Güncel Dentin Bağlayıcı Ajanların ve Uygulama Yöntemlerinin Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2013, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 1 - 6, 01.10.2013

Çağatay Barutcigil Kubilay Barutcigil Duygu Kürklü Osman Tolga Harorlı

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversal bağlayıcı ajanların makaslama bağlanma dayanımını farklı adeziv stratejilerde değerlendirmek ve geleneksel bağlayıcı ajanlarla karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yetmiş adet çürüksüz insan üçüncü büyük azı dişleri seçildi ve adezive ve uygulanacak stratejiye göre 7 gruba ayrıldı; Single Bond Universal self-etch SBUSe ve etch-and-rinse SBUEr , All Bond Universal self-etch ABUSe ve etch-and-rinse ABUEr , Adper Single Bond 2 ASB , Clearfil SE Bond CSE ve Futurabond M FBM . Dişlerin üzerlerine restorasyonlar yapıldı ve 370C/24 saat distile su içerisinde bekletildi. Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testleri bir üniversal test cihazı yardımıyla 0.5 mm/dk. hızında gerçekleştirildi. Elde edilen verilerin analizleri tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Duncan testi ile yapıldı α=0.05 . Bulgular: SBU ve ABU adeziv sistemler için dentin yüzeyine fosforik asit uygulanması bağlanma dayanımı önemli derecede arttırmıştır. FBM dışındaki self-etch stratejiler arasında istatistiksel olarak bir fark bulunmadı. Tüm adeziv sistemler içersinde en düşük MPa değerleri FBM göstermiştir p

Keywords

Kayma mukavemeti, dentin bağlayıcı ajanlar

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Current Dentin Bonding Agentsand Strategies

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of universal adhesive under different strategies and to compare with the conventional bonding systems. Methods: Seventy sound human third molars selected and divided into 7 groups according to the adhesive and strategy: Single Bond Universal self-etch SBUSe and etch-and-rinse SBUEr , All Bond Universal self-etch ABUSe and etch-and-rinse ABUEr , Adper Single Bond 2 ASB , Clearfil SE Bond CSE and Futurabond M FBM . Build-ups were constructed and specimens were stored in distilled water 370C/24h . Shear bond strength test were performed with a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan test α=0.05 . Results: Prior to phosphoric acid etching significantly increased bond strength of the SBU and ABU. There was no statistically a difference between self-etch strategies SBUSe, ABUSe and CSE except FBM. FBM showed the lowest mean MPa in all adhesives p

Keywords

Shear bond strength, dentin bonding agents

References

• 1. Salerno M, Derchi G, Thorat S, Ceseracciu L, Ruffilli R, Barone AC. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2011;27(12):1221-8.
• 2. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998;26(1):1-20.
• 3. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84(2):118-32.
• 4. Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, Bauer JRO, Loquercio AD, Reis A. Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resindentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2006;22(12):1150-6.
• 5. Spencer P, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(7):501-7.
• 6. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, Dorfer C. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of moist vs dry bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):23- 30.
• 7. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000;79(6):1385-91.
• 8. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y, et al. Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(3):306-11.
• 9. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16.
• 10. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture - Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.
• 11. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90-101.
• 12. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):647-60.
• 13. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010;26(12):1176-84.
• 14. Perdigao J, Carmo ARP, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJD, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent. 2005;18(2):135-40.
• 15. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Intercrystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(6):464-70.
• 16. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, VanMeerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a selfetching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent. 1997;10(3):141-6.
• 17. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective Enamel Etching Reconsidered: Better than Etch-and-Rinse and Self-etch? J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(5):339-44.
• 18. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25(11):1459-67.
• 19. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475-84.
• 20. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent. 2012;25(3):153-8.
• 21. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41(5):404-11.
• 22. Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: A new concept. J Dent. 2009;37(8):604-9.
• 23. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled Nanolayering at the Adhesive Interface. J Dent Res. 2012;91(4):376-81.
• 24. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glassionomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):459-66.
• 25. Lin A, Mcintyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the Adhesion of Glass-Ionomer Cements to Dentin. J Dent Res. 1992;71(11):1836-41.
• 26. Kenshima S, Reis A, Uceda-Gomez N, Tancredo LLF, Filho LER, Nogueira FN, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):117- 26.
• 27. Proenga JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Carolina M, Erhardt G, Aguilera FS, et al. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2007;23(12):1542-8.
• 28. Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A New Universal Simplified Adhesive: 6-Month Clinical Evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(1):55-69.
• 29. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent. 2006;34(1):77-85.
• 30. Rotta M, Bresciani P, Moura SK, Grande RHM, Hilgert LA, Baratieri LN, et al. Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of selfetching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(6):537-45.