherlands_g17a22b5/5k46pghnvdvj-en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
30. Öndeş, O. (2013). Vapur Donatanları ve Acenteleri Tarihi, İMEAK Deniz Ticaret Odası Yayınları: 91, İstanbul. ISBN: 978-605-137-327-0, https://www.vda.org.tr/upload/tarife/VDA-TARIHI.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 2025)
31. Port of Singapore Authority. (2021). PSA sustainability report 2021. PSA International, (Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 2025)
32. Port Technology. (2025). DP World enhances East Africa link with Berbera route. https://www.porttechnology.org/dp-world-enhances-east-africa-link-with-berbera-route/ (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
33. Rius, A. (2022) The AfCFTA and the Berbera Corridor: opportunities for impact on Somaliland’s economy. ODI Report. London: ODI, https://media.odi.org/documents/AfCFTA_and_Berbera_Corridor_Somaliland_PDF.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
34. Schipper, C. A., Vreugdenhil, H., De Jong, M. (2017). A sustainability assessment of ports and port-city plans: Comparing ambitions with achievements, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,Volume 57, Pages 84-111, ISSN 1361-9209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.017.
35. Sharaan, M., Ibrahim, M. G., Moubarak, H., ElKut, A. E., Romya, A. A., Hamouda, M., Soliman, A., & Iskander, M. (2024). A qualitative analysis of climate impacts on Egyptian ports: Stakeholder perspectives and adaptation strategies. Sustainability, 16(3), 1015.
36. TCDD. (2025). Haydarpaşa Limanı kapasite raporu. https://www.tcdd.gov.tr/en/haydarpasa-port, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
37. Trading Economics (TE). (2024). Egypt GDP. https://tradingeconomics.com/egypt/gdp-growth, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2025).
38. Twrdy, E., Zanne, M. (2020). Improvement of the sustainability of ports logistics by the development of innovative green infrastructure solutions. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 539-546.
39. UNCTAD. (2022). Review of Maritime Transport 2022. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2022(Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 2026).
40. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2008). UNCTAD transport newsletter (pp. 2–3, 6–7). https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/posdtetibm17.en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 2025).
41. United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2019). Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea pursuant to Security Council resolution 2111 (2013) (S/2019/858). https://docs.un.org/en/S/2019/858, (Erişim Tarihi: Aralık 2025).
42. World Bank. (2020). Enhancing the climate resilience of ports and harbours. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/34365
43. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.