Uygulamalı Antropolojinin Gelişimine Genel Bir Bakış

Year 2013, Issue: 25, 65 - 87, 15.06.2013

Urungu Akgül

https://doi.org/10.1501/antro_0000000030

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Uygulamalı Antropolojinin gelişimi, sistematiğinin, uzmanlarının, meslek örgütleri ve kurumlarının neredeyse tamamıyla birlikte Birleşik Devletler ve Birleşik Krallığın koloni coğrafyasında gerçekleşmiştir. Başlangıçtaki işlevleri yalnızca kültürel bilgi toplayıcısı olarak tanımlanan sosyal antropologlar 20. Yüzyılın ikinci yarısından sonra karar vericiler ve politika oluşturucular olarak çalışmaya başlamışlardır. Günümüzde ise sosyal antropologların birincil önceliği birlikte çalıştıkları dezavantajlı ve yerli grupların haklarını korumaktır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak, ulusal antropoloji birliklerince etik bildirgeleri yayımlanmıştır

Keywords

Uygulamalı antropoloji, antropoloji tarihi, antropoloji etiği

A General View to the History of Applied Anthropology

Abstract

The development of applied anthropology took place with its systematic, experts, associations and institutions in United States and in the colonial territories of United Kingdom. Social anthropologists, whose primordial functions defined as cultural data collectors, after the second half of twentieth century have started to work as decision and policy makers. Today, the first priority of social anthropologists is to save the rights of the local and indigenous groups, which they work together. For this purpose, ethic declarations have been published by national anthropology associations

Keywords

Applied Anthropology, history of anthropology, anthropological ethics

References

• Clark, B.ve van Willigen, J. (1981) “Documentation and Data Management in Applied Antropology”, Journal of Cultural and Educational Futures 2(2-3) s:23-27,
• CLIFTON, J. A. (1970) Applied Anthropology: Readings in The Uses of The Science of Man, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
• COLLİER, J. (1936) Instruction to Field Workers, Washington D.C: Applied Anthropology Unit
• FOSTER, G. (1969) Applied Anthropology, Boston: Brown
• GOLDSCHMİDT, W. C. (1947 ) As You Sow: Three Studies in the Social Conseuences of Agribusiness, Glencoe III: The Free Press,
• HINSLEY, C. M Jr. (1976) “Amateurs and Professionals in Washington Anthropology, 1879 to 1903”, American Anthropology
• HONİGMANN, J. (1976) The Development of Anthropological Ideas, Dorsay,
• KEITH, A. (1917) “How Can the Institut Best Serve the Needs of Anthropology”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society, 47, 12-30,
• KENNARD, E. A. ve Mac GREGOR, G. (1953) “Applied Anthropology in Government: United States”, Anthropology Today, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
• KİMBALL, S. T. ve PROVİNSE, J. H. (1942) “Navaho Social Organization in Land Use Planning”, Applied Anthropology 1:(4), 18-25
• MEKEEL, H. S. (1944) “An Appraisal of the Indian Reorganisation Act”, American Anthropologists, 46(2), 209-217
• POWELL, J. W. (1881) First Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington D.C: Government Printing Office
• REINING, C. C. (1962) “A Lost Period of Applied Anthropology”, American Anthropologists 64, 593-600,
• RODNİCK, D. (1936) “Report on the Indian of Kansas”, Applied Anthropology Unit Report Series, Washington D.C
• SACHCHİDANANDA. (1972) “Planning, Development and Applied Anthropology”, Jornal of the Indian Anthropological Society 7, 11-28,
• van WİLLİGEN, J. (1986) Applied Anthropology, Massachusetts:Bergin & Garvey