Reporting detailed information and acknowledging donor-cadavers: good practice recommendation for anatomists

Year 2016, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 177 - 181, 30.12.2016

İlke Ali Gürses Esranur Korkmaz , Adnan Öztürk

Abstract

Objectives: In order to facilitate a healthy and trusting relationship between anatomists and their society, appreciating the anatomical gift of the individuals that donated their bodies to science in every way possible remains central. Apart from memorial services and monuments, scientific articles themselves can be a good platform to show this appreciation. In this article, we aimed to an create and awareness among anatomists and researchers by evaluating the information given regarding donor-cadavers in their articles and see if they acknowledged them.

Methods: We evaluated all articles that used human cadaveric specimens by Turkish anatomists published between January 2011 and April 2016 and assessed if researchers provided data on the age, gender, preservation technique(s), source, and ethical / legal permissions regarding the cadavers used.

Results: Majority of the articles provided data about gender (74.5%) and age (68.9%). Preservation technique (56.6%) and source of specimens (50.5%) were reported less frequently. While 28.3% of the articles provided data on some form of ethical approval, only 11.8% of the articles provided data on the consent of the individuals. Ten (4.7%) articles acknowledged the cadavers and/or their families.

Conclusion: We believe it is the duty of anatomists to promote body donation within their society by building a trustworthy relationship. Scientific articles that depend on donor-cadavers should also be used to promote this relationship. Therefore, awareness among anatomists should be raised to discuss ethical grounds for scientific research on cadavers.

Keywords

anatomy, cadaver, guideline, medical ethics, research

References

• 1. Dyer GSM, Thorndike EL. Quidne mortui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad Med 2000;75:969–70.
• 2. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007;41:15–22.
• 3. Hildebrandt S. What is happening in our anatomical dissection rooms? Clin Anat 2014;27:833–4.
• 4. Lemmp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ 2005;39:318–25.
• 5. Winkelmann A, Heinze AK, Hendrix S. Acknowledging tissue donation: human cadaveric specimens in musculoskeletal research. Clin Anat 2016;29:65–9.
• 6. Jones TW, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Honoring our donors: a survey of memorial ceremonies in United States anatomy programs. Anat Sci Educ 2013;7:219–23.
• 7. Subasinghe SK, Jones DG. Human body donation programs in Sri Lanka: Buddhist perspectives. Anat Sci Educ 2015;8:484–9.
• 8. Bohl M, Holman A, Mueller DA, Gruppen LD, Hildebrandt S. The willed body donor interview project: medical student and donor expectations. Anat Sci Educ 2012;6:90–100.
• 9. Talarico EF. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat 2013;26:161–72.
• 10. Bolt S. Bodies does matter: Gift giving and the unveiling of body donor monuments in the Netherlands. Med Anthropol Q 2012;26: 613–34.
• 11. Gürses ‹A, Coflkun O, Gürtekin B, Kale A. The amount of information provided in articles published in Clinical Anatomy and Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy regarding human cadaveric materials and trends in acknowledging donors/cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;8: 1225–31.
• 12. Google Scholar [database on the Internet]. Mountain View (CA): c2004 Google Inc; [cited 2016, Apr 20]. Available from: http://www. scholar.google.com
• 13. Benninger B. Formally acknowledging donor-cadaver-patients in the basic and clinical science research arena. Clin Anat 2013;26:810–3.
• 14. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud MM, Laforet E, Riedere BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate- Oliver F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ. The legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe – A review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 2008;12:1–24.
• 15. Riederer BM. Body donations today and tomorrow: what is best practice and why? Clin Anat 2016;29:11–8.
• 16. Organ ve doku alınması, saklanması, aşılanması ve nakli hakkında kanun. Kanun numarası: 2238. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Mevzuat Metin/1.5.2238.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
• 17. Sağlık Bakanlığı ve bağlı kuruluşların teşkilat ve görevleri hakkında kanun hükmünde karaname ile bazı kanunlarda değişliklik yapılmasına dair kanun. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/ 2014/01/20140118.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
• 18. Çubukçu B. Kadavras›z anatomi dersi. Al Jazeera Turk 09 February 2016 http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/al-jazeera-ozel/kadavrasiz-anatomidersi Accessed 20 April 2016
• 19. Hürriyet. Doktor adaylarına ithal kadavra. Hürriyet Kelebek. 23 January 2016 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/doktor-adaylarina-ithalkadavra- 40044207 Accessed 20 April 2016
• 20. Sözcü. Çin’den kadavra ithal edeceğiz. Sözcü Gazetesi. 28 April 2015. http://www.sozcu.com.tr/2015/gundem/cinden-kadavra-ithaledecegiz- 816673/ Accessed 20 April 2016
• 21. Champney TH. The business of bodies: ethical perspectives on forprofit body donation companies. Clin Anat 2016;29:25–9
• 22. İnsan cesedi üzerinde bilimsel araştırrma yapılmasına ilişkin yönetmelik. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home=http://www. resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf&main=http://www.resmigazete. gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
• 23. TÜBİTAK. Etik kurul onay belgesi bilgi notu. Temmuz 2014. http://tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/etik_onay_bilgi_notu_23_07_ 13.pdf Accessed 22 December 2016
• 24. Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Etik kurul yönlendirme flemas›. http://sbe.bezmialem.edu.tr/Documents/BVU_ Etik_Kurul_Yonlendirme_Semasi-r.pdf Accessed 22 December 2016
• 25. Champney TH. A proposal for a policy on the ethical care and use of cadavers and their tissues. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:49–52.
• 26. International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. (2012) Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus January 2012:4-5. http://ifaa.net/index.php/plexus/finish/3-plexus/3-plexus- 2012/0 Accessed 20 April 2016
• 27. Jones DG. Searching for good practice recommendations on body donation across diverse cultures. Clin Anat 2016;29:55–9.
• 28. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: Reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clin Anat 2012;25:246–54.
• 29. Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy. Ulusal Anatomi Haftası Basın Bildirgesi 2012 http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/ kadavra-bagisi-ve-temini Accessed 20 April 2016
• 30. Erenoğlu C. Herkes onu konuşuyor! HaberTürk Pazar 02.09.2012 http://www.haberturk.com/saglik/haber/772940-herkes-onukonusuyor Accessed 20 April 2016
• 31. Defining the role of authors and contributions [homepage on the Internet]. Philadelphia: c2015 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; [updated 2006 May 26; cited 2016 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org. Accessed 20 April 2016