Research Article

The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing

Volume: 2 Number: 1 October 1, 2008
  • Ray W. Guillery
EN

The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing

Abstract

In many contemporary studies and textbooks perceptual processing is treated as a ‘pure sensory’ phenomenon, one that can be understood on the basis of pathways passing information from the sensory periphery to the cerebral cortex, for processing within the cortex and subsequent passage to motor centers or memory stores. However, many physiologists, psychologists and philosophers have recognized perceptual processing as closely dependent upon action (e.g. the ‘sensorimotor contingencies’ of O’Regan and Noë, 2001)1 , although the anatomical nature of the functional links is generally left unresolved. A survey of pathways that pass messages through the thalamus to the cerebral cortex (visual, tactile etc.) shows that these are not ‘pure sensory’ pathways. They are generally branching axons that convey messages to lower, motor centers with one branch and to the thalamus with the other. That is, since the two branches will be transmitting the same message, the thalamic relay receives information not only about sensory events but also about concurrent instructions that are on the way to motor centers. This dual information, about sensory events and motor instructions, is an implicit part of the message that the thalamus passes to cortex. The axonal branching patterns reveal an anatomical basis of sensorimotor contingencies, which cortical mechanisms are not likely to ignore even when experimental studies do not reveal them.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ray W. Guillery This is me

Publication Date

October 1, 2008

Submission Date

June 20, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2008 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Guillery, R. W. (2008). The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing. Anatomy, 2(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.009
AMA
1.Guillery RW. The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing. Anatomy. 2008;2(1):9-15. doi:10.2399/ana.08.009
Chicago
Guillery, Ray W. 2008. “The Contributions of Anatomical Studies to Knowledge of Perceptual Processing”. Anatomy 2 (1): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.009.
EndNote
Guillery RW (October 1, 2008) The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing. Anatomy 2 1 9–15.
IEEE
[1]R. W. Guillery, “The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing”, Anatomy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–15, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.2399/ana.08.009.
ISNAD
Guillery, Ray W. “The Contributions of Anatomical Studies to Knowledge of Perceptual Processing”. Anatomy 2/1 (October 1, 2008): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.009.
JAMA
1.Guillery RW. The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing. Anatomy. 2008;2:9–15.
MLA
Guillery, Ray W. “The Contributions of Anatomical Studies to Knowledge of Perceptual Processing”. Anatomy, vol. 2, no. 1, Oct. 2008, pp. 9-15, doi:10.2399/ana.08.009.
Vancouver
1.Ray W. Guillery. The contributions of anatomical studies to knowledge of perceptual processing. Anatomy. 2008 Oct. 1;2(1):9-15. doi:10.2399/ana.08.009

Anatomy is the official journal of Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy (TSACA).