SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR ÜRETİM: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 439 - 469, 25.09.2023

Damla Çevik Aka

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1272528

Abstract

Çalışmada sürdürülebilir üretim araştırmalarının kapsamını ve gelişimini belgelemek; etkili dergileri, yazarları ve belgeleri belirlemek, ilgili alanının entelektüel yapısını analiz etmek ve konu hakkında ortaya çıkan temaları ve araştırma boşluklarını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırma sürdürülebilir üretim hakkında Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanından 1987-2022 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 1264 makaleyi bibliyometrik analize tabi tutmuştur. Veri analizi ve görselleştirme için R programı içinde Biblio-metrix paket kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada hem sürdürülebilir üretim literatürü için tanımlayıcı analizler hem de mevcut ve gelecekteki trendleri belirleyebilmek için anahtar kelime analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, sürdürülebilir üretim ile ilgili literatürün oldukça yeni olduğunu ve her yıl çalışma hacminin arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Dergilerin, yazarların ve belgelerin alıntı analizleri incelendiğinde, yeni büyüyen bir literatür için sonuçların yüksek düzeyde bilimsel içerik sağladığı görülmektedir.

Keywords

Sürdürülebilir İmalat, Sürdürülebilir Üretim, Literatür Taraması, Bibliyometrik, Biblioshiny

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW

Abstract

The purpose of this document is to determine the scope of studies on sustainable manufacturing, to identify influential journals, authors and documents, to analyze the intellectual structure of the relevant field, and to reveal emerging themes and research gaps on the subject. In this study, 1264 articles published between 1987-2022 from the Web of Science database about sustainable manufacturing were subjected to bibliometric analysis. The Biblio-metrix package in the R program was used for data analysis and visualization. In the study, both descriptive analyzes for sustainable production literature were used, and keyword analyzes were used to determine current and future trends. The findings reveal that the literature on sustainable manufacturing is quite new. Examining citation analyzes of journals, authors, and documents reveals that the results provide a high level of scientific content for a newly growing literature.

Keywords

Sustainable Manufacturing, Sustainable Production, Literature Review, Bibliometric, Biblioshiny

References

• Abbasi, M., & Nilsson, F. (2012). Themes and challenges in making supply chains environmentally sustainable. Supply Chain Management, 17(5), 517–530.
• Ageron, B., Gunesekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 168-182.
• Ahmad, S., & Wong, K.Y. (2019). Development of weighted triple-bottom line sustainability indicators for the Malaysian food manufacturing industry using the Delphi method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 1167–1182.
• Bag, S., & Pretoriun, J.H.C. (2020). Relationships between Industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: Proposal of a research framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 864-898.
• Bastas, A. (2021). Sustainable manufacturing technologies: A systematic review of latest trends and themes. Sustainability, 13(8), 1-22. doi:10.3390/su13084271.
• Bhanot, N., Rao, P.V., & Deshmukh, S.G. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4412-4439.
• Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., & Dhir, A. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 1-17.
• Bilge, P., Emec, S., Seliger, G., & Jawahir, I.S. (2017). Mapping and integrating value creation factors with life-cycle stages for sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 61, 28-33.
• Borregan-Alvarado, J., Alvarez-Meaza, I., Cilleruelo-Carrasco, E., & Garechana-Anacabe, G. (2020). A bibliometric analysis in industry 4.0 and advanced manufacturing: What about the sustainable supply chain?. Sustainability, 12(19), 7840.
• Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.
• Cabeza, L.F., Frazzica, A., Chàfer, M., Vérez, D., & Palomba, V. (2020). Research trends and perspectives of thermal management of electric batteries: Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Energy Storage, 32, 1-14.
• Caterino, M., Rinaldi, M., Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R., & Bottani, E. (2022). Research trends in clean, green and sustainable manufacturing: A bibliometric review. IFAC PapersOnLine, 55(10), 2425–2430.
• Cevik Aka, D. (2022) Sürdürülebilir üretim paradigması. In M. Sayılgan (Ed.), Dijital dönüşüm ve sürdürülebilirlik güncel konular ve tartışmalar (p. 361-379). İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınları.
• Chai, S.H., Wang, H.P., Liang, Y., & Xu, B.Q. (2007). Sustainable production of acrolein: investigation of solid acid-base catalysts for gas-phase dehydration of glycerol. Green Chemistry, 10, 1130-36.
• Chan, F., Li, N., Chung, S.H., & Saadat, M. (2017). Management of sustainable manufacturing systems-a review on mathematical problems. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 1148-1163.
• Chen, W.Q., Hauschild, M.Z., Huang, B., Kara, S., Sutherland, J.W., & Umeda, Y. (2022). Life cycle engineering and sustainable manufacturing for net-zero targets and environmental sustainability. Resources, conservation and recycling, 186, 1-2.
• Ching, N.T., Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P., & Asadi, S. (2022). Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: A systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. Jorunal of Cleaner Production, 334, 1-18.
• Dervis, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160.
• Despeisse, M., Mbaye, F., Ball, P.D., & Levers, A. (2012). The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. Production Planning & Control, 23(5), 354-376.
• Du, H., Wei, L., Brown, M.A., Wang, Y., & Shi, Z. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of recent energy efficiency literatures: An expanding and shifting focus. Energy Efficiency, 6, 177–190.
• Dyllick, Y., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone: Oxford.
• Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350-366.
• Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., & Wang, B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 79–100.
• Galvis, H.M.T., Bitter, J.H., Khare, C.B., Ruitenbeek, M., Dugulan, A.I., & De Jong, K.P. (2012). Supported iron nanoparticles as catalysts for sustainable production of lower olefins. Science, 335(6070), 835-838.
• Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Production Planning and Control, 23, 83-104.
• Gbededo, M.A., Liyanage, K., & Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2018). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: A systematic review of approaches to sustainable manufacturing. J. of Cl. Prod., 184, 1002-15.
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The circular economy a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
• Ghadiri, M., Marjani, A., & Shirazian, S. (2017). Development of a mechanistic model for prediction of CO2 capture from gas mixtures by amine solutions in porous membranes. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 24, 14508-14515.
• Gholami, H., Abu, F., Lee, J.K.Y. Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Sharif, S. (2021). Sustainable manufacturing 4.0—Pathways and practices. Sustainability, 13(24), 1-21.
• Glavic, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875-1885.
• Gundu, K., Jamwal, A., Yadav, A., Agrawal, R., Jain, J.K., & Kumar, S. (2020). Circular economy and sustainable manufacturing: A Bibliometric Based Review. In R. Agrawal, J. K. Jain, V. S. Yadav, V. K. Manupati ve L. Varela (Eds), Recent advances in industrial production (p 137-147). Springer: Singapore.
• Haapala, K.R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J.W., Skerlos, S.J., Dornfeld, D. A.,…Rickli, J. (2013). A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. Journal.of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135(4).
• Hartini, S., Ciptomulyono, U., Pujawan, N., Ciptomulyono, U., Baihaqi, I., & Santosa, B. (2015). The relationship between lean and sustainable manufacturing on performance: literature review. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 38-45.
• Hussain, S., & Jahanzaib, M. (2018). Sustainable manufacturing – An overview and a conceptual framework for continuous transformation and competitiveness. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 13(3), 237–253.
• Jabbour, A.B.D.L., Jabbour, CJ.C., Foropon, C., & Godinho, M. (2018). When titans meet - Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18-25.
• Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Kumar, V., & Garza-Reyes, J.A.A. (2022). Machine learning applications for sustainable manufacturing: A bibliometric-based review for future research. Journal of Enerprise Information Management, 35, 566-596.
• Jamwal, A., Agrawel, R., Sharma, M., Manuupati, V.K., & Patidar, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 and sustainable manufacturing: A bibliometric based review. In R. Agrawal, J. K. Jain, V. S. Yadav, V. K. Manupati ve L. Varela (Eds), Recent advances in smart manufacturing and materials (p. 1-11). Springer: Singapore.
• Jasti, N.V.K., Jha, N.K., Chaganti, P.K., & Kota, S. (2022). Sustainable production system: literature review and trends. Management of Environmental, Quality: An International Journal, 33(3), 692-717.
• Jawahir, I.S., & Bradley, R. (2016). Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6r-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 40, 103-108.
• Jayal, A. D., Badurdeen, F., Dillon, O.W., & Jawahir, I. S. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2, 144-152.
• Jimenez-Gonzalez, C., Poechlauer, P., Broxterman, Q., Yang, B-S., Ende, D. A. et al. (2011). Key green engineering research areas for sustainable manufacturing: A perspective from pharmaceutical and fine chemicals manufacturers. Organic Process Research & Development, 15, 900-911.
• Joung, C.B., Crrell, J., Sarkar, P., & Feng, S.C. (2013). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148-157.
• Jovane, F., Westkämper, E., & Williams, D. (2018). Towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. In F. Jovane, E. Westkämper, & D. Williams (Eds.) The ManuFuture Road (p. 31-52). Berlin: Springer.
• Kagermann, H., Lukas, W., Wahlster, W. (2015, April 17). Abschotten ist keine Alternative. VDI Nachrichten, 16.
• Kazakova, E., & Lee, J. (2022) Sustainable manufacturing for a circular economy. Sustainability, 14(24), 1-20.
• Khaitan, S.K., & Mccalley, J. (2014). Design techniques and applications of cyber physical systems: A survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 9(2), 350-365.
• Khor, K.S., & Hazen, B.T. (2016). Remanufactured products purchase intentions and behaviour: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Production Research 55(8), 2149–2162.
• Kleindorfer, P.R., & Saad, G.H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239-242.
• Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18- 23.
• Li, L., & Sun, Z.Y. (2013). Dynamic energy control for energy efficiency improvement of sustainable manufacturing systems using Markov Decision Process. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems, 43(5), 1195-1205.
• Li, X.D., Jia, P., & Wang, T. (2016) Furfural: A promising platform compound for sustainable production of C-4 and C-5 Chemicals. ACS Catalysis, 6, 7621-7640.
• Liu, L., Song, W., & Liu, Y. (2023). Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: Reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 178, 1-16.
• Machado, C.G., Winroth, M.P., & Ribeiro, E.H.D. (2019). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1462-1484.
• Malek, J., & Tushar, N. D. (2020). A systematic literature review to map literature focus of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 1-20.
• Marjanovic, U., Lalic, B., Medic, N., Prester, J., & Palcic, I. (2020). Servitization in manufacturing: Role of antecedents and firm characteristics. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 133–144.
• Martinez, J.M.G., Puertas, R., Martin, J.M.M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2022). Digitalization, innovation and environmental policies aimed at achieving sustainable production. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 92-100.
• Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., & Haq, A.N. (2013). Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Research, 52(1), 188-202.
• Moktadir, M. A., Rahman, T., Rahman, M. H., Ali, S.M., & Paul, S.K. (2018). Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: A perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1366–80.
• Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2019). A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 53-68.
• Mumu, J.R., Saona, P., Russell, H.I., & Azad, M.A.K. (2021). Corporate governance and remuneration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(4), 242–262.
• Nanda, M.R., Zhang, Y.S., Yuan, Z.S., Qin, W., Ghaziaskar, H.S., & Xu, C.B. (2016). Catalytic conversion of glycerol for sustainable production of solketal as a fuel additive: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1022-1031.
• Nimsai, S., Yoopetch, C., & Lai, P. (2020). Mapping the Knowledge Base of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(8), 1-21.
• Ozguner, M., & Ozguner, Z. (2022). Evaluation of the importance of additive manufacturing technology in terms of sustainable production with the DEMATEL Method. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(10), 116-125.
• Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka’s Law: A Testing Procedure. Inf. Process. Manag., 21, 305–320.
• Patidar, A., Sharma, M., Agrawal, R., Sangwan, K. S., & Jamwal, A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives. In Recent Advances in Industrial Production: Select Proceedings of ICEM 2020 (pp. 167-187). Springer Singapore.
• Pusavec, F., Krajinik, P., & Kopac, J. (2010). Transitioning to sustainable production - Part I: application on machining Technologies. Journal of Clenaer Production, 18(2), 174-184.
• Rakic, S., Pavlovic, M., Marjanovic, U.A. (2021). A precondition of sustainability: Industry 4.0 readiness. Sustainability, 13(12), 1-12.
• Roy, V., & Singh, S. (2017). Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: Review and research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 224-236.
• Rusinko, C.A. (2007). Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 445-454.
• Sangwan, K.S. (2011). Development of a multi criteria decision model for justification of green manufacturing systems. International Journal of Green Economics, 5(3), 285-305.
• Sanyé-Mengual, E., Pérez-López, P., González-García, S., Lozano, R.G., Feijoo, G., Moreira, M.T., Gabarrell, X., & Rieradevall, J. (2014). Eco-designing the use phase of products in sustainable manufacturing: the importance of maintenance and communication-to-user strategies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(4), 545–557.
• Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.
• Sartal, A., Roberto, B., Mejias, A.M., & Garcia-Collado, A. (2020). The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(5).
• Shah, S., Menon, S., Olumide, O.O., & Ganji, E.N. (2020). Digitalisation in sustainable manufacturing-A literature review. In IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (p. 1-6). Marrakech.
• Smith, L., & Ball, P. (2012). Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 227-238.
• Srirangan, K., Akawi, L., Moo-Young, M., & Chou, C.P. (2012). Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources. Applied Energy, 100, 172-186.
• Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536-541.
• Sun, B., Yang, C., Wang, Y., Gui, W., Craig, L., & Olivier, L. (2020). A comprehensive hybrid first principles/machine learning modeling framework for complex industrial processes. Journal of Process Control, 86, 30-43.
• Teigiserova D.A., Hamelin, L., & Thomsen, M. (2019). Review of high-value food waste and food residues biorefineries with focus on unavoidable wastes from processing. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 149, 413–426.
• Tseng, M-L., Chiu, S.F., Tan, R.R., & Siriban-Manalang, A.B. (2013). Sustainable consumption and production for Asia: Sustainability through green design and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 1-5.
• UN. (2021). Sustainable development goals: The 17 goals. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations
• UNEP. (2015). Sustainable consumption and production global edition a handbook for policymakers. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9660 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1951Sustainable%20Consumption.pdf. (The Access Date: 04.08.2022).
• Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070.
• Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., & Crumbley, C. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5), 447-452.
• Wang, Q.F. (2010). Green manufacturing-oriented digital system and operation technologies for manufacturing enterprises. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 20(23), 40-44.
• Wangsa, I. D., Vanany, I., & Siswanto, N. (2022). Issues in sustainable supply chain’s futuristic technologies: a bibliometric and research trend analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 22885-22912.
• Xia, L.T., & Lin, X.M. (2022). Critical factors in the sustainable development of product design for eco-innovation and green manufacturing, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 23(4), 1536-1452.
• Xu, L., & Wang, C. (2018). Sustainable manufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain considering emission reduction and remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 131, 297–304.
• Yip, W.S., Zhou, H.T., & To, S. (2022). Discover the trend and evolution of sustainable manufacturing: a thematic and bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 38899–38911.
• Yu, D., Xu, Z., Wang, W. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy optimization and decision making (2002–2017). Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 18, 371–397.
• Yu, Z., Waqas, M., Tabish, M., Tanveer, M., Haq, I. U., & Khan, S. A. R. (2022). Sustainable supply chain management and green technologies: a bibliometric review of literature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(39), 58454-58470.
• Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
• Zhang, X., Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management under big data: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 427-445.
• Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Zhou, G. (2018). Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: the role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115, 230–238.
• Zhou, H., Yip, W.S., Ren, J., & To, S. (2022). Thematic analysis of sustainable ultra-precision machining by using text mining and unsupervised learning method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 62, 218-233.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429–472.