Self-Etching Adesiv Sistemlerin Anti-Bakteriyel Özellikleri

Year 2014, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 16 - 20, 01.04.2014

Fırat Öztürk Muhammet Yalçın Uğur Arslan Mustafa Ersöz

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Direk Kontakt Testi DKT kullanılarak Self Etching Adeziv sistemlerinin antibakteriyel etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. DKT için, 96 adet mikrotitre plaklar n=8 , Self Etching Adesiv sistemler Clearfil SE Protect, Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer ve Transbond XT adesiv sistemlerle kaplandı. Kontrol materyali olarak Kalzinol çinko oksit ojenol kullanıldı. Streptococcus mutans süspansiyonu örneklerin yüzey alanına uygulanarak 37 oC de bir saat bekletildi. Bakteri üremesi, ısı kontrollü spektrofotometre ile 16 saat boyunca gözlendi. Her bir kuyucuktaki üremenin kinetiği her 30 dakika da bir 650 nm düzeyinde sürekli olarak kaydedildi.Verilerin, one-way ANOVA testi ile analizi yapılmıştır p

Keywords

Direk Kontakt Testi (DKT), Self Etching Adesiv Sistemler, Antibakteriyel Özellik

Antibacterial Properties of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of self-etching adhesive systems using a direct contact test DCT . For the DCT, wells n=8 of 96-microtitre plates were coated with the self-etching adhesive systems Clearfil SE Protect, Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer and Transbond XT adhesive, and with control material Kalzinol . A Streptococcus mutans suspension was placed on the surface of each specimen for 1 hour at 37C. Bacterial growth was monitored for 16 hours with a temperature-controlled microplate spectrophotometer. The kinetics of the outgrowth in each well were continuously recorded at 650 nm every 30 minutes. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA p< 0.05 . The results of the DCT showed that Clearfil SE Protect and Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer exhibited potent antibacterial activity. Within the limitations of this study, Clearfil SE Protect and Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer showed antibacterial properties

Keywords

The Direct Contact Test (DCT), Self-Etching Adesiv Systems, Antibacterial Properties.

References

• Chatterjee R, Kleinberg I 1979 Effect of orthodontic band placement on the chemical composition of human incisor tooth plaque. Arch Oral Biol 24: 97-100.
• Scheie A, Arneberg P, Krogstad O 1984 Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res 92: 211- 7.
• Blunden R, Oliver R, O’Kane C 1994 Microbial growth on the surfaces of various orthodontic bonding cements. Br J Orthod 21: 125-32.
• Fournier A, Payart L, Bouclin R 1998 Adherence of streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114; 414-7.
• Matasa C G 1995 Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108: 132- 41.
• Loesche W J 1979 Clinical and microbiological aspects of chemotherapeutic agents used according to the specific plaque hypothesis. Journal of Dental Research 58: 2404-12. 7. O’Reilly
• M M, Featherstone J D B 1987 Demineralization
• orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod
• Dentofacial Orthop 92: 33-40. around
• Benson P E, Parkin N, Millett D T, Dyer F E, Vine S, Shah A 2004 Fluorides for the prevention of white spots on teeth during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD003809.
• Geiger A M, Gorelick L, Gwinnett A J, Griswold P G 1988 The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93: 29-37.
• Paschos E, Kleinschrodt T, Clementino-Luedemann T, Huth K C, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K H, Rudzki-Janson I 2009 Effect of different bonding agents on prevention of brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135: 603-12. around orthodontic
• Eminkahyagil N, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S, Baseren M 2005 Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with newly developed antibacterial self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthodontists 75: 843-8.
• Sirirungrojying S, Saito K, Hayakawa T, Kasai K 2004 Efficacy of using self-etching primer with a 4- META/MMA-TBB orthodontic brackets to human enamel and effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength. Angle Orthodontists 74: 251-8. cement in bonding
• Ebi N, Imazato S, Noiri Y, Ebisu S 2001 Inhibitory effects of resin composite containing bactericide- immobilized filler on plaque accumulation. Dent Mater 17: 485–91.
• Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell R R B 2003 Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized restoratives. Biomater 24: 3605-9. filler for resin-based
• Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell R R B, Kaneko T, Ebisu S 1999 Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomater 20: 899-903.
• Kawashima M, Nakatsuka K, Okada K, Yamauchi J 2002 Characteristics of a new antibacterial and fluoride releasing bonding system. J Dent Res 81: A–241.
• Weiss E I, Shalhav M, Fuss Z 1996 Assessment of antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by a direct contact test. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology 12: 179-84.
• Lewinstein I, Matalon S, Slutzkey S, Weiss EI 2005 Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests. J Prosthet Dent 93: 364-71.
• Matalon S, Slutzky H, Mazor Y, Weiss EI 2003 Surface antibacterial properties of fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 25: 43-8.
• Chin M Y, Sandham A, Rumachik E N, Ruben J L, Huysmans M C 2009 Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136: 547-53.
• McNeill C J, Wiltshire W A, Dawes C, Lavelle C L 2001 Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120: 392-7.
• Artun J, Brobakken B O 1986 Prevalence of carious white multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 8: 229-34. treatment with
• Gorelick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J 1982 Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 81: 93–8.
• Wenderoth C J, Weinstein M, Borislow A I 1999 Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing sealant in reducing decalcification during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116: 629-34.
• Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J 1988 Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94: 68- 73.
• Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D 2009 Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 3: 127-34.
• Derks A, Katsaros C, Frencken J E, van’t Hof M A, Kuipers-Jagtman A M 2004 Caries-inhibiting effect of preventive measure during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Caries Resh 38: 413–20
• Korbmacher H M, Huck L, Adam T, Kahl-Nieke B 2006a Evaluation of an antimicrobial and fluoride- releasing self-etching primer on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod 28: 457-61.
• Tobias R S 1988 Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int Endod J 21: 155-60.
• Eli I, Cooper Y, Ben-Amar A, Weiss E 1995 Antibacterial activity of three dental liners. J Prosthodont 4: 178-82.
• Herrera M, Carrion P, Baca P, Liebana J, Castillo A 2001 In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements. Microbios 104: 141-8.
• Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P, Carrion P 1999 Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent 24: 286-91.
• Kocak MM, Ozcan S, Kocak S, Topuz O, Erten H 2009 Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 3: 57-61.
• Meryon S D, Johnson S G 1989 The modified model cavity method for assessing antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 68: 835-9.
• Herrera M, Castillo A, Bravo M, Liebana J, Carrion P 2000 Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer, and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples. Oper Dent 25: 265-9.
• Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI 2005 Antibacterial properties of 4 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127: 56-63.
• Duran I, Sengun A, Hadimli H H, Ulker M 2008 Evaluation Desensitizers against Oral Bacteria. Eur J Dent 2: 43-7.
• da Silva R C, Zuanon A C, Spolidorio D M, Campos J A 2007 Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18: 1859-62.
• Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Takahashi Y, Ebisu S, Peters M C 2006 In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent Mater 22: 527-32.
• Korbmacher HM, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B 2006 Fluoride-releasing adhesive and antimicrobial self- etching primer effects on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontists 76: 845-50.
• Bishara S E, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ 2005 Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 75: 397-9.
• Arhun N, Arman A, Sesen C, Karabulut E, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S 2006 Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with 3 self-etch adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129: 547- 50.
• Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini M F, Tagliani P, Klersy C 2007 In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132: 656-62.