Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing

Year 2010, Volume: 44 Issue: 4, 322 - 327, 29.12.2010
https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing.
Methods: Twenty-five full-grown male rabbits were included in the study; all 25 had bone blocks resected and reimplanted. In group 1, bone blocks were autoclaved; in group 2, bone blocks were pasteurized; and in group 3 (controls), resected bone blocks were reimplanted without sterilization.
Results: Heiple scores of the proximal parts of the fusion surfaces in group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 12.8±0.4, 6.8±1.2, and 10.2±1.9, respectively. Heiple scores of the distal parts of the fusion surfaces in group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 10.8±0.8, 6.0±1.1, and 9.8±1.5, respectively. Differences in radiologic scores were not statistically significant between the groups for proximal or distal fusion surfaces at 3 and 6 weeks.
Conclusion: In conclusion, pasteurization has a less negative effect on bone healing than autoclaving, and can be considered for bone sterilization in certain circumstances.  

Year 2010, Volume: 44 Issue: 4, 322 - 327, 29.12.2010
https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Recep Vural This is me

Burak Akesen This is me

Mehmet Karakayali This is me

Ulviye Yalçinkaya This is me

Ufuk Aydinli This is me

Publication Date December 29, 2010
IZ https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 44 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Vural, R., Akesen, B., Karakayali, M., Yalçinkaya, U., & Aydinli, U. (2010). The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 44(4), 322-327. https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR
AMA 1.Vural R, Akesen B, Karakayali M, Yalçinkaya U, Aydinli U. The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2010;44(4):322-327. https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR
Chicago Vural, Recep, Burak Akesen, Mehmet Karakayali, Ulviye Yalçinkaya, and Ufuk Aydinli. 2010. “The Comparison of the Negative Effect of Autoclaving and Pasteurization on Bone Healing”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 44 (4): 322-27. https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR.
EndNote Vural R, Akesen B, Karakayali M, Yalçinkaya U, Aydinli U (December 1, 2010) The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 44 4 322–327.
IEEE [1]R. Vural, B. Akesen, M. Karakayali, U. Yalçinkaya, and U. Aydinli, “The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 322–327, Dec. 2010, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR
ISNAD Vural, Recep - Akesen, Burak - Karakayali, Mehmet - Yalçinkaya, Ulviye - Aydinli, Ufuk. “The Comparison of the Negative Effect of Autoclaving and Pasteurization on Bone Healing”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 44/4 (December 1, 2010): 322-327. https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR.
JAMA 1.Vural R, Akesen B, Karakayali M, Yalçinkaya U, Aydinli U. The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2010;44:322–327.
MLA Vural, Recep, et al. “The Comparison of the Negative Effect of Autoclaving and Pasteurization on Bone Healing”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 44, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 322-7, https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR.
Vancouver 1.Vural R, Akesen B, Karakayali M, Yalçinkaya U, Aydinli U. The comparison of the negative effect of autoclaving and pasteurization on bone healing. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica [Internet]. 2010 Dec. 1;44(4):322-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA52TC53KR