CHINA’S CHALLENGE TO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA IN CONTEXT OF SOUTH CHINA SEA PROBLEM

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 3, 139 - 160, 28.09.2025

Vildan Meydan

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1633024

Abstract

This study examines the South China Sea problem within the framework of China's approach to the International Law of the Sea. One of the important questions of the study is whether China, which is the most powerful among all riparian states in the region and the most assertive in terms of its policies, will comply with the existing international law in order to protect its claims and increase its control in the region. In this context, it has been questioned whether China will adapt to the existing norms of the international law of the sea or whether it will instrumentalize the existing legal structure in line with its own interests. Study finds that China adopts a more pragmatic approach to the international law of the sea rather than a purely revisionist stance.

Keywords

China , International Law of the Sea , South China Sea problem

References

• Anh, C.N. (2013). The South China Sea for China, the United States and, what choice for Vietnam, Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2204570
• Awan, S. H. (2023). South China Sea: A Chinese approach. Margalla Papers. 2, 44-59.
• Beckman, R. (2013). International law, UNCLOS, and the South China Sea. Beckman, R. , Townsend-Gault, I., Schofield, C. , Davenport, D. and Bernard L. (Ed)., Beyond territorial disputes in the South China Sea. (pp. 47-90). Monograph Book.
• Bernas, S.J.G.F.J. (2011). The Spratlys. Inquirer.net. https://opinion.inquirer.net/8585/the-spratlys
• Boon, H.T. (2018). China’s global identity: Considering the responsibilities of a great power. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Bosco, D. (July 25, 2024) China is reshaping the maritime legal order. Lawfare Media. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/china-is-reshaping-the-maritime-legal-order
• Brunnstrom D. and Martina M. (2015). Xi denies China turning artificial islands into military bases. Reuters. https://www.europeanguanxi.com/post/pragmatic-offensive-realism-in-the-south-china-sea
• Buszynski, L. (2003). ASEAN, the declaration on conduct, and the South China Sea Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 343-362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25798652?seq=
• Buzan, B. (2010). China in international society: Is ‘peaceful rise’ possible?. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3, 5-36.
• Carlson, A. (2008) Unifying China, integrating with the world: Securing Chinese sovereignty in the reform era. Singapore: NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070648
• Caruana, A. (2023). Nine-Dash line. Institute for China-American Studies (ICAS), https://chinaus-icas.org/research/map-spotlight-nine-dash-line/
• Chan, E. and Sing Y. (2024). China’s discourse of maritime power: A thematic analysis. Journal of Contemporary China: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2319064
• Chang, T.K. (1991). China’s claim of sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A historical and legal perspective, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 23(3): 399-420.
• Chihiro, S. (2022). South China Sea issue: Enhancing the rule of law under the US-China competiton. The Griffith Asia Institute. 1-16.
• China says military development of islands within its rights. (2022). APNews, https://apnews.com/article/china-beijing-international-law-south-china-sea-4370828e295d2eec9a4804bba9940273
• Chubb, A. (2022). Xi Jinping and China’s maritime policy. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/xi-jinping-and-chinas-maritime-policy/
• Clayman, T. (2023). China’s new map: The 10-Dash line map, Boston Political Review, https://www.bostonpoliticalreview.org/post/china-s-new-map-the-10-dash-line
• Çubukçuoğlu, S. (2016). Güney Çin Denizi’ndeki paylaşım mücadelesi. KUDENFOR Deniz Savunma ve Güvenlik Araştırmaları Çalışma Grubu.
• Duong, W. N. (2006) Following the path of oil: The law of the sea or realpolitik - what good does law do in the South China Sea territorial conflicts?. Fordham International Law Journal, 30(4): 1098-1208
• Dutton, P.A. (2023). China is ewriting the law of the sea. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/10/china-sea-south-east-maritime-claims-law-oceans-us-disputes/
• Full text: China adheres to the position of settling through negotiation the relevant disputes between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea. (2016). Xinhua.net http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2016-07/13/c_135509153.htm
• Full text: China’s military strategy. (2015). The State Council The People’s Republicf of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2015/05/27/content_281475115610833.htm
• Guan, A. C. (2000). The South China Sea dispute revisited. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 54(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/713613514
• Hai, D. T. (2017) Vietnam and the South China Sea: Politics, security and legality. London and New York: Routledge
• Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea: The struggle for power in Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Hong, N. (2012). UNCLOS and ocean dispute settlement: Law and politics in the South China Sea. London and New York: Routledge.
• Hong, Z. (2013). The South China Sea dispute and China-ASEAN relations. Asian Affairs, 44(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2012.760785
• Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Johnston, A. I. (2003). Is China a status quo power?. International Security. 27(4), 5-56.
• Kardon, I. B. (2023). China’s law of the sea: The new rules of the maritime order. Yale University Press.
• Kasım, K. (2024). Güney Çin Denizi sorunlarının bölgesel ve uluslararası güvenliğe etkileri. International Journal of Politics and Security, 6(1), 22-37.
• Kennedy, S. China in global governance: What kind of status quo power?. Kennedy S. And Cheng S. (Ed). The Growing Role of Chinese in Global Governance. Shangai: Shangai Longyu Printing Technology.
• Keyuan, Z. (1999). Scarborough reef: A new flashpoint in Sino-Philippine relations?. IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin, 71-81.
• Kuok, L. (2019). How China’s actions in the South China Sea undermine the rule of law. Brookings Institution, 1-15.
• Lanteigne, M. (2016). The South China Sea in China’s developing maritime strategy. F. Enrico and V. Truong-Minh (Ed.), Power politics in Asia’s contested waters: territorial disputes in the South China Sea. (pp: 97-116). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Lorenz, L. (2018). The Souht China Sea as a challenge to the international law and international legal scholarship. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 36(3), 383-417.
• Ma, X. (2019). China and the UNCLOS: Practices and policies. The Chinese Journal of Global Governance, 5, 1-20.
• Mc Dorman, T. L., (1993). The South China Sea islands dispute in the 1990s – A new multilateral process and continuing friction. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 8(2), 263-285.
• Mingjiang, L. (2009). China’s South China Sea dilemma: Balancing sovereignty, development and security. B. Sam and E. Ralf (Ed.), Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime. (pp:140-155)London and New York: Routledge.
• Mitter, R. (2022). China: Revolutionary or revisionist. The Washington Quarterly, 45(3), 7-22.
• National Committee on U.S.-China Relations. (2023). China’s law of the sea: The new rules of maritime order. https://www.ncuscr.org/podcast/chinas-law-of-the-seas
• Nguyen, H. and Nha, N. (2019). Vietnam, territoriality and the South China Sea: Paracel and Spratly islands. New York: Routledge.
• Ohnesorge, H. W. (2016). A sea of troubles: International law and the spitsbergen plus approach to conflict management in the South China Sea. F. Enrico and V. Truong-Minh (Ed.), Power politics in Asia’s contested waters: Territorial disputes in the South China Sea (pp: 25-57) Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Parameswaran P. (2014). Playing it safe: Malaysia’s approach to the South China Sea and implications for the United States. Maritime Strategy Series.
• Pekcan, C. (2017). Uluslararası hukuk çerçevesinde Güney Çin Denizi krizinin değerlendirilmesi. ANKASAM / Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 54-80.
• Philipinnes alarmed after China sends ‘Monster Ship’ to disputed shoal. (2025). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/chinas-deployment-monster-ship-alarming-says-philippine-security-official-2025-01-14
• Poling, G. P. (2013). The South China Sea in focus: Clarifying the limits of maritime dispute, Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield.
• Roach, J. A. (2014). Malaysia and Brunei: An analysis of their claims in the South China Sea. CNA Occassional Paper.
• Salleh, A. Hamdan, C., Hamdan M. R. and Jusoff, K. (2009) Malaysia’s policy towards its 1963-2008 territorial disputes. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 1(5), 107-116.
• Schofield, C. (2013). Increasingly contested waters?: Conflicting maritime claims in the South China Sea., National Security College Occasional Paper, 5, 9-12.
• Seil, C. (2024). Pragmatic offensive realism in the South China Sea, European Guanxi, https://www.europeanguanxi.com/post/pragmatic-offensive-realism-in-the-south-china-sea
• Shicun, W. (2013). Solving disputes for regional cooperation and development in the South China Sea: A Chinese perspective Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
• Smith, R. W. (2010) Maritime delimitation in the South China Sea: Potentiality and challenges. Ocean Development & International Law, 41(3), 214-236.
• South China Sea: Satellite photos ‘show weapons’ built on islands. (2016). BBC. https://www.europeanguanxi.com/post/pragmatic-offensive-realism-in-the-south-china-sea
• Storey, I. (2020). Malaysia and the South China Sea dispute: Policy continuity amid domestic political change. ISEAS Perspective, 18 : 1-10.
• Strangio, S. (2024). Philipinnes, China again clash at two disputed South China Sea shoals. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2024/12/philippines-china-again-clash-at-two-disputed-south-china-sea shoals/#:~:text=The%20confrontations%20at%20Scarborough%20and,pressure%20campaign%20in%20disputed%20waters.&text=The%20Philippines%20has%20again%20accused,in%20the%20South%20China%20Sea
• Tanaka, Y. (2012). The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tommy T. B. K. (1982). A constitution for the oceans. (Statement by President Koh at the final session of the Conference at Montego Bay). The Law of the Sea: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
• Tønnesson S. (2020). Four aspects of the crisis in the South China Sea. Buszynski L. and Hai D. T. (Ed.), The South China Sea: From a regional maritime dispute to geo-strategic competition. (pp. 9-24). London and New York: Routledge.
• Tullio, T (2015). Historical development of the Law of the Sea. Scott, K. N. and Stephens T. (Ed)., The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. (pp: 1-24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• United States Department of State (2014) Limits in the sea. Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, 143.
• Valencia, M. J. (2017) US-China clash of civilizations is being played out in the South China Sea. South China Morning Post, https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2109792/us-china-clash-civilisations-being-played-out-south-china
• Valencia, M. J., Van Dyke, J. M and Ludwig, N. A. (1997). Sharing the resources of the South China Sea. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Wei, Y. (2019), Issues decisive for China’s rise or fall: An international law perspective. Singapore: Springer.
• Whitmore C. (1896). The doctrine of the acquisiton of territory by occupation in international law. Historical Thesis and Dissertation Collection. Paper 365.
• Yiallourides C. (2020). International law, force and coercion in South China Sea. Buszynski L. and Hai D. T. (Ed.), The South China Sea: From a regional maritime dispute to geo-strategic competition. (pp. 169-182). London and New York: Routledge.
• Yoon, S. (2015). Implications of Xi Jinping’s “True maritime power”: Its context, significance and impact on the region. Nawal War College Review, 68(3), 41-63.