Küresel Düzeyde Sürdürülebilir Liderlik: Bibliyografik Bir Analiz ve Temel Kavramların Evrimi

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 273 - 290, 29.12.2024

Artür Yetvart Mumcu

Abstract

Bu araştırma, sürdürülebilir liderlik kavramını geniş bir perspektiften ele alarak, literatürdeki anahtar temaları ve kavramsal bağlantıları ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, bibliyografik analiz ve VOSviewer yazılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiş kapsamlı bir anahtar kelime incelemesiyle, sürdürülebilir liderlik literatüründeki eğilimleri ve tematik yoğunlukları analiz etmiştir. Araştırma, sürdürülebilir liderliğin ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal boyutlarına odaklanarak, bu liderlik modelinin çok boyutlu yapısını detaylandırmıştır. Veriler, liderlerin ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik stratejileri geliştirme, çevresel etkileri azaltma ve sosyal refahı artırma çabalarını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, dijitalleşmenin ve COVID-19 pandemisinin sürdürülebilir liderlik uygulamaları üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Pandemi sürecinde liderlerin kriz yönetimi yetenekleri, çalışan refahını önceliklendirme ve örgütsel dayanıklılığı artırma kapasiteleri detaylı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, sürdürülebilir liderlik uygulamalarının stratejik yönetim, çalışan bağlılığı ve çevre dostu inovasyon gibi kritik alanlarda nasıl etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, araştırma, sürdürülebilir liderliğin modern liderlik teorilerindeki yerini güçlendirmiş ve bu alandaki gelecekteki çalışmalara yeni perspektifler sunmuştur.

Keywords

Sürdürülebilir Liderlik, Sürdürülebilirlik, Liderlik, Bibliyografi

Sustainable Leadership on a Global Scale: A Bibliographic Analysis and the Evolution of Key Concepts

Abstract

The perspective of sustainable leadership is broadly covered in this investigation, which aims to uncover the main topics and the relations among them in the literature. The research underlines the trends and the thematic specifics in sustainable leadership studies through bibliographic analysis and keyword mapping using VOSviewer software. With the focus on the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainable leadership, the article thoroughly gives the exposition of this multidimensional leading paradigm. The results emphasize the efforts of the leaders who develop strategies for economic sustainability, reduce the environmental impacts, and at the same time, improve social welfare. Besides, the study looks into the effects of digital transformation and the COVID-19 pandemic on the practices of sustainable leadership. The focus during the pandemic is on the leaders' crisis management skills, emphasis on the wellness of employees, and ability to strengthen organizational resilience which are discussed in detail. The results throw light on how sustainable leadership practices can effectively impact various areas like strategic management, employees' involvement, and green innovation. Finally, the study not only stresses the sustainable leadership but also the new paths for future research in the field of modern leadership theories.

Keywords

Sustainable Leadership, Sustainability, Leadership, Bibliography

References

• Ajmal, Mian M., Mehmood Khan, Matloub Hussain, and Petri Helo. 2018. “Conceptualizing and Incorporating Social Sustainability in the Business World.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 25(4):327–39.
• Avery, G. C., and H. Bergsteiner. 2011. Sustainable Leadership Practices. Routledge.
• Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
• Bennett, N., G. J. Lemoine, and C. Martin. 2021. “Digital Sustainability and Leadership Practices in the Digital Era.” Journal of Business Research.
• Bhutto, Sara Malik Shaheed Zulfikar Ali. 2024. “Sustainability in Business Management: Strategies for Long-Term Success.” Journal for Business Research Review 2(1):39–50.
• Brown, M. E., and L. K. Treviño. 2006. “Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions.” Leadership Quarterly.
• Davis, T. 2020. “Long-Term Value Creation Through Sustainable Leadership.” Journal of Business Ethics.
• Davis, T., S. Wang, and C. Tsaoussidis. 2022. “Leadership Resilience and Employee Well-Being during COVID-19: A Sustainable Leadership Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics.
• Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20(1):65–91.
• Van Eck, Nees, and Ludo Waltman. 2010. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 84(2):523–38.
• Egri, C. P., and S. Herman. 2000. “Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and Their Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 43(4):571–604.
• Elo, Satu, and Helvi Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1):107–15.
• Epstein, M. J., and A. R. Buhovac. 2014. Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Flick, Uwe. 2018. “Triangulation in Data Collection.”
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Haque, Amlan. 2021. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of Responsible Leadership in Health Care: Thinking beyond Employee Well-Being and Organisational Sustainability.” Leadership in Health Services 34(1):52–68.
• Hargreaves, A., and D. Fink. 2006. Sustainable Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Kim, S., and H. Scullion. 2013. “The Role of Leadership in Sustainable Human Resource Management.” Human Resource Management Review 23(3):259–69.
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. “Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations.” Human Communication Research 30(3):411–33.
• Leydesdorff, L., and I. Rafols. 2009. “A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(2):348–62.
• Lozano, R. 2018. “Sustainable Business Models: Providing a More Holistic Perspective.” Business Strategy and the Environment 27(4):577–84.
• Stogdill, R. M. 1948. “Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature.” Journal of Psychology 25(1):35–71.
• Suriyankietkaew, Suparak, and Gayle Avery. 2016. “Sustainable Leadership Practices Driving Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Thai SMEs.” Sustainability 8(4):327.
• Tranfield, David, David Denyer, and Palminder Smart. 2003. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14(3):207–22.
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
• Westerman, G., D. Bonnet, and A. McAfee. 2014. Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
• White, Marilyn Domas, Emily E. Marsh, Emily E. Marsh, and Marilyn Domas White. 2006. “Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology.” Library Trends 55(1):22– 45.
• Zhu, Ruifang, Mengyue Liu, Yanbing Su, Xin Meng, Shifan Han, and Zhiguang Duan. 2021. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Publication of Funded Studies in Nursing Research from Web of Science, 2008–2018.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 77(1):176–88.