BibTex RIS Cite

Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty

Year 2003, Volume: 37 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 11.09.2006
https://izlik.org/JA37AR57HN

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the results of non-cemented revision arthroplasty in patients who had undergone cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Methods: Twenty patients (12 women, 8 men; mean age 72 years; range 61 to 84 years) underwent non-cemented revision arthroplasty after a mean of 9.4 years (range 3 to 16 years) following primary surgery. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 years (range 3 months to 6.3 years).
Results: During revision arthroplasty, femur fractures were observed in three patients (15%). Three patients (15%) had femoral cortex perforations. Trochanteric osteotomy was performed in five patients (25%). The mean Harris hip score after the operation was 76.7 (range 50 to 90). The results were excellent in three patients (15%), good in seven (35%), fair in seven (35%), and poor in three patients (15%).
Conclusion: Despite a high intraoperative complication rate during non-cemented revision total hip arthroplasty, we believe that non-cemented revision should be the preferred method because of low infection and low aseptic loosening rates.

Çimentosuz total kalça revizyon artroplastisinde klinik deneyimlerimiz

Year 2003, Volume: 37 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 11.09.2006
https://izlik.org/JA37AR57HN

Abstract

Amaç: Çimentolu total kalça artroplastisi yapılan olgularda uyguladığımız çimentosuz revizyon artroplastisi sonuçlarını değerlendirdik.
Çalışma planı: Yirmi olguda (12 kadın, 8 erkek; ort. yaş 72; dağılım 61-84) çimentosuz total kalça revizyonu uygulandı. Primer protez uygulamasından sonra geçen ortalama süre 9.4 yıl (dağılım 3-16 yıl), ortalama izlem süresi 4.5 yıl (dağılım 3 ay-6.3 yıl) idi.
Sonuçlar: Revizyon artroplastisi sırasında üç olguda (%15) femoral kırık, üç olguda (%15) femoral korteks perforasyonu görüldü. Beş olguda (%25) trokanterik osteotomi yapıldı. Ameliyat sonrası Harris kalça skoru ortalaması 76.7 (dağılım 50-90) bulundu. Sonuçlar üç olguda (%15) mükemmel, yedi olguda (%35) iyi, yedi olguda (%35) orta, üç olguda (%15) kötü idi.
Çıkarımlar: Çimentosuz total kalça revizyon artroplastileri sırasında, önemli oranda ameliyat içi komplikasyon oluşmaktadır. Buna karşın, enfeksiyon oranlarının düşük olması ve aseptik gevşemenin daha az görülmesi nedeniyle, çimentosuz revizyonların tercih edilmesi gerektiğini düşünüyoruz.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

İbrahim Yanmis This is me

Servet Tunay This is me

Cemil Yildiz This is me

Can Solakoglu This is me

Ethem Gur This is me

Publication Date September 11, 2006
DOI https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v37i1.847
IZ https://izlik.org/JA37AR57HN
Published in Issue Year 2003 Volume: 37 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yanmis, İ., Tunay, S., Yildiz, C., Solakoglu, C., & Gur, E. (2006). Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 37(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v37i1.847
AMA 1.Yanmis İ, Tunay S, Yildiz C, Solakoglu C, Gur E. Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;37(1):1-8. doi:10.3944/aott.v37i1.847
Chicago Yanmis, İbrahim, Servet Tunay, Cemil Yildiz, Can Solakoglu, and Ethem Gur. 2006. “Our Clinical Experience With Non-Cemented Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 37 (1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v37i1.847.
EndNote Yanmis İ, Tunay S, Yildiz C, Solakoglu C, Gur E (September 1, 2006) Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 37 1 1–8.
IEEE [1]İ. Yanmis, S. Tunay, C. Yildiz, C. Solakoglu, and E. Gur, “Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Sept. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v37i1.847.
ISNAD Yanmis, İbrahim - Tunay, Servet - Yildiz, Cemil - Solakoglu, Can - Gur, Ethem. “Our Clinical Experience With Non-Cemented Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 37/1 (September 1, 2006): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v37i1.847.
JAMA 1.Yanmis İ, Tunay S, Yildiz C, Solakoglu C, Gur E. Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;37:1–8.
MLA Yanmis, İbrahim, et al. “Our Clinical Experience With Non-Cemented Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 37, no. 1, Sept. 2006, pp. 1-8, doi:10.3944/aott.v37i1.847.
Vancouver 1.Yanmis İ, Tunay S, Yildiz C, Solakoglu C, Gur E. Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica [Internet]. 2006 Sept. 1;37(1):1-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA37AR57HN