PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND THE DENIAL OF SREBRENICA GENOCIDE: INSIGHTS FROM COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 3, 380 - 401, 28.09.2025

İbrahim Fevzi Güven

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1660147

Abstract

In post-conflict societies, addressing the denial and even the justification of past atrocities is a critical step toward achieving sustainable peace, transitional justice, and reconciliation. How can the group psychology behind the denial of wartime atrocities be understood? This study draws on insights from cognitive dissonance theory to shed light on the underlying psychological mechanisms at play in the need for denial or justification of wartime aggression, with a particular focus on the denial of the Srebrenica Genocide. Cognitive dissonance theory posits that individuals experience psychological discomfort when confronted with conflicting beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors. To alleviate this discomfort, individuals can change their attitudes or behaviors, or rationalize their actions. In the context of war crimes, cognitive dissonance theory helps explain why denials, or justifications of these atrocities emerge as individuals seek to resolve the dissonance between their group’s positive image and the recognition of wartime acts. Furthermore, the study proposes Interactive Conflict Resolution (ICR) as a potential approach to address the denial of mass atrocities. ICR offers a framework for dialogue and mutual understanding among parties regarding the sensitive past, which could contribute to reconciliation efforts.

Keywords

Bosnia Herzegovina , Cognitive Dissonance , Conflict Resolution , Srebrenica Genocide , Interactive Conflict Resolution

References

• Aitken, R. (2007). Cementing divisions? An assessment of the impact of international interventions and peace-building policies on ethnic identities and divisions. Policy Studies, 28(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870701437568
• Allen, S. H. (2018). Modes of peacemaking dialogue. In P. N. Stearns (Ed.), Peacebuilding through dialogue: Education, human transformation, and conflict resolution (pp. 203–216). George Mason University Press.
• Andersen, T. S., & Borčak, F. W. (2022). Memory conflicts and memory grey zones: War memory in Bosnia–Herzegovina between public memory disputes, literary narratives and personal experience. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1517–1531. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221134679
• Baranovicé, B. (2001). History textbooks in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina. Intercultural Education, 12(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980120033939
• Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Collective memory of physical violence: Its contribution to the culture of violence. In E. Cairns & M. D. Roe (Eds.), The role of memory in ethnic conflict (pp. 77–93). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919823_5
• Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
• Barton Hronešová, J. (2022). Ethnopopulist denial and crime relativisation in Bosnian Republika Srpska. East European Politics, 38(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2021.1871896
• Bartulovic, A. (2008). Nationalism in the classroom: Narratives of the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina (1992-1995) in the history textbooks of the Republic of Srpska. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 6(3), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2006.tb00098.x
• Bass, G. J. (2000). Stay the hand of vengeance: The politics of war crimes tribunals. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq0sn
• Bassiouni, M. C. (Ed.). (2002). Post-Conflict justice. Transnational Publishers.
• Bennett, C. (2016). Bosnia’s paralysed peace. Hurst.
• Božić, G. (2019). Diversity in ethnicization: War memory landscape in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Memory Studies, 12(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017714834
• Broz, S. (2004). Good people in an evil time: Portraits of complicity and Bosnian War (L. K. Hart, Ed.; E. Elias-Bursac, Trans.). Other Press.
• ‘Butcher of Bosnia’: Why war criminal Ratko Mladic has hero status among some in the Balkans. (2021, June 7). The Week. https://theweek.com/news/world-news/europe/953073/why-ratko-mladic-butcher-of-bosnia-still-hero-balkans
• Celermajer, D. (2009). The sins of the nation and the ritual of apologies. Cambridge University Press.
• Charny, I. W. (2007). A classification of denials of the Holocaust and other genocides. In M. Lattimer (Ed.), Genocide and Human Rights (pp. 517–540). Routledge.
• Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
• Cuhadar, E., & Dayton, B. (2011). The social psychology of identity and inter-group conflict: From theory to practice. International Studies Perspectives, 12(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00433.x
• Drumbl, M. A. (2007). Atrocity, punishment, and international law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611100
• Drygiel-Bielińska, M. (2023). A fragile peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In R. Zięba (Ed.), Politics and security of central and Eastern Europe (pp. 197–214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16419-4_10
• Dzeko, D., Morina, D., Pantovic, M., Musai, S., Marusic, S. J., & Milekic, S. (2016, December 7). Balkan war crime suspects maintain political influence. Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2016/12/07/balkan-war-crime-suspects-maintain-political-influence-12-02-2016/
• Egan, L. C., Santos, L. R., & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance: Evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18(11), 978–983.
• Emric, E. (2021). Ahead of war crimes verdict, Ratko Mladic’s bloody legacy still divides Bosnia. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2021/06/05/ahead-of-war-crimes-verdict-ratko-mladic-s-bloody-legacy-still-divides-bosnia
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Fetahagić, S. S. (2020). The most golden age: A discourse analysis of representations of medieval Bosnia in secondary-school history textbooks in the Federation of BiH. In G. Ognjenović & J. Jozelić (Eds.), Nationhood and politicization of history in school textbooks (pp. 181–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38121-9_10
• Fisher, R. J. (1997). Interactive conflict resolution. Syracuse University Press.
• Fisher, R. J. (2018). Social-Psychological processes in interactive conflict analysis and reconciliation. In H.-W. Jeong (Ed.), Conflict resolution: Dynamics, process and structure (pp. 81–104). Routledge.
• Fisher, R. J., Tadevosyan, M., & Cuhadar, E. (2023). Track 2 dialogues (The USIP learning agenda: An evidence review). United States Institute of Peace.
• Fridman, O., & Ristić, K. (2020). Online transnational memory activism and commemoration: The case of the White Armband Day. In J. Wüstenberg & A. Sierp (Eds.), Agency in transnational memory politics (pp. 68–91). Berghahn Books.
• Gellman, M. (2019). The politics of memory: What future for transitional justice?. Latin American Research Review, 54(2), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.460
• Gilbert, A., & Mujanović, J. (2015). Dayton at twenty: Towards new politics in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15(4), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1130359
• Gödl, D. (2007). Challenging the past: Serbian and Croatian aggressor-victim narratives. International Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659370103
• Gosling, P., Denizeau, M., & Oberlé, D. (2006). Denial of responsibility: A new mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.722
• Güven, İ. F. (2024). Revisiting ethnic framing in conflicts: Challenging the concept of ethnic conflict. Journal of Humanity, Peace and Justice, 1(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.26650/hupej.2024.10.1.1459672
• Halilovich, H. (2018). Globalization and genocide. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 2493–2502). Springer.
• Hayner, P. B. (2010). Unspeakable truths: Transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions. Routledge.
• Hromadžic, A. (2015). Citizens of an empty nation: Youth and state-making in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Huyse, L. (2003). The process of reconciliation. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes, & L. Huyse (Eds.), Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook (pp. 19–33). International IDEA.
• Jacobs, J. (2017). The memorial at Srebrenica: Gender and the social meanings of collective memory in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Memory Studies, 10(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016650485
• Jeong, H.-W. (2005). Peacebuilding in postconflict societies: Strategy and process. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Kappler, S., & Richmond, O. P. (2011). Peacebuilding and culture in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Resistance or emancipation? Security Dialogue, 42(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611405377
• Karčić, H. (2021). Triumphalism: The final stage of the Bosnian genocide. In J. Cox, A. Khoury, & S. Minslow (Eds.), Denial: The final stage of genocide (pp. 99–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010708-6
• Katana, G., & Sito-Sucic, D. (2016, March 23). Karadzic is innocent, set him free, Bosnian Serbs say. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/karadzic-is-innocent-set-him-free-bosnian-serbs-say-idUSKCN0WP174/
• Kostić, R. (2012). Transitional justice and reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Whose memories, whose justice? Sociologija, 54(4), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1204649K
• Kostovicova, D. (2004). Republika Srpska and its boundaries in Bosnian Serb geographical narratives in the Post‐Dayton period. Space and Polity, 8(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356257042000309616
• Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.
• Leonardsson, H., & Rudd, G. (2015). The ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029905
• Lovrenović, D. (2016). Bosnia and Herzegovina as the stage of three parallel and conflicted historical memories. European Review, 24(4), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279871600003X
• Mannergren Selimovic, J. (2015). Challenges of postconflict coexistence: Narrating truth and justice in a Bosnian town. Political Psychology, 36(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12205
• Marijan, B. (2017). The politics of everyday peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Ireland. Peacebuilding, 5(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2016.1265046
• Massey, S. (2021). The Bosnian genocide and the “Continuum of Denial.” In J. Cox, A. Khoury, & S. Minslow (Eds.), Denial: The final stage of genocide (pp. 113–130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010708-7
• McGrath, A. (2017). Dealing with dissonance: A review of cognitive dissonance reduction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12362
• Miller, P. B. (2006). Contested memories: The Bosnian genocide in Serb and Muslim minds. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623520600950054
• Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Beacon Press.
• Minow, M. (2002). Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law, and repair. Princeton University Press.
• Mochtak, M., & Muharemović, E. (2024). The abyss of ethnic division: Two decades of discussing war in the parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ethnopolitics, 23(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2120283
• Moll, N. (2013). Fragmented memories in a fragmented country: Memory competition and political identity-building in today’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. Nationalities Papers, 41(6), 910–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.768220
• Montville, J. V. (1993). The healing function in political conflict resolution. In D. J. D. Sandole & H. van der Merwe (Eds.), Conflict resolution theory and practice integration and application (pp. 112–128). Manchester University Press.
• Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017). An analysis of Leon Festinger’s: A theory of cognitive dissonance. Taylor and Francis.
• Neiman, S. (2019). Learning from the Germans: Race and the memory of evil. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Nettelfield, L. J. (2010). From the battlefield to the barracks: The ICTY and the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijp033
• Neuffer, E. (2001). The key to my neighbor’s house: Seeking justice in Bosnia and Rwanda. Picador.
• Oberschall, A. (2013). History and peacebuilding. In R. Mac Ginty (Ed.), Routledge handbook of peacebuilding (pp. 171–182). Routledge.
• Obradovic-Wochnik, J. (2009). Knowledge, acknowledgement and denial in Serbia’s responses to the Srebrenica Massacre. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 17(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782800902844719
• Pehar, D. (2019). Peace as war: Bosnia-Herzegovina Post-Dayton. Central European University Press.
• Petritsch, W., & Dzihic, V. (Eds.). (2010). Conflict and memory: Bridging past and future in (South East) Europe. Nomos.
• Ramet, S. P. (2007a). The denial syndrome and its consequences: Serbian political culture since 2000. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(1), 41–58.
• Ramet, S. P. (2007b). The dissolution of Yugoslavia: Competing narratives of resentment and blame. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 55(1), 26–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2007-550104
• Rigby, A. (2001). Justice and reconciliation: After the violence. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Ross, M. H. (2013). The politics of memory and peacebuilding. In R. Mac Ginty (Ed.), Routledge handbook of peacebuilding (pp. 91–101). Routledge.
• Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. Jossey-Bass.
• Ruvic, D. (2017, November 17). Mladic still a hero in dying home village in Bosnia. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/mladic-still-a-hero-in-dying-home-village-in-bosnia-idUSKBN1DH14H/
• Salecl, R. (2020). A passion for ignorance: What we choose not to know and why. Princeton University Press.
• Salt, J. (2024). Genocide in Gaza—cognitive dissonance and Israel’s “rights.” Palestine Chronicle. https://www.palestinechronicle.com/genocide-in-gaza-cognitive-dissonance-and-israels-rights/
• Scheffer, D. J. (2021). What does Mladic’s conviction mean for genocide law?. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/article/what-does-mladics-conviction-mean-genocide-law
• Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1988). The robbers cave experiment: intergroup conflict and cooperation. Wesleyan University Press.
• Staub, E. (1999). The origins and prevention of genocide, mass killing, and other collective violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 5(4), 303–336.
• Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil why children, adults, and groups help and harm others. Cambridge University Press.
• Stover, E., & Weinstein, H. M. (Eds.). (2004). My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge University Press.
• Suljagic, E. (2020, October 19). How the Bosnian Serb Assembly redefined Bosniaks as enemy ‘Turks.’ Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/10/19/how-the-bosnian-serb-assembly-redefined-bosniaks-as-enemy-turks/
• Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of ıntergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
• Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2015). Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. Mariner Books.
• Torsti, P. (2007). How to deal with a difficult past? History textbooks supporting enemy images in post‐war Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600765278
• Torsti, P. (2013). Rival histories & textbook reform in Bosnian textbooks 1992-2009. In O. Listhaug & S. P. Ramet (Eds.), Bosnia-Herzegovina since Dayton: Civic and uncivic values (pp. 205–223). Longo. https://doi.org/10.1400/212382
• Trbovc, J. M. (2014). Memory after ethnic cleansing: Victims’ and perpetrators’ narratives in Prijedor. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies, 72, 25–41.
• Tregoures, L. (2017, October 31). War crimes denial is a psychological defence mechanism. Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2017/10/31/war-crimes-denial-is-a-psychological-defence-mechanism-10-30-2017/
• Vuksanović, M. (2004). From enemy territory: Pale diary. Saqi in association with the Bosnian Institute.
• Williams, P. R., & Scharf, M. P. (2002). Peace with justice? War crimes and accountability in the Former Yugoslavia. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Yerkes, M. (2004). Facing the violent past: Discussions with Serbia’s youth. Nationalities Papers, 32(4), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090599042000296168