Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors

Volume: 33 Number: 4 September 11, 2006
  • I. Benli
  • Mehmet Citak
  • Serdar Akalin
  • Mahmut Kis
  • Evrim Duman
  • Sema Hucumenoglu
EN TR

Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors

Abstract

The objective of surgical treatment in painful and disabling spinal tumors is the pathological identification of the tumour, neurological decompression, establishment of spinal stability and maintenance of a comfortable life span. Eleven benign (BPST) and 14 malignant primary spinal tumour (MPST) cases were assessed according to their clinical, radiological and surgical outcome in this study. The average age of BPST and MPST cases were 47.7 (7-66) years and 50.4 (13-65) years, respectively. Computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) was obtained for radiological assessment. Together with Enneking classification, Weinstein - Boriani - Bigiani (WBB) surgical staging was used for surgical planning. Benign tomours were most commonly located in L1 vertebra. The average of affected vertebra was 1.2 ± 0.4 and the most common BPST types were eosinophilic granuloma (3 patients), aneurysmal bone cyst (3 patients) and hemangioma (3 patients). Following en - block resection, neurological findings of 6 patients with BPST recovered 100 %. Anterior approach, autologous strut grafting and anterior instrumentation was carried out in 8 patients, while posterior approach, autologous fusion and instrumentation was preferred in 3 patients. The involvement of mobile segments in the fusion area was 3 in the cervical, 2.6 in the thoracal, and 2 in the lumbar region. Sagittal contours improved significantly by this method. Total pain relief was observed in 6 patients while pain decreased significantly in the remaining 5 BPST patients. In 14 MPST patients, the average of involved vertebra was 1.8 ± 0.8, all patients were Enneking stage II B and the involvement according to WBB was between 4 and 9. All patients underwent anterior vertebrectomy. 10 had anterior fusion and autologous strut grafting, while posterior autologous fusion and instrumentation at the same session was the method of treatment in the remaining 4 patients. An average of 3.2 ± 1.6 mobile segments were included in the instrumentation and fusion mass in these cases. 73 % improvement in the sagittal index was obtained by this method. Eight of the MPST patients had preoperative neurological deficits. The rate of total recovery following surgery was 75 % and improvement in neurological status was observed in 25 %. The most common type of lesion was multiple myeloma (42.8 %) followed by plasmocytoma (14.3 %), hystiocytoma (14.3 %), osteosarcoma (14.3 %) and lymphoma (14.3 %). The preoperative pain - functional assesment (PFA) score decreased from 16.7 to 10.0 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, en - block tumour excision, anterior strut grafting and / or anterior or posterior instrumentation in the same session is effective in the maintenance of spinal stability, relief of pain, recovery of neurological symptoms and improvement of functional capacity.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

I. Benli This is me

Mehmet Citak This is me

Serdar Akalin This is me

Mahmut Kis This is me

Evrim Duman This is me

Sema Hucumenoglu This is me

Publication Date

September 11, 2006

Submission Date

March 6, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1999 Volume: 33 Number: 4

APA
Benli, I., Citak, M., Akalin, S., Kis, M., Duman, E., & Hucumenoglu, S. (2006). Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 33(4), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354
AMA
1.Benli I, Citak M, Akalin S, Kis M, Duman E, Hucumenoglu S. Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;33(4):264-279. doi:10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354
Chicago
Benli, I., Mehmet Citak, Serdar Akalin, Mahmut Kis, Evrim Duman, and Sema Hucumenoglu. 2006. “Surgical Outcome of Spinal Tumors. I. Primary Benign and Malignant Spinal Tumors”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 33 (4): 264-79. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354.
EndNote
Benli I, Citak M, Akalin S, Kis M, Duman E, Hucumenoglu S (September 1, 2006) Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 33 4 264–279.
IEEE
[1]I. Benli, M. Citak, S. Akalin, M. Kis, E. Duman, and S. Hucumenoglu, “Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 264–279, Sept. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354.
ISNAD
Benli, I. - Citak, Mehmet - Akalin, Serdar - Kis, Mahmut - Duman, Evrim - Hucumenoglu, Sema. “Surgical Outcome of Spinal Tumors. I. Primary Benign and Malignant Spinal Tumors”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 33/4 (September 1, 2006): 264-279. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354.
JAMA
1.Benli I, Citak M, Akalin S, Kis M, Duman E, Hucumenoglu S. Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;33:264–279.
MLA
Benli, I., et al. “Surgical Outcome of Spinal Tumors. I. Primary Benign and Malignant Spinal Tumors”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 33, no. 4, Sept. 2006, pp. 264-79, doi:10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354.
Vancouver
1.I. Benli, Mehmet Citak, Serdar Akalin, Mahmut Kis, Evrim Duman, Sema Hucumenoglu. Surgical outcome of spinal tumors. I. Primary benign and malignant spinal tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006 Sep. 1;33(4):264-79. doi:10.3944/aott.v33i4.2354