Clinical Research
BibTex RIS Cite

Use of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scoring in the management of chest pain patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

Year 2023, , 170 - 174, 29.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1374349

Abstract

Aim: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been developed as a useful operational term to refer to a range of disorders consistent with acute myocardial ischemia and/or infarction, usually due to a sudden decrease in coronary blood flow. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) is an international database designed to monitor the outcomes of patients presenting with Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris. The aim of this study is to determine the use of GRACE scoring in predicting major cardiac events in outpatients with chest pain and to evaluate the effects it may have on the patient's follow-up period and number of examinations in the emergency department when applied to patient management.

Material and Methods: Adult patients (>18 years old) who applied to our emergency department and patients with suspected chest pain of cardiac origin in the hospital or before the hospital were included in the study, and clinical, anamnesis data and coronary artery disease risk factors were recorded prospectively. The information of patients with GRACE score data was obtained with "The GRACE 2.0 ACS Risk Calculator app" running on the iOS operating system. All patients were followed for major cardiac events (acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and death from any cause) within 6 weeks from the first admission.

Results: Of the 167 patients admitted to the emergency department, 117 were men (70.1%) and 50 were women (29.9%). No statistically significant relationship was found between the numerical values of GRACE scores and the development of major cardiac event (MCO) (p = 0.358, t = -.922). On the other hand, when the difference in GRACE scores was evaluated between patients with two negative troponin values and other patients, a significant difference was found (p = 0.02). When the follow-up periods in the emergency department were compared between patients whose troponin values were found to be negative twice and those whose second and third troponin values were positive, a significant difference was found (p<0.001). A significant difference was found in follow-up times between those whose first troponin value was positive and those whose second troponin value was negative (p = 0.015).

Conclusion: GRACE scoring may be of limited benefit in the management of patients with chest pain who present to the emergency department.

References

  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):2713-4.
  • Söderholm M, Deligani MM, Choudhary M, Björk J, Ekelund U. Ability of risk scores to predict a low complication risk in patients admitted for suspected acute coronary syndrome. Emerg Med J. 2012 Aug;29(8):644-9.
  • Halpern EJ, Deutsch JP, Hannaway MM, et al. Cardiac risk factors and risk scores vs cardiac computed tomography angiography: a prospective cohort study for triage of ED patients with acute chest pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;31(10):1479-85.
  • Shaikh MK, Hanif B, Shaikh K, Khan W, Parkash J. Validation of Grace Risk Score in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Jul;64(7):807-11.
  • Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, Gibler WB, Moll FL, Doevendans PA. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Feb;7(1):2-8.
  • Abu-Assi E, García-Acuña JM, Peña-Gil C, González-Juanatey JR. Validation of the GRACE risk score for predicting death within 6 months of follow-up in a contemporary cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):640-8.
  • Aragam KG, Tamhane UU, Kline-Rogers E, et al. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores. PLoS One. 2009 Nov 23;4(11):e7947.
  • Ke J, Chen Y, Wang X, Wu Z, Chen F. Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2021. 18;11(8):e048356.
  • Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454.
  • Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8.
  • Celik E, Erkek A, Karakayalıgrace O, Kaya B, Yılmaz S. Determination of The Validity and Reliability of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Scores in Elderly Patıents With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department. Kocaeli Medical Journal. 9. 111-118. 10.5505/ktd.2020.02360.
  • Yanqiao L, Shen L, Yutong M, Linghong S, Ben H. Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):4.
  • Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021 Sep 29; 374, n2106.

Acil serviste akut koroner sendrom şüphesi olan göğüs ağrılı hastaların yönetiminde Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events(GRACE) skorlamasının kullanımı

Year 2023, , 170 - 174, 29.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1374349

Abstract

Amaç: Akut koroner sendrom (AKS), genellikle koroner kan akımındaki ani bir düşüşe bağlı akut miyokard iskemisi ve/veya enfarktüs ile uyumlu bir dizi rahatsızlığa değinen kullanışlı bir operasyonel terim olarak geliştirilmiştir. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Non ST elevasyonlu Miyokart infarktüsü(NSTEMİ) ve anstabil anjina pektoris ile başvuran hastaların sonuçlarını izlemek üzere tasarlanmış uluslararası bir veritabanıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı acil serviste AKS düşünülerek takip edilen göğüs ağrılı hastalarda GRACE skorlamasının, ayaktan hastalarda majör kardiyak olayların öngörülmesinde kullanımını belirlemek ve hasta yönetiminde uygulandığında hastanın acil serviste takip süresi ve tetkik sayıları üzerine olabilecek etkilerini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, acil servisimize başvuran yetişkin (>18 yaş), hastanede veya hastane öncesinde kardiyak kökenli göğüs ağrısı şüphesi bulunan hastalar dahil edilerek, klinik, anamnez verileri ve koroner arter hastalığı risk faktörleri prospektif olarak kaydedilmiştir. GRACE skoru verilerine sahip hastaların bilgileri İos işletim sisteminde çalışan “The GRACE 2.0 ACS Risk Calculator app” ile yapılmıştır. Tüm hastalar ilk başvurudan itibaren 6 hafta içinde majör kardiyak olaylar açısından (akut miyokart enfarktüsü, perkutan koroner girişim, koroner arter bypass cerrahisi ve herhangi bir sebepten ölüm) takip edilmiştir.

Bulgular: Acil servise başvuran toplam 167 hastanın 117’si erkek (%70,1) ve 50’si kadın (%29,9)’dı. GRACE skorlarının sayısal değerleri ile majör kardiyak olay gelişmesi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki saptanmamıştır (p=0.358, t=-,922). Öte yandan iki troponin değeri negatif olan hastalarla diğer hastalar arasında GRACE skorlarının farklılığı değerlendirildiğinde arada anlamlı fark bulunmuştur(p=0.02). Troponin değeri iki kez negatif bulunan hastalar ile ikinci ve üçüncü troponin değeri pozitif bulunan hastaların acil serviste takip süreleri karşılaştırıldığında arada anlamlı fark bulunmuştur(p<0.001). İlk troponin değeri pozitif olanlar ile ikinci troponin negatif olanlar arasında takip süreleri açısından anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p=0.015).

Sonuç: GRACE skorlaması acil servise başvuran göğüs ağrılı hastaların yönetiminde sınırlı da olsa fayda sağlayabilir ancak tanı ve tedaviye katkılarının gösterilmesi için daha geniş çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

References

  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):2713-4.
  • Söderholm M, Deligani MM, Choudhary M, Björk J, Ekelund U. Ability of risk scores to predict a low complication risk in patients admitted for suspected acute coronary syndrome. Emerg Med J. 2012 Aug;29(8):644-9.
  • Halpern EJ, Deutsch JP, Hannaway MM, et al. Cardiac risk factors and risk scores vs cardiac computed tomography angiography: a prospective cohort study for triage of ED patients with acute chest pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;31(10):1479-85.
  • Shaikh MK, Hanif B, Shaikh K, Khan W, Parkash J. Validation of Grace Risk Score in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Jul;64(7):807-11.
  • Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, Gibler WB, Moll FL, Doevendans PA. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Feb;7(1):2-8.
  • Abu-Assi E, García-Acuña JM, Peña-Gil C, González-Juanatey JR. Validation of the GRACE risk score for predicting death within 6 months of follow-up in a contemporary cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):640-8.
  • Aragam KG, Tamhane UU, Kline-Rogers E, et al. Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores. PLoS One. 2009 Nov 23;4(11):e7947.
  • Ke J, Chen Y, Wang X, Wu Z, Chen F. Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2021. 18;11(8):e048356.
  • Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454.
  • Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8.
  • Celik E, Erkek A, Karakayalıgrace O, Kaya B, Yılmaz S. Determination of The Validity and Reliability of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Scores in Elderly Patıents With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department. Kocaeli Medical Journal. 9. 111-118. 10.5505/ktd.2020.02360.
  • Yanqiao L, Shen L, Yutong M, Linghong S, Ben H. Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):4.
  • Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021 Sep 29; 374, n2106.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Emergency Medicine
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Bora Kaya 0000-0001-8912-9078

Yavuz Yiğit 0000-0002-7226-983X

Emrah Çelik 0000-0001-6356-0804

Serkan Yılmaz 0000-0003-1496-6976

Early Pub Date December 29, 2023
Publication Date December 29, 2023
Submission Date October 11, 2023
Acceptance Date November 13, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

AMA Kaya B, Yiğit Y, Çelik E, Yılmaz S. Acil serviste akut koroner sendrom şüphesi olan göğüs ağrılı hastaların yönetiminde Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events(GRACE) skorlamasının kullanımı. Anatolian J Emerg Med. December 2023;6(4):170-174. doi:10.54996/anatolianjem.1374349