WATER ACCOUNTING IN SOCIAL SCIENCES: TRENDS, DEVELOPMENTS, AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 3, 270 - 298, 28.09.2025

Merve Öz

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1643876

Abstract

Water accounting is crucial for providing integrated information that supports water governance and management. It provides a foundation for informed decision-making for various stakeholders who rely on water information for different purposes. Water accounting is not new; it has evolved significantly over the past three decades. This study systematically reviews publications in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) journals within the Web of Science database through bibliometric analysis, examining the research trends and developments in water accounting. One hundred-five publications were analyzed, revealing fluctuating yet increasing research activity. The earliest recorded study dates to 2005, with a marked increase in publications after 2012. The Journal of Cleaner Production and The Journal of Sustainability are the leading sources, each contributing nine studies. Australia has emerged as a dominant contributor to water accounting research in social sciences, followed by China. Key trending topics in the field include water footprint, virtual water, consumption, trade, sustainability, and scarcity. Future research should focus on corporate water accounting, virtual water, and consumption patterns of entities and individuals and strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration in water studies. This study aims to enhance academics' awareness and understanding of water accounting in water management, governance, water economics, and environmental accounting.

Keywords

Water Accounting , Water Management , Environmental Accounting , Sustainability , Bibliometric

References

• Abraão, R. P., Sampaio , N. A. S., von Mühlen, C., Reis, J. S. da M., Colombari, C. V., & Dantas, C. L. R. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Water Quality: A Perspective for Environmental Preservation. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(2), e05018. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-096
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
• Batchelor, C., Hoogeveen, J., Faurès, J. M., Peiser, L., & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). Water accounting & auditing guidelines: A sourcebook (Vol. 43). Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
• Burritt, R. L., & Christ, K. L. (2017). The need for monetary information within corporate water accounting. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 72-81.
• Chalmers, K., Godfrey, J. M., & Lynch, B. (2012a). Regulatory theory insights into the past, present and future of general-purpose water accounting standard setting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(6), 1001-1024.
• Chalmers, K., Godfrey, J., & Potter, B. (2012b). Discipline-informed approaches to water accounting. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 275 - 285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00175.x
• Cheng, Z., Yan, S., Song, T., Cheng, L., & Wang, H. (2022). Adaptive water governance research in social sciences journals: a bibliometric analysis. Water Policy, 24(12), 1951-1970.
• Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2017a). Water management accounting: A framework for corporate practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 379-386.
• Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2017b). What constitutes contemporary corporate water accounting? A review from a management perspective. Sustainable Development, 25(2), 138-149.
• Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2018). The role for transdisciplinarity in water accounting by business: reflections and opportunities. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 25(3), 302-320.
• Cosgrove, W. J., & Loucks, D. P. (2015). Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resources Research, 51(6), 4823-4839.
• Escriva-Bou, A., McCann, H., Hanak, E., Lund, J., Gray, B., Blanco, E., Jezdimirovic, J., Magnuson-Skeels, B., & Tweet, A. (2020). Water accounting in Western US, Australia, and Spain: Comparative analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001157
• Falkenmark, M., & Wang-Erlandsson, L. (2021). A water-function-based framework for understanding and governing water resilience in the Anthropocene. One Earth, 4(2), 213-225.
• Feng, Q., Sun, Y., Li, X., He, M., Luo, Y., Liu, C., & Wang, L. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of water footprint in China and abroad: research hotspots and frontiers. Water Science & Technology, 90(6), 1759-1783.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). Water accounting for water governance and sustainable development. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d816296a-d0ce-4221-8dcd-56c707d4f61b/content Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). The State of Food and Agriculture 2020. Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Rome.
• Godfrey, J. M., & Chalmers, K. (Eds.) (2012). Water Accounting: International Approaches to Policy and Decision-Making. (1st ed.) Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849807500
• Hazelton, J. (2013). Accounting as a human right: the case of water information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(2), 267-311.
• Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). Water footprint accounting. Water Accounting-International Approaches to Policy and Decision-making, 58-76.
• Hutton G, Chase C. Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene. In: Mock CN, Nugent R, Kobusingye O, et al., editors. Injury Prevention and Environmental Health. 3rd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017 Oct 27. Chapter 9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525207/doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0522-6_ch9
• Jiang, Y., Coates, D., & Connor, R. (2021). Knowledge, research and capacity development as enabling conditions. Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W. G., & Molden, D. (2013). Water Accounting Plus (WA+)–a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(7), 2459-2472.
• Lange, G. M., Mungatana, E., & Hassan, R. (2007). Water accounting for the Orange River Basin: An economic perspective on managing a transboundary resource. Ecological economics, 61(4), 660-670.
• Lawani, S. M.. "Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications" Libri, vol. 31, no. Jahresband, 1981, pp. 294-315. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294
• Low, M. P., & Siegel, D. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of employee-centred corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 691-717.
• Maione, G., Cuccurullo, C., & Tommasetti, A. (2023). An algorithmic historiography of biodiversity accounting literature. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(6), 1665-1694.
• OECD. (2015). OECD principles on water governance. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/governance/oecd-principles-on-water-governance.htm
• Olusanmi, O. A., Emeni, F. K., Uwuigbe, U., & Oyedayo, O. S. (2021). A bibliometric study on water management accounting research from 2000 to 2018 in Scopus database. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1886645.
• Pedro-Monzonís, M., Jiménez-Fernández, P., Solera, A., & Jiménez-Gavilán, P. (2016). The use of AQUATOOL DSS applied to the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water (SEEAW). Journal of Hydrology, 533, 1-14.
• Pendse, M.K., Nerlekar, V.S. and Darda, P. (2023), "A comprehensive look at Greenwashing from 1996 to 2021: a bibliometric analysis", Journal of Indian Business Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 157-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-04-2022-0115
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. Raman, S. A., & Rajan, C. S. (2024). A bibliometric study on sustainable water management research evidence from the Scopus database. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(11), 2024249-2024249.
• Tello, E., Hazelton, J., & Cummings, L. (2016). Potential users’ perceptions of general purpose water accounting reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 80-110.
• Tennekes, M. (2018). tmap: Thematic Maps in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 84, 1-39.
• Turner, G.M., Baynes, T.M. & McInnis, B.C. A Water Accounting System for Strategic Water Management. Water Resour Manage 24, 513–545 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9457-7
• United Nations (2021): The United Nations world water development report 2021: Valuing water. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375724
• Vardon, M. J., Le, T. H. L., Martinez-Lagunes, R., Pule, O. B., Schenau, S., May, S., & Grafton, R. Q. (2023). Water Accounts and Water Accounting. (Technical Report). OECD. https://watercommission.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Vardon.pdf
• Vardon, M. J., Le, T. H. L., Martinez-Lagunes, R., Pule, O. B., Schenau, S., May, S., & Grafton, R. Q. (2025). Accounting for water: A global review and indicators of best practice for improved water governance. Ecological Economics, 227, 108396.
• Vardon, M., Lenzen, M., Peevor, S., & Creaser, M. (2007). Water accounting in Australia. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 650-659.
• Vogel, R. M., Lall, U., Cai, X., Rajagopalan, B., Weiskel, P. K., Hooper, R. P., & Matalas, N. C. (2015). Hydrology: The interdisciplinary science of water. Water Resources Research, 51(6), 4409-4430.
• Water Calculator. (2019). What is virtual water? Retrieved February 19, 2025, from https://watercalculator.org/footprint/what-is-virtual-water/
• WIREs Water 2017, 4:e01245. doi: 10.1002/wat2.124
• Woodhouse, P., & Muller, M. Water Governance—An Historical Perspective on Current Debates, World Development (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.014
• World Health Organization. (2024, March 22). Sanitation. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation
• Yang, X., Sun, B., Lei, S., Li, F., & Qu, Y. (2022). A bibliometric analysis and review of water resources carrying capacity using rené descartes’s discourse theory. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 970582.
• Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 67(4), 967-972.
• Zhang,Fan; Borja-Vega,Christian. Water for Shared Prosperity - Executive Summary (English). Washington,D.C.:WorldBankGroup. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099051624092023618/P5013811ceb7aa0a1186301e150ebe7f8a5