COMMENTS ON THE LIMITS AND INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF THE MAMMALIAN MIDBRAIN

Abstract

The anatomic concept of the midbrain has changed considerably in recent times, due to advances in molecular developmental neurobiology which have shown the mechanisms that pattern the midbrain relative to diencephalon and hindbrain, as well as relative to its inner structure. The midbrain unitary developmental field that was discovered in this way is smaller than the classic concept of the midbrain, which therefore necessarily included portions of the caudal diencephalon and the rostral prepontine hindbrain. These developmental mechanisms are summarized, the correct boundaries defined, and the diencephalic and hindbrain structures that were wrongly ascribed to the midbrain are illustrated schematically and classified properly as to their origins. Finally, the internal structure of the modern midbrain is treated systematically in terms of dorsoventral and anteroposterior regionalization.

Keywords

• boundaries
• derivatives
• diencephalon
• hindbrain
• midbrain
• neuromeres
• patterning
• regionalization

References

1. Puelles L. Plan of the developing vertebrate nervous system, relating
2. embryology to the adult nervous system (Prosomere model,
3. overview of brain organization). In: Rubenstein JLR, Rakic P, editors.
4. Comprehensive developmental neuroscience: Patterning and
5. cell type specification in the developing CNS and PNS. Amsterdam:
6. Academic Press; 2013. p. 187–209.
7. His W. Über das frontale Ende des Gehirnrohrs. Archiv für
8. Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte [Anatomische Abteilung des

9. Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol. 1893b] 1893;3:157–71.
10. His W. Die Entwicklung des menschlichen Gehirns während der
11. ersten Monate. Leipzig: Hirzel Verlag; 1904.
12. Orr HJ. Contribution to the embryology of the lizard; with especial
13. reference to the central nervous system and some organs of the head;
14. together with observations on the origin of the vertebrates. J Morphol
15. ;1:311–72.
16. Charles FW, McClure BA. The segmentation of the primitive vertebrate
17. brain. J Morphol 1890;4:35–56.
18. Locy WA. Contribution to the structure and development of the
19. vertebrate head. Boston: Ginn and Co; 1895.
20. von Kupffer C. Die Morphogenie des Zentralnervensystems. In:
21. Hertwig O, editor. Handbuch der vergleichenden und experimentellen
22. Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere. Vol. 2, Part 3. Jena:
23. Fischer Verlag; 1906. p. 1–272.
24. Ziehen T. Die Morphogenie des Zentralnervensystems der
25. Säugetiere. In: Hertwig O, editor. Handbuch der vergleichenden
26. und experimentellen Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere. Vol. 2,
27. Part 3. Jena: Fischer Verlag; 1906. p. 273–351.
28. Palmgren A. Embryological and morphological studies on the midbrain
29. and cerebellum of vertebrates. Acta Zool 1921;2:1–94.
30. Puelles E, Martinez-de-la-Torre M, Watson C, Puelles L. Midbrain.
31. In: Watson C, Paxinos G, Puelles L editors. The mouse nervous system.
32. San Diego: Academic Press Elsevier; 2012. p. 337– 59.
33. Vaage S. The segmentation of the primitive neural tube in chick
34. embryos (Gallus domesticus). A morphological, histochemical and
35. autoradiographical investigation. Ergebn Anat Entwicklungsgesch
36. ;41:3–87.
37. Vaage S. The histogenesis of the isthmic nuclei in chick embryos
38. (Gallus domesticus). I. A morphological study. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch
39. ;142:283–314.
40. Puelles L, Martínez-de-la-Torre M. Autoradiographic and Golgi
41. study on the early development of n. isthmi principalis and adjacent
42. grisea in the chick embryo: a tridimensional viewpoint. Anat Embryol
43. (Berl) 1987; 176:19–34.
44. Hidalgo-Sánchez M, Martínez-de-la-Torre M, Alvarado-Mallart
45. RM, Puelles L. Distinct pre-isthmic domain, defined by overlap of Otx2 and Pax2 expression domains in the chicken caudal midbrain. J
46. Comp Neurol 2005;483:17–29.
47. Rendahl H. Embryologische und morphologische Studien über das
48. Zwischenhirn beim Huhn. Acta Zool 1924;5:241–344.
49. Puelles L, Amat JA, Martínez-de-la-Torre M. Segment-related,
50. mosaic neurogenetic pattern in the forebrain and mesencephalon of
51. early chick embryos. I. Topography of AChE-positive neuroblasts up
52. to stage HH18. J Comp Neurol 1987;266:147–268.
53. García-Lopez R, Vieira C, Echevarria D, Martinez S. Fate map of
54. the diencephalon and the zona limitans at the 10-somites stage in
55. chick embryos. Dev Biol 2004;268:514–30.
56. Ferran JL, Sánchez-Arrones L, Sandoval JE, Puelles L. A model of
57. early molecular regionalization in the chicken embryonic pretectum.
58. J Comp Neurol 2007;505:379–403.
59. Ferran JL, Sánchez-Arrones L, Bardet SM, Sandoval J, Martínez-dela-
60. Torre M, Puelles L. Early pretectal gene expression pattern shows
61. a conserved anteroposterior tripartition in mouse and chicken. Brain
62. Res Bull 2008;75:295–8.
63. Ferran JL, de Oliveira ED, Merchán P, Sandoval JE, Sánchez-
64. Arrones L, Martínez-De-La-Torre M, Puelles L. Geno-architectonic
65. analysis of regional histogenesis in the chicken pretectum. J Comp
66. Neurol 2009;517:405–51.
67. Herrick CJ. The morphology of the forebrain in amphibia and reptilia.
68. J Comp Neurol 1910;20:413–547.
69. Kuhlenbeck H. The central nervous system of vertebrates. Vol. 3,
70. Part II: overall morphological pattern. Basel (Switzerland): Karger;
71. Saldaña E, Viñuela A, Marshall AF, Fitzpatrick DC, Aparicio MA.
72. The TLC: a novel auditory nucleus of the mammalian brain. J
73. Neurosci 2007;27:13108–16.
74. Puelles L, Malagón F, Genis-Gálvez JM. The migration of oculomotor
75. neuroblasts across the midline in the chick embryo. Exp
76. Neurol 1975;47:459–69.
77. Puelles L, Privat J. Do oculomotor neuroblasts migrate across the
78. midline in the fetal rat brain? Anat Embryol (Berl) 1977;150:187–206.
79. Puelles L. A Golgi-study of oculomotor neuroblasts migrating across
80. the midline in chick embryos. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1978;152:205–15.
81. Alonso A, Merchán P, Sandoval JE, Sánchez-Arrones L, Garcia-
82. Cazorla A, Artuch R, Ferrán JL, Martínez-de-la-Torre M, Puelles L.
83. Development of the serotonergic cells in murine raphe nuclei and
84. their relations with rhombomeric domains. Brain Struct Funct
85. ;218:1229–77.
86. Martínez S, Puelles E, Puelles L, Echevarria D. Molecular regionalization of developing neural tube. In: Watson C, Paxinos G, Puelles L, editors. The mouse nervous system. San Diego: Academic Press Elsevier; 2012. p. 2–18.