Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures

Volume: 23 Number: 3 September 11, 2006
  • Emin Alici
  • Erdogan Kutluay
EN TR

Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures

Abstract

25 fresh cedaver tibias were used for biomechanical testing of different internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. 45 degree oblique fractures were created in the middle 1/3 of the diaphyses. 1O tibias were tested for intramedullary Ender nailing, 8 for intramedullary Kuntscher nailing, 7 for plate-screw fixation. Test specimens were subjected to axial compression, lateral bending and torsional forces. Plate osteosynthesis was found to be the most resistant to compression forces and Kuntscher and Ender nailing followed. As for bending, Kuntscher nailing was the most reliable and then came plate fixation and Ender nailing. For torsional stresses, the order was plate osteosynthesis, Ender and Kuntscher nailing. Ender nails were elastic and the deformation disappeared as the forces were removed. This was an advantage for Ender nails.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Emin Alici This is me

Erdogan Kutluay This is me

Publication Date

September 11, 2006

Submission Date

March 6, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1989 Volume: 23 Number: 3

APA
Alici, E., & Kutluay, E. (2006). Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 23(3), 134-136. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062
AMA
1.Alici E, Kutluay E. Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;23(3):134-136. doi:10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062
Chicago
Alici, Emin, and Erdogan Kutluay. 2006. “Biomechanical Features of Internal Fixation Methods in Tibial Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 23 (3): 134-36. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062.
EndNote
Alici E, Kutluay E (September 1, 2006) Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 23 3 134–136.
IEEE
[1]E. Alici and E. Kutluay, “Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 134–136, Sept. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062.
ISNAD
Alici, Emin - Kutluay, Erdogan. “Biomechanical Features of Internal Fixation Methods in Tibial Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 23/3 (September 1, 2006): 134-136. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062.
JAMA
1.Alici E, Kutluay E. Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;23:134–136.
MLA
Alici, Emin, and Erdogan Kutluay. “Biomechanical Features of Internal Fixation Methods in Tibial Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 23, no. 3, Sept. 2006, pp. 134-6, doi:10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062.
Vancouver
1.Emin Alici, Erdogan Kutluay. Biomechanical features of internal fixation methods in tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006 Sep. 1;23(3):134-6. doi:10.3944/aott.v23i3.1062