Göreme Milli Parkındaki (Nevşehir) Epifitik Karayosunlarının Substrat Tercihleri

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 96 - 108, 20.11.2021

Recep Kara , Hatice Taşpınar

https://doi.org/10.26672/anatolianbryology.951081

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Göreme Milli Parkı içerisinde yayılış gösteren epifitik karayosunlarının substrat tercihleri ordinasyon yöntemleri kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada istatistik hesaplamalar için açık kaynak kodlu PAST (PAleontological STatistics) programı kullanılmıştır. Bu program ile biyolojik çeşitlilik ve benzerlik indeksleri hesaplanmış ve Temel Bileşen (PCA) ve Küme (CA) analizleri yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda on farklı ağaç türü üzerinden kırk dokuz karayosunu taksonu belirlenmiştir. Bu taksonlar arasında Lewinskya rupestris (Schleich. ex Schwägr.) F.Lara, Garilleti & Goffinet. ve Syntrichia ruralis Weber & D.Mohr. alandaki en kozmopolit karayosunu türleri olarak değerlendirilirken, Populus alba L. ve Carpinus orientalis Mill. briyolojik çeşitliliği en yüksek ağaç türleri olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Briyofit, Kapadokya, Kortikol, Küme Analizi, PAST Programı, PCA, Türkiye

Supporting Institution

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

Project Number

119Z205

Thanks

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumuna maddi destekleri için teşekkür ederiz.

Substrate Preferences of Epiphytic Mosses in Göreme National Park (Nevşehir)

Abstract

In this study, the substrate preferences of Epiphytic Mosses distributed in the Göreme National Park were investigated using ordination methods. In the study, the open source PAST (PAleontological STatistics) program was used for statistical calculations. With this program, biodiversity and similarity indices were calculated and Principal Component and Cluster analysis were made. As a result of the study, fourty nine moss taxa were determined on ten different tree species. When among these taxa, Lewinskya rupestris (Schleich. ex Schwägr.) F.Lara, Garilleti & Goffinet.and Syntrichia ruralis Weber& D.Mohr. were found to be the most cosmopolitan moss species in the study area, among tree species, Populus alba L. and Carpinus orientalis Mill. were determined as the trees with the highest bryological diversity.

Keywords

Bryophytes, Cappadocia, Coticolous, Culuster Analysis, PAST programe, PCA, Turkey

Project Number

119Z205

References

• Baguınon N.T. Merıoles M.T. Alvarez E. Castillo RR. 2008. Principal component analysis in detecting site quality, habitats and bioinvasiveness. J. Nature Studies. 7:2, 97-105.
• Batan N. Özdemir T. Saralıoğlu E. Akçay N. Mendil D. 2021. Determination of Heavy Metal Levels in Some Moss Samples Collected from Near the Highways in Burdur Province. Anatolian Bryology. 7:1, 33-43.
• Connell J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science. 199: 1302-1310.
• Çatak U. Kırmacı M. 2020. Epiphytic Bryophyte Flora of Liquidambar orientalis Forests. Anatolian Bryology. 6:2, 70-77.
• Dierssen K. 2001. Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. - Bryophytorum Bibl. 56:1.
• During H.J. 1992. Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Ecological Classification of Bryophytes and Lichens. Editörleri, J.W. Bates, and H.M. Farmer, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford.
• Ezer T. Seyli T. Bozdoğan Ş.G. Kara R. 2013. Briyofitlerin Ağaç Tercihlerine Göre Dağılımı. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi. 6: 188-191.
• Hammer Ø. Harper D.A.T. Ryan P.D. 2001 Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4:1, 4-9.
• Herrera-Paniagua P. Martinez M. Hernández-Sandoval L. García-Franco J. 2017. Epiphytic Mosses in the Humid Mountain Forests of the Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico-Species Richness, Rarity and Composition. Cryptogamie, Bryologie. 38:2, 171-190.
• Hill, MO. Preston, C.D. Bosanquet S.D.S. Roy D.B. 2007. Bryoatt, Attributes of British and Irish Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts with Information on Native Status, Size, Life Form, Life History, Geography and Habitat. NERC Copyright, Norwich.
• Hodgetts N.G. Söderström L. Blockeel T.L. Caspari S. Ignatov M.S. Konstantinova N.A. Lockhart N. Papp B. Schröck C. Sim-Sim M. Bell D. Bell N.E. Blom H.H. Bruggeman-Nannenga M.A. Brugués M. Enroth J. Flatberg K.I. Garilleti R. Hedenäs L. Holyoak D.T. Hugonnot V. Kariyawasam I. Köckinger H. Kučera J. Lara F. Porley R.D. 2020. An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. Journal of Bryology. 42:1, 1-116.
• Johnson R.A. Wicnern D.W. 1982. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall. Inc.
• Kürschner H. 1999. Life strategies of epiphytic bryophytes in Mediterranean Pinus woodlands and Platanus orientalis alluvial forests of Turkey. Cryptogamie Bryologie. 20:1, 17-33.
• Kürschner H. Frey W. 2020. Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Southwest Asia (Marchantiophyta, Anthoceratophyta, Bryophyta). Nova Hedwigia. 149: 1-267.
• Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos. 76: 5-13.
• Lewinsky J. 1993. A synopsis of the genus Orthotrichum Hedw. (Musci, Orthotrichaceae). Bryobrothera. 2: 1-59.
• León-vargas Y. Engwald E. Proctor MCF. 2006. Microclimate, light adaptation and desiccation tolerance of epiphytic bryophytes in two Venezuelan cloud forest. Journal of biogeography. 33, 901-979.
• Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.
• Mumby P.J. 2001. Beta and habitat diversity in marine systems: a new approach to measurement, scaling and interpretation. Oecologia 128, 274-280.
• Shmida A. Wilson MV. 1985. Biological Determinants of Species Diversity, Journal of Biogeography, 12:1, 1-20.
• Smith A.J.E. 2004. The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press. London.
• Söderström L. During H.J. 2005. Bryophyte rarity viewed from the perspectives of life history strategy and metapopulation Dynamics. Journal of bryology. 27: 261-268.
• Shannon CE. Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press. Urbana. IL.
• URL1. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. 2021. Website: https://tanitma.ktb.gov.tr/TR 22783/kapadokya.html. [Erişim: 26 Nisan 2021].
• URL 2. Gez Gez İnsanı Blog. 2018. Website: https://www.gezgezinsani.com/kapadokya-cografyasi/. [Erişim: 28 Nisan 2021].
• URL3. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. 2021.Website: https://kvmgm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-44433/goreme-milli-parki-ve-kapadokya-nevsehir.html. [Erişim: 04 Mayıs 2021].
• Williams W.T. Lambert J.M. 1966. Multivariate Methods in Plant Ecology: V. Similarity Analyses and Information-Analysis. The Journal of Ecology. 54:2, 427-445.
• Whittaker R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs. 30: 279-338.
• Whittaker R.H. 1972. Evolutıon and Measurement of Species Diversity. Taxon. 21:2-3, 213-251.
• Vanderpoorten A. Engels P. Sotiaux A. 2004. Trends in diversity and abundance of obligate epiphytic bryophytes in a highly managed landscape. Ecography 27: 567-576.
• Vanderpoorten A. Engels P. Sotiaux A. 2004. Trends in diversity and abundance of obligate epiphytic bryophytes in a highly managed landscape. Ecography. 27: 567-576.
• Zander R.H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: Mosses of Harsh Environments. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, Vol. 32, Buffalo, USA.