Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evli kadınlarda yakın partner şiddeti ve evlilik uyumu

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.29228/anatoljhr.67055

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, kadına yönelik yakın partner şiddeti (IPV) ile evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür.
Yöntem: Araştırma, basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemiyle 1057 evli kadın üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, araştırmacılar tarafından ev ziyaretleri esnasında yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında Sosyodemografik Form, Aile İçi Şiddet Ölçeği (AİŞÖ) ve Evlilik Uyumu Testi (EUT) kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Kadınların AİŞÖ toplam puan ortalamaları 61.25±10.21, EUT toplam puan ortalamaları 30.08±8.05 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırmada kadınların partner şiddeti düzeylerinin ve evlilik uyumlarının orta düzeyde olduğu saptanmıştır. Araştırmada kadınların tanımlayıcı özelliklerine göre AİŞÖ ve EUT toplam puan ortalamaları karşılaştırıldığında, araştırmaya katılan kadınların yaş, evlilik süresi, çocuk sayısı, evlilik biçimi, gelir, eş yaşı ile AİŞÖ ve EUT toplam puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmıştır (p˂.05). Bulgularımıza göre kadınların tamamı evlilikleri boyunca IPV türlerinden en az birini yaşamıştır. Eş şiddeti ile evlilik uyumu arasında istatistiksel olarak negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. (p˂.05).
Sonuçlar: Evlilik uyumu, yakın partner şiddeti ile ilişkilidir. Evlilik uyumu arttıkça, aile içi şiddet azalmaktadır.

References

  • Abramsky, T., Watts, C.H., Garcia, M. C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H., & Heise, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Finding from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health, 11, 109.
  • Afolabi, A. O. (2011). Personality and gender type as factors in mentor-protégé relationship: A psychologist’s insight. In A.A. Olowu (Ed.) Mentoring: A key concept in human resource Management (p. 76-86). Ife: Ife Centre for Psychological Studies.
  • Akar, T., Aksakal, F. N., Demirel, B., Durukan, E., & Özkan, S. (2010). The prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group woman: Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 449-60.
  • Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137-1148.
  • Bibi, S., Ashfaq, S., Shaikh, F., & Quresh, P. M. A. (2014). Prevalence, instigating factors and help seeking behavior of physical domestic violence among married women of Hyderabad, Sindh. Pakistan Journal of Medicine Sciences, 30, 301-303.
  • Cheung, A. K. L., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2016). Non-traditional wives with traditional husbands: Gender ideology and husband-towife physical violence in Chinese society. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1704-1724.
  • Çetiner, S. G. (2006). Aile içi şiddet yaşayan kadınlarda cinsel sorunlar ve intihar olasılığı [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260-1269.
  • George, J., Nair, D., Premkumar, N. R., Saravanan, N., Chinnakali, P., & Roy, G. (2016). The prevalence of domestic violence and its associated factors among married women in a rural area of Puducherry, South India. Journal of Family Medicine Prim Care, 5, 672-676.
  • Harris, R. J., Firestone, J. M., & Vega, W. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463-483.
  • Houry, D., Kemball., R., Rhodes, K. V., & Kaslow, N. J. (2006). Intimate partner violence and mental health symptoms in African American female ED patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24, 444.
  • İdiz, Z. (2009). Evlilik uyumu, evlilik yatırımı, aile içi şiddet ve intihar girişimi arasındaki bağlantıların sosyal psikolojik açıdan incelenmesi. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • İnce, Z. H., & Tüfekci, G. F. (2015). Engelli çocuğu olan ebeveynlerde evlilik uyumu ve yaşam doyumunun değerlendirilmesi ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences, 4, 102-112.
  • Jahromi M. K, Jamali S., Koshkakil A. R., & Javadpour S. (2016). Prevalence and risk factors of domestic violence against women by their husbands in Iran. Global Journal of Health Science, 28(8), 175-183.
  • Jamali, S., & Javadpour, S. (2016). The impact of intimate male partner violence on women’s sexual function: A study in Iran. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10, 12.
  • Karakula, H., Lukasik, P., & Topolska, P. K. (2017). Risk factors of anxiety and depressive symptoms in female patients experiencing intimate partner violence. Psychiatria Polska, 51(1), 63-74.
  • Kocacık, F., & Çağlayandereli, M. (2009). Ailede kadına yönelik şiddet: Denizli ili örneği. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 24-43.
  • Kublay, D., & Oktan, V. (2015). Evlilik uyumu: değer tercihleri ve öznel mutluluk açısından incelenmesi. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5, 25-35.
  • Kumcağız, H., & Güner, Z. (2017). Hemşirelerin iş doyumlarının yordayıcısı olarak sosyal destek, evlilik uyumu ve bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14, 225-249.
  • Okhakhume, A. S., Rotimi, Oguntayo., & Aroniyiaso, O. T. (2006) Influence of socio-economic status and marital satisfaction on domestic violence among couples living in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(6), 179-184.
  • Öyekçin, G. D., Yetim, D., & Şahin, M. E. (2012). Kadına yönelik farklı eş şiddeti tiplerini etkileyen psikososyal faktörler. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 23, 1-7.
  • Pun, K. D., Infanti, J. J., Kolu, R., Schei, B., & Dari, E. (2016). Community perceptions on domestic violence against pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 9, 319-324.
  • Rafael, R. M. R., Moura, A. T. M. S., Tavares, J. M. C., Ferreira, R. E. M., Camilo, G. G. D. S., & Neto, M. (2017). Profile of intimate partner violence in family health units. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 70, 1259-1267.
  • Sen, S., & Bolsoy, N. (2017). Violence against women: prevalence and risk factors in Turkish sample. BMC Womens Health, 3, 100-1008.
  • Stith, S. M., Green, N. M., Smith, D. B., & Ward, D. B. (2008). Marital satisfaction and marital discord as risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 149-160.
  • Swailes, A. L., Lehman, E. B., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S. (2017). Intimate partner violence discussions in the healthcare setting: A cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 215-220.
  • Şendil, G., & Korkut, Y. (2008). Evaluation of marital adjustment of teachers in terms of psychological well-being and some variables. Studies in Psychology, 28, 15-34.
  • Tatlılıoğlu, K., & Küçükköse, I. (2015). The violence against the women in Turkey: The reasons, protections, prevention and interventıon services. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(13),194-209.
  • Titilayo, A., Anoudo, O. O., & Palamuleni, M. E. (2017). Family type, domestic violence and under-five mortality in Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 17, 538-548.
  • Tiwari, P., & Asthana, M. (2016). Marital adjusment and domestic violence: A correlation study. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 7(11), 1107-1109.
  • Tutarel Kışlak, Ş. (1999). Evlilikte uyum ölçeğinin (EUÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Dergisi, 7, 50-57.
  • Weingourt, R., Maruyama, T., Sawada, I., & Yoshino, J. (2001). Domestic violence and women’s mental health in Japan. International Nursing Review, 48, 102-108.
  • Weldon, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2012). Implicit theories in intimate partner violence offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 761-772.
  • Williams, S., & Frieze, I. (2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52(11), 771-784.
  • World Health Organization. (2017). Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Retrived from 14.05.2018.
  • Yalçın, H. (2014). Evlilik uyumu ile sosyodemografik özellikler arasındaki ilişki. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3, 24-30.
  • Yeşiltepe, S. S., & Çelik, M. (2014). Öğretmenlerin evlilik uyumlarının psikolojik iyi olma ve bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 13, 992-1013.
  • Yildizhan, R., Adali, E., Kolusari, A., Kurdoglu, M., Yildizhan, B., & Şahin, G. (2009). Domestic violence against infertile women in a Turkish setting. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 104(2), 110-112.

The intimate partner violence and marital adjustment on married women

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.29228/anatoljhr.67055

Abstract

Aim: This study was determined the relationship between intimate partner violence against women (IPV) and marital adjustment.
Methods: The research conducted that 1057 married women with simple random sampling method. The data were created face to face interview method by the researchers making home visits between December 2017 and November 2018. The data were collected by using the Sociodemographic Form, Domestic Violence Scale (DVS) and Marital Adjustment Test (MAT).
Results: Womens' mean DVS total mean score was found to be 61.25±10.21, MAT total mean score was found to be 30.08±8.05. In the study, it was found that intimate partner violence levels of the women and their married adjustment were moderate. In the study, when the total mean scores of DVS and MAT were compared according to the descriptive characteristics of the women, a statistically significant difference was found between the age, length of marriage, number of children, type of marriage, income, husband's age, and the total score points of the women participating in the study (p˂.05). According to our findings, all of the women experienced at least one type of IPV during their marriage. There is a statistically negative and significant relationship between spousal violence and marital adjustment (p˂.05).
Conclusion: Marital adjustment is associated with intimate partner violence. As marital adjustment increases, IPV decreases.

References

  • Abramsky, T., Watts, C.H., Garcia, M. C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H., & Heise, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Finding from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health, 11, 109.
  • Afolabi, A. O. (2011). Personality and gender type as factors in mentor-protégé relationship: A psychologist’s insight. In A.A. Olowu (Ed.) Mentoring: A key concept in human resource Management (p. 76-86). Ife: Ife Centre for Psychological Studies.
  • Akar, T., Aksakal, F. N., Demirel, B., Durukan, E., & Özkan, S. (2010). The prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group woman: Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 449-60.
  • Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137-1148.
  • Bibi, S., Ashfaq, S., Shaikh, F., & Quresh, P. M. A. (2014). Prevalence, instigating factors and help seeking behavior of physical domestic violence among married women of Hyderabad, Sindh. Pakistan Journal of Medicine Sciences, 30, 301-303.
  • Cheung, A. K. L., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2016). Non-traditional wives with traditional husbands: Gender ideology and husband-towife physical violence in Chinese society. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1704-1724.
  • Çetiner, S. G. (2006). Aile içi şiddet yaşayan kadınlarda cinsel sorunlar ve intihar olasılığı [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260-1269.
  • George, J., Nair, D., Premkumar, N. R., Saravanan, N., Chinnakali, P., & Roy, G. (2016). The prevalence of domestic violence and its associated factors among married women in a rural area of Puducherry, South India. Journal of Family Medicine Prim Care, 5, 672-676.
  • Harris, R. J., Firestone, J. M., & Vega, W. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463-483.
  • Houry, D., Kemball., R., Rhodes, K. V., & Kaslow, N. J. (2006). Intimate partner violence and mental health symptoms in African American female ED patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24, 444.
  • İdiz, Z. (2009). Evlilik uyumu, evlilik yatırımı, aile içi şiddet ve intihar girişimi arasındaki bağlantıların sosyal psikolojik açıdan incelenmesi. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • İnce, Z. H., & Tüfekci, G. F. (2015). Engelli çocuğu olan ebeveynlerde evlilik uyumu ve yaşam doyumunun değerlendirilmesi ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences, 4, 102-112.
  • Jahromi M. K, Jamali S., Koshkakil A. R., & Javadpour S. (2016). Prevalence and risk factors of domestic violence against women by their husbands in Iran. Global Journal of Health Science, 28(8), 175-183.
  • Jamali, S., & Javadpour, S. (2016). The impact of intimate male partner violence on women’s sexual function: A study in Iran. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10, 12.
  • Karakula, H., Lukasik, P., & Topolska, P. K. (2017). Risk factors of anxiety and depressive symptoms in female patients experiencing intimate partner violence. Psychiatria Polska, 51(1), 63-74.
  • Kocacık, F., & Çağlayandereli, M. (2009). Ailede kadına yönelik şiddet: Denizli ili örneği. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 24-43.
  • Kublay, D., & Oktan, V. (2015). Evlilik uyumu: değer tercihleri ve öznel mutluluk açısından incelenmesi. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5, 25-35.
  • Kumcağız, H., & Güner, Z. (2017). Hemşirelerin iş doyumlarının yordayıcısı olarak sosyal destek, evlilik uyumu ve bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 14, 225-249.
  • Okhakhume, A. S., Rotimi, Oguntayo., & Aroniyiaso, O. T. (2006) Influence of socio-economic status and marital satisfaction on domestic violence among couples living in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(6), 179-184.
  • Öyekçin, G. D., Yetim, D., & Şahin, M. E. (2012). Kadına yönelik farklı eş şiddeti tiplerini etkileyen psikososyal faktörler. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 23, 1-7.
  • Pun, K. D., Infanti, J. J., Kolu, R., Schei, B., & Dari, E. (2016). Community perceptions on domestic violence against pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 9, 319-324.
  • Rafael, R. M. R., Moura, A. T. M. S., Tavares, J. M. C., Ferreira, R. E. M., Camilo, G. G. D. S., & Neto, M. (2017). Profile of intimate partner violence in family health units. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 70, 1259-1267.
  • Sen, S., & Bolsoy, N. (2017). Violence against women: prevalence and risk factors in Turkish sample. BMC Womens Health, 3, 100-1008.
  • Stith, S. M., Green, N. M., Smith, D. B., & Ward, D. B. (2008). Marital satisfaction and marital discord as risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 149-160.
  • Swailes, A. L., Lehman, E. B., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S. (2017). Intimate partner violence discussions in the healthcare setting: A cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 215-220.
  • Şendil, G., & Korkut, Y. (2008). Evaluation of marital adjustment of teachers in terms of psychological well-being and some variables. Studies in Psychology, 28, 15-34.
  • Tatlılıoğlu, K., & Küçükköse, I. (2015). The violence against the women in Turkey: The reasons, protections, prevention and interventıon services. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(13),194-209.
  • Titilayo, A., Anoudo, O. O., & Palamuleni, M. E. (2017). Family type, domestic violence and under-five mortality in Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 17, 538-548.
  • Tiwari, P., & Asthana, M. (2016). Marital adjusment and domestic violence: A correlation study. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 7(11), 1107-1109.
  • Tutarel Kışlak, Ş. (1999). Evlilikte uyum ölçeğinin (EUÖ) güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3P Dergisi, 7, 50-57.
  • Weingourt, R., Maruyama, T., Sawada, I., & Yoshino, J. (2001). Domestic violence and women’s mental health in Japan. International Nursing Review, 48, 102-108.
  • Weldon, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2012). Implicit theories in intimate partner violence offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 761-772.
  • Williams, S., & Frieze, I. (2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52(11), 771-784.
  • World Health Organization. (2017). Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Retrived from 14.05.2018.
  • Yalçın, H. (2014). Evlilik uyumu ile sosyodemografik özellikler arasındaki ilişki. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3, 24-30.
  • Yeşiltepe, S. S., & Çelik, M. (2014). Öğretmenlerin evlilik uyumlarının psikolojik iyi olma ve bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 13, 992-1013.
  • Yildizhan, R., Adali, E., Kolusari, A., Kurdoglu, M., Yildizhan, B., & Şahin, G. (2009). Domestic violence against infertile women in a Turkish setting. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 104(2), 110-112.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Public Health (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Aysel Akbeniz 0000-0001-5163-5258

Abdurrezzak Gültekin 0000-0002-0085-3519

Pınar Harmancı 0000-0002-9243-4695

Funda Kavak Budak 0000-0002-2159-0180

Publication Date April 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Akbeniz, A., Gültekin, A., Harmancı, P., Kavak Budak, F. (2023). The intimate partner violence and marital adjustment on married women. Anatolian Journal of Health Research, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29228/anatoljhr.67055

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License

30818