Suchey-Brooks yaş tahmini yönteminin Türk popülasyonunda 3 boyutlu pubis simfisiz görüntüleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi

Year 2020, Issue: 40, 69 - 76, 30.12.2020

Öznur Gülhan

https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.811411

Abstract

Yaş tahmini, özellikle adlî antropologlar için biyolojik profil oluşturma sürecinde oldukça kritik ve zaman zaman tanımlanması zor bir süreçtir. Yetişkin iskelet kalıntılarındaki çeşitli morfolojik özellikler gözlemlenerek yaş tahmini için belirli standartlar oluşturulmasında kullanılabilmektedir. Bu iskelet elementlerinin en başında pubis simfisiz gelmektedir. Günümüzde pubis simfisizden yaş tahmini için en yaygın olarak kullanılan yöntem, 6 fazlı bir sistem olan Suchey-Brooks yöntemidir. Bu yöntem çok sayıda osteolojik koleksiyon veya sanal örnek üzerinde geniş çapta test edilmiş ve bu yaş tahmini yönteminin genellikle popülasyon varyasyonlarından etkilendiği belirtilmiştir. Bu sebeple bu çalışmada BT görüntülerinden elde edilen modern Türk popülasyonuna ait pubis simfisiz modelleri üzerinde Suchey-Brooks yönteminin güvenilirliği test edilmiştir. Suchey-Brooks yöntemi kullanılarak yaş tahmini yapmak için modern Türk popülasyonuna ait 120 bireyin (60 Kadın, 60 Erkek) bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerinden elde edilen üç boyutlu rekonstrüksiyonları araştırmada kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, Suchey-Brooks yöntemi için hem yanlılık hem de yanlışlık düzeylerinin yaşla birlikte arttığını ve yaş ilerledikçe gerçek yaşın daha küçük tahmin edilme eğiliminde olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, yetişkin bireylerin yaşını tahmin etmeye yönelik kullanılan yöntemlerin, yöntemin geliştirildiği örneklem ile uygulandığı çalışma arasındaki yer ve zaman farklılıklarını en aza indirmek için farklı popülasyonlarda test edilmesi gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Suckey-Brooks Yöntemi, yaş tahmini, pubis simfisiz, bilgisayarlı tomografi, adlî antropoloji

Evaluation of Suchey-Brooks age estimation method using 3 dimensional pubic symphysis images in Turkish population

Abstract

Age estimation has a critical and difficult part in the biological profiling process for forensic anthropologists. Various morphological features in adult skeletal remains can be observed and be used by establishing certain standards for age estimation. Pubic shymphysis comes first among these skeletal elements. Today, the most widely used method for age estimation from pubic shymphysis is the Suchey-Brooks method. This method has been extensively tested on numerous osteological collections or virtual specimens, and it has often been stated that the age estimation method is influenced by population variations. For this reason, the reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method was tested on the pubic shymphysis models of modern Turkish population obtained from CT images. Three-dimensional reconstructions obtained from computed tomography images of 120 individuals (60 female, 60 male) belonging to the modern Turkish population were used in the study to estimate age using the Suchey-Brooks method. The results of the study show that the levels of both bias and inaccuracy increase with age for the Suchey-Brooks method, and the real age tends to be estimated smaller as the age gets older. As a result, the methods used to estimate the age of adult individuals should be tested in different populations to minimize the time and place differences between the sample in which the method was developed and the study it was applied to.

Keywords

Suchey-Brooks method, age estimation, pubic symphysis, computed tomography, forensic anthropology

References

• Baccino, E., ve Schmitt, A. (2006). Determination of adult age at death in the forensic context. A. Schmitt, E. Cunha ve J. Pinheiro (ed.) içinde, Forensic anthropology and medicine: Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death (s. 259-280). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_11
• Black, S., ve Ferguson, E. (2011). Forensic anthropology: 2000 to 2010. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10727
• Brooks, S. T. (1955). Skeletal age at death: The reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 13(4), 567-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330130403
• Brooks, S., ve Suchey, J. M. (1990). Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Human Evolution, 5(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437238
• Dedouit, F., Telmon, N., Hervé, R., Francis, E., Joffre, C., ve Daniel, R. (2010). Modern cross-sectional imaging in anthropology. M. J. Thali, M. D. Viner ve B. G. Brogdon (ed.) içinde, Brogdon’s Forensic Radiology (2nd edition) (s. 107-126). CRC Press.
• Gülhan, Ö. (2020a). Tibia kemiğine ait metrik ölçümlerde bilateral asimetrinin değerlendirilmesi. Antropoloji, (39), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.723090
• Gülhan, Ö. (2020b). Üç farklı görüntüleme tekniğinden alınan tibia ölçümlerinin güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 60(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2020.60.1.7
• Hartnett, K. M. (2010). Analysis of age-at-death estimation using data from a new, modern autopsy sample - Part I: Pubic bone. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 55(5), 1145-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01399.x
• Joubert, L. C., Briers, N., ve Meyer, A. (2019). Evaluation of the Suchey–Brooks age estimation method in a white South African population. Forensic Science International, 301, e14-e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.029
• Katz, D., ve Suchey, J. M. (1986). Age determination of the male os pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 69(4), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330690402
• Kimmerle, E. H., Jantz, R. L., Konigsberg, L. W., ve Baraybar, J. P. (2008). Skeletal Estimation and Identification in American and East European Populations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(3), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00708.x
• Konigsberg, L. W., ve Frankenberg, S. R. (1994). Paleodemography: “Not quite dead.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 3(3), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1360030306
• Koo, T. K., ve Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
• Kotěrová, A., Velemínská, J., Cunha, E., ve Brůžek, J. (2019). A validation study of the Stoyanova et al. method (2017) for age-at-death estimation quantifying the 3D pubic symphyseal surface of adult males of European populations. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 133(2), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1934-1
• Langley, N. R., Gooding, A. F., ve Tersigni-Tarrant, M. A. (2017). Age Estimation Methods. N. R. Langley ve M. Tersigni-Tarrant (ed.) içinde, Forensic Anthropology: A comprehensive introduction, Second Edition (s. 193-212). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315300030
• Lottering, N., MacGregor, D. M., Meredith, M., Alston, C. L., ve Gregory, L. S. (2013). Evaluation of the Suchey-Brooks method of age estimation in an Australian subpopulation using computed tomography of the pubic symphyseal surface. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 150(3), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22213
• Márquez-Grant, N. (2015). An overview of age estimation in forensic anthropology: Perspectives and practical considerations. Annals of Human Biology, 42(4), 306-320. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1048288
• Mckern, T. W. ve Stewart, T. D. (1957). Skeletal age changes in young American males: Analysed from the standpoint of age identification. Natick, MA: Quartermaster Research and Development Command Technical Report EP-45.
• Miranker, M. (2016). A comparison of different age estimation methods of the adult pelvis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61(5), 1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13130
• Pucciarelli, V., Gibelli, D. M., Codari, M., Maria, F., Rusconi, E., Cappella, A., ve Sforza, C. (2016). Laser scanner versus stereophotogrammetry: A three-dimensional quantitative approach for morphological analysis of pubic symphysis. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies içinde, (s. 80-87). https://doi.org/10.15221/16.080
• Rissech, C., Wilson, J., Winburn, A. P., Turbón, D., ve Steadman, D. (2012). A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 126(1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0586-1
• Sakaue, K. (2006). Application of the Suchey-Brooks system of pubic age estimation to recent Japanese skeletal material. Anthropological Science, 114(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.00098
• San Millán, M., Rissech, C., ve Turbón, D. (2013). A test of Suchey-Brooks (pubic symphysis) and Buckberry-Chamberlain (auricular surface) methods on an identified Spanish sample: Paleodemographic implications. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(4), 1743-1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.021
• Savall, F., Rérolle, C., Hérin, F., Dédouit, F., Rougé, D., Telmon, N., ve Saint-Martin, P. (2016). Reliability of the Suchey-Brooks method for a French contemporary population. Forensic Science International, 266, 586.e1-586.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.030
• Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology [SWGANTH] (2013). Age estimation (Revision 1). https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2018/03/13/swganth_age_estimation.pdf
• Steyn, M., Becker, P. J., L’Abbe, E. N., Scholtz, Y., ve Myburg, J. (2012). An assessment of the repeatability of pubic and ischial measurements. Forensic Science International, 214(1-3),e1-210.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.049
• Tersigni-Tarrant, M. A., ve Shirley, N. R. (2013). Forensic anthropology: an introduction. CRC Press.
• Todd, T. W. (1920). Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The male white pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 3(3), 285-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330030301
• Ubelaker, D. H. (2008). Methodology in commingling analysis: An historical overview. B. J. Adams ve J. E. Byrd (ed.) içinde, Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains (s. 1-6). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-316-5_1