White to white cornea diameter and mesopic pupil size in patients with keratoconus

Year 2022, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 159 - 164, 20.12.2022

Ferah Özçelik , Tolga Yılmaz , Güneş Gümüş

Abstract

Objectives: Keratoconus is characterized by the abnormal cornea structure and it is manifested by changes in anterior segment parameters responsible for ocular high order spherical aberrations. The aim of the study is to investigate cornea horizontal white to white diameter and mesopic pupil size in patients with keratoconus.
Methods: The medical records of each participant were reviewed. The horizontal white to white cornea diameter and the mesopic pupil size were measured with the Sirius Topography System in 215 eyes of 123 subjects. Two groups were formed, the first group included 113 eyes with keratoconus and the second group is composed of 102 healthy eyes. Differences in sex, age, cornea diameter and mesopic pupil size between two groups were analyzed statistically.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in sex and age distribution between the two groups (p>0.05). The average horizontal corneal diameter was 11.98±0.33 mm in the 1st group and 11.81±0.24 mm in group 2. It was significantly higher in patients with keratoconus than in healthy subjects. (p=0.04) The mean mesopic pupil size was 3.64±0.12 mm in group 1 and it was 3.73±0.14 mm in group 2. The mesopic pupil size was significantly higher in healthy subjects than in patients with keratoconus (p=0.03).
Conclusion: This study showed that while the horizontal white to white diameter of the cornea increases in keratoconus, the mesopic pupil size decreases. In clinical practice, these two parameters should be considered in treatment procedures of patients with keratoconus.

Keywords

cornea topography, horizontal cornea diameter, keratoconus, mesopic pupil size

References

• Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:374–80.
• Rüfer F, Schröder A, Erb C. White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 2005;24:259–61.
• De Silva DJ, Khaw PT, Brookes JL. Long term outcome of primary congenital glaucoma. JAAPOS 2011;15:148–52.
• Allemann N, Chamon W, Tanaka HM, Mori ES, Campos M, Schor P, Baikoff G. Myopic angle-supported intraocular lenses: two-year follow-up. Ophtalmology 2000;107:1549–54.
• Rosen E, Gore C. Staar collamer posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens to correct myopia and hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:596–606.
• Paryani MJ, Kharbanda V, Kummelil MK, Wadia K, Darak AB. Pupillodynamics and corneal spherical aberrations in a set of Indian cataract patients and its implications for aberrometric customisation of intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:3012–5.
• Haw WW, Manche EE. Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:907–15.
• Cakmak HB, Cagil N, Simavli H, Raza S. Corneal white-to-white distance and mesopic pupil diameter. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:505–9.
• Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A. Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye (Lond) 2015;29:843–59.
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297–319.
• Miháltz K, Kovács I, Kránitz K, Erdei G, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. Mechanism of aberration balance and the effect on retinal image quality in keratoconus: optical and visual characteristics of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:914–22.
• Hashemia H, Khabazkhooba M, Emamianb MH, Shariatic M, Yektad A, Fotouhie A. White-to-white corneal diameter distribution in an adult population. J Curr Ophthalmol 2015;27:21–4.
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A. White-to-white corneal diameter in the Tehran eye study. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:378–85.
• Wang L, Auffarth GU. White-to-white corneal diameter measurements using the eyemetrics program of the Orbscan topography system. Dev Ophthalmol 2002;34:141–6.
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Zagrada D, Budde W, Kus M. Corneal dimensions in patients with various types of corneal dystrophies and their impact on penetrating keratoplasty [Article in German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2000;217:152–8.
• Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Martinez-Soriano F. White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 2012;34:167–70.
• Lee DW, Kim JM, Choi CY, Shin D, Park KH, Cho JG. Age-related changes of ocular parameters in Korean subjects. Clin Ophthalmol 2010;4:725–30.
• Sulutvedt U, Zavagno D, Lubell J, Leknes S, de Rodez Benavent SA, Laeng B. Brightness perception changes related to pupil size.Vision Res 2021;178:41–7.
• Guler Alis M, Alis AJ. Compatibility of pupil size measured with Nidek ARK-1a table top autorefractometer and Plusoptix A12C photoscreene. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil 2021;71:161–6.
• Mathot S, Fabius J, Heusden EV, Van der Stigchel S. Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data. Behav Res Methods 2018;50:94–106.
• Guillon M, Dumbleton K, Theodoratos P, Gobbe M, Wooley CB, Moody K. The effects of age, refractive status, and luminance on pupil size. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93:1093–100.
• Cakmak HB, Cagil N, Simavli H, Duzen B, Simsek S. Refractive error may influence mesopic pupil size. Curr Eye Res 2010;35:130–6.
• Netto MV, Ambrosio Jr R, Wilson SE. Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 2004;20:337–42.
• Biçer GY, Zor KR, Küçük E. Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022;70:3575–8.
• Linke SJ, Baviera J, Munzer G, Fricke OH, Richard G, Katz T. Mesopic pupil size in a refractive surgery population (13,959 eyes). Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1156–64.
• Tekin K, Sekeroglu MA, Kiziltoprak H, Doguizi S, Inanc M, Yilmazbas P. Static and dynamic pupillometry data of healthy individuals. Clin Exp Optom 2018;101:659–65.
• Birren J, Casperson R J. Age changes in pupil size. J Gerontol 1950;5:216–21.
• Kiel M, Grabitz SD, Hopf S, Koeck T, Wild PS, Schmidtmann I, Lackner KJ, Munzel T, Manfred E. Beutel ME, Pfeiffer N, Alexander K, Schuster AK. Distribution of pupil size and associated factors: results from the population-based gutenberg health study. J Ophthalmol 2022;9:9520512.
• Alarcón A, Rubiño M, Pééérez-Ocón F, Jiménez JR. Theoretical analysis of the effect of pupil size, initial myopic level, and optical zone on quality of vision after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2012;28:901–6.
• Lee YS, Kim HJ, Lim DK, Kim MH, Lee KJ. Age-specific influences of refractive error and illuminance on pupil diameter. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29859.
• Hondur G, Cagil N, Sarac O, Ozcan ME, Kosekahya P. Pupillary offset in keratoconus and its relationship with clinical and topographical features. Curr Eye Res 2017;42:708–12.
• Mihaltz K, Kranitz K, Kovacs I, Takács A, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. Shifting of the line of sight in keratoconus measured by a hartmann-shack sensor. Ophthalmology 2010;117:41–8.
• Schmitz S, Krummenauer F, Henn S, Dick HB. Comparison of three different technologies for pupil diameter measurement. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:472–7.
• Fernández-Velázquez F. Performance and predictability of a new large diameter contact lens design in keratoconic corneae. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019;42:289–94.
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Zagrada D, Budde W, Kus MM. Corneal dimensions in various types of corneal dystrophies and their effect on penetrating keratoplasty [Article in German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2000;217:152–8.
• Monsálvez-Romín D, González-Méijome JM, Esteve-Taboada JJ, García-Lázaro S, Cerviño A. Light distortion of soft multifocal contact lenses with different pupil size and shape. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020;43:130–6.