The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects

Volume: 30 Number: 3 September 11, 2006
  • Mustafa Herdem
  • Canan Ersoz
  • Yaman Sarpel
  • Emre Togrul
  • Mahir Gulsen
TR EN

The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects

Abstract

In order to obtain union and lengthening in the tibial defects of adult rabbits; comparison-distraction and bone transport methods were performed by using external fixator. Clinical, histological and radiological evaluation of the results were done. Sufficient union was observed in all rabbits treated with compression-distraction method. While the union in the proximal site of the defect in rabbits treated with transport method was sufficient, the union in the distal site was not sufficient.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mustafa Herdem This is me

Canan Ersoz This is me

Yaman Sarpel This is me

Emre Togrul This is me

Mahir Gulsen This is me

Publication Date

September 11, 2006

Submission Date

March 6, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1996 Volume: 30 Number: 3

APA
Herdem, M., Ersoz, C., Sarpel, Y., Togrul, E., & Gulsen, M. (2006). The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 30(3), 317-320. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002
AMA
1.Herdem M, Ersoz C, Sarpel Y, Togrul E, Gulsen M. The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;30(3):317-320. doi:10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002
Chicago
Herdem, Mustafa, Canan Ersoz, Yaman Sarpel, Emre Togrul, and Mahir Gulsen. 2006. “The Comparison of Compression-Distraction and Bone Transport Methods in the Treatment of Acute Bone Defects”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30 (3): 317-20. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002.
EndNote
Herdem M, Ersoz C, Sarpel Y, Togrul E, Gulsen M (September 1, 2006) The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30 3 317–320.
IEEE
[1]M. Herdem, C. Ersoz, Y. Sarpel, E. Togrul, and M. Gulsen, “The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 317–320, Sept. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002.
ISNAD
Herdem, Mustafa - Ersoz, Canan - Sarpel, Yaman - Togrul, Emre - Gulsen, Mahir. “The Comparison of Compression-Distraction and Bone Transport Methods in the Treatment of Acute Bone Defects”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30/3 (September 1, 2006): 317-320. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002.
JAMA
1.Herdem M, Ersoz C, Sarpel Y, Togrul E, Gulsen M. The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;30:317–320.
MLA
Herdem, Mustafa, et al. “The Comparison of Compression-Distraction and Bone Transport Methods in the Treatment of Acute Bone Defects”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 30, no. 3, Sept. 2006, pp. 317-20, doi:10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Herdem, Canan Ersoz, Yaman Sarpel, Emre Togrul, Mahir Gulsen. The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006 Sep. 1;30(3):317-20. doi:10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002