Correlation between morphometry of fetal foot and gestational age: a cadaver study

Year 2024, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 51 - 60, 30.08.2024

Abdurrahim Eyüp Canbaloğlu , Ahmet Dursun , Kenan Öztürk , Yadigar Kastamoni

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted on a collection of fetal cadavers to describe the relationship between gestational age and foot parameters specifically in the Turkish population.
Methods: The study involved 83 fetal cadavers (45 males, 38 females) ranging from 13 to 40 weeks of gestation, without external anomalies or pathologies. Various foot parameters were measured, including foot width (FW), heel width (HW), foot length (FL), heel-metatarsophalangeal fold (HMF), bimalleolar width (BW), foot dorsum length (FDL), ankle-metatarsophalangeal fold (AMF), malleolus medialis height (MMH), malleolus lateralis height (MLH), and finger length (FiL). These parameters were measured using a digital caliper with a precision of 0.01 mm. The fetuses were grouped by gestational month, and morphometric measurements were taken.
Results: A strong and positive correlation was found between all foot parameters and gestational age (months). All parameters increased consistently throughout the fetal period. No significant differences were observed based on gender or side comparisons for any of the parameters. Linear regression equations were developed to estimate gestational age using fetal foot parameters. These parameters explained 72% to 90% of the variation in gestational age.
Conclusion: Fetal foot length and related foot parameters can reliably be used to estimate gestational age. Due to the simplicity of these measurements, fetal foot parameters can be utilized to estimate age for babies born outside a hospital setting without the need for specialist equipment. Additionally, for premature babies receiving treatment in neonatal units, foot measurements offer a practical and easily accessible method for age estimation.

Keywords

fetus, foot length, gestational age, morphometry

References

• Agnihotri D, Dubey A, Singh D, Jethani SL. A study of correlation between anthropometric measurements of fetal limbs and gestational age of the fetus. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy 2019;8:27–31.
• Pettker CM, Goldberg JD, El-Sayed YY, Copel JA. Methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:967–8.
• Wyk LV, Smith J. Postnatal foot length to determine gestational age: a pilot study. J Trop Pediatr 2016;62:144–51.
• Majmudar DK, Vaidya CV, Sanghrajka VJ. Accuracy of foetal foot length and femur/foot length ratio in usg estimation of gestational age. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine and Radiology 2019;4:B111–3.
• Drey EA, Kang MS, McFarland W, Darney PD. Improving the accuracy of fetal foot length to confirm gestational duration. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:773–8.
• Stevens K, Elia J, Kaneshiro B, Salcedo J, Soon R, Tschann M. Updating fetal foot length to gestational age references: a chart review of abortion cases from 2012 to 2014. Contraception 2020;101:10–3.
• Kwon JY, Park IY, Wie JH, Choe S, Kim CJ, Shin JC. Fetal biometry in the Korean population: reference charts and comparison with charts from other populations. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:927–34.
• Chavan N, Kothari R, Mhaske SN, Aher G. The correlation of foot length and gestational age. VIMS Health Science Journal 2019;6:74–6.
• Adhvaryu M, Adhvaryu A, Rathod SP, Chauhan PR. A study of sonographic evaluation of fetal femur length for estimation of gestational age. International Journal of Anatomy and Research 2019;7:6621–6.
• Malas M, Desticioğlu K, Cankara N, Evcil E, Özgüner G. Fetal dönemde fetal yaşın belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;14:20–4.
• Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Berman SJ, Rosenwaks Z, Chervenak FA. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:975–8.
• Ziylan T, Murshid KA. An assessment of femur growth parameters in human fetuses and their relationship to gestational age. Turk J Med Sci 2003;33:27–32.
• Domjanic J, Seidler H, Mitteroecker P. A combined morphometric analysis of foot form and its association with sex, stature, and body mass. Am J Phys Anthropol 2015;157:582–91.
• Krauss I, Grau S, Mauch M, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Sex-related differences in foot shape. Ergonomics 2008;51:1693–1709.
• Mauch M, Grau S, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1068–75.
• Tuncer I. The development of the extremities of Turkish fetuses during the fetal period. International Journal of Medical and Health Research 2017;70–3.
• Gebeşçe A, Uslu H, Keleş E, Demirdöven M, Tonbul A, Baştürk B, Yazgan H. Evaluation of very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital. Dicle Medical Journal 2015;42:137–42.
• Shah A, Lakshmi, Mallikarjunappa, Arafat H, Rb R, Magaluri P. Fetal gestational age estimation by fetal foot length measurement and fetal femur to foot length ratio in South Indian population-a prospective study. International Journal of Scientific Research 2019;8:56–8.
• Xu M, Li JX, Hong Y, Wang L. Foot morphology in Chinese adolescents aged between 13 to 18 years varies by gender and age. Med Sci Monit 2019;25:938–45.
• Tomassoni D, Traini E, Amenta F. Gender and age related differences in foot morphology. Maturitas 2014;79:421–7.
• Chiroma SM, Philip J, Attah OO, Dibal NI. Comparison of the foot height, length, breadth and foot types between males and females Ga’anda people, Adamawa, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2015;14:89–93.
• Krishan K, Kanchan T, Passi N, DiMaggio JA. Sexual dimorphism in foot length ratios among North Indian adolescents. J Forensic Leg Med 2015;36:96–101.
• Saghazadeh M, Kitano N, Okura T. Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner. J Foot Ankle Res 2015;8:29.
• Lee YC, Wang MJ. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data. Ergonomics 2015;58:513–23.
• Kağnıcıoğlu CH, Altay E. Türkiye’de ayakkabı tasarımında kullanılan ölçüler ile Türk insanının antropometrik ayak ölçülerinin karşılaştırılması: 0–3 yaş bireyler üzerinden bir analiz. Fırat University Journal of Science 2013;25:77–85.
• Asadujjaman M, Al Noman SN, Molla MBA. Stature estimation from foot anthropometric measurements in Bangladeshi population. Ir J Med Sci 2020;189:365–72.
• Borgohain L, George CRA. Ultrasonographic correlation of fetal foot length and gestational age (GA) in Indian population. International Journal Dental and Medical Sciences Research 2021;3:1622–31.
• Sharma V, Saxena R, Gaur P. Fetal foot length for assessment of gestational age: a cross sectional study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021;10:3153–7.
• Rubab N, Anjum, MN, Ahmed M, Fatima M. Estimation of gestational age from fetal foot length measurement. Pakistan Biomedical Journal 2022;5:380–4.
• Wong HS. A revisit of the fetal foot length and fetal measurements in early pregnancy sonography. Int J Womens Health 2017;9:199–204.