2003-2012 yılları arasında Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica’da yayımlanan makaleler: İçerik, yapısal özellikler ve yayımlanma eğilimleri

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 2003-2012 yılları arasında Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica’da (AOTT) yayımlanan makaleleri bibliyometrik yöntemlerle inceleyerek makalelerin yayımlanma eğilimlerini, yapısal özelliklerini ve paternlerini belirlemekti.

Çalışma planı: 2003-2012 yılları arasında AOTT’de yayımlanmış tüm makaleler belirlendi ve çalışma tasarımlarına ve ortopedi alt dallarına göre sınıflandı. Her makale için ayrıca şu parametreler belirlendi: (1) yazar sayısı, (2) yazarların çalıştıkları kurum sayısı, (3) birinci yazarın çalıştığı kurumun yapısı, (4) birinci yazarın ülkesi, (5) örneklem büyüklüğü, (6) çalışmanın sonucu, (7) istatistiksel yöntemlerin kullanılıp kullanılmaması, (8) finansal destek alınıp alınmadığı ve (9) başvuru ile kabul edilme arasında geçen süre.

Bulgular: Toplam 699 uygun makale belirlendi. En çok görülen çalışma tasarımları geriye dönük gözlemsel çalışmalar ve olgu sunumlarıydı. En çok görülen ortopedi alt dalları ise ortopedik travma ile el ve mikrocerrahi olarak belirlendi. Birinci yazarın çalıştığı kurumun yapısı çalışmaların %56.4’ünde üniversite hastanesi, birinci yazarın ülkesi çalışmaların %93.4’ünde Türkiye idi. Başvuru ile kabul edilme arasında geçen süre ortalama 7.11 ay olarak saptandı.

Çıkarımlar: Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin önde gelen ortopedi dergisi AOTT’de 10 yıllık bir süre içinde yayımlanmış olan makalelerin güncel durumunu ve eğilimlerini ortaya koymuştur. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica’nın etki katsayısı değerleri yavaş ama istikrarlı bir artış eğilimi göstermekte, bu da dergiye olan artan ilgiyi yansıtmaktadır.

Keywords

• Bibliyometrik analiz; içerik; ortopedi; yayın; yayımlanma eğilimi.

Articles published in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica between 2003-2012: content, characteristics and publication trends

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine publications in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) between 2003 and 2012 using bibliometric methods and to describe publication trends, characteristics and patterns of orthopedic publications in Turkey.

Methods: All articles published in AOTT between 2003 and 2012 were identified and classified according to their study design and subspecialty of orthopedics. The following parameters from each manuscript were also identified: (1) the number of authors, (2) the number of institutions of the authors, (3) institutional affiliation of the first author, (4) origin of country of the first author, (5) sample size, (6) study outcome, (7) presence or absence of statistical methods, (8) presence of funding, and (9) time from submission to acceptance.

Results: A total of 699 eligible articles were identified. The most common study designs were retrospective observational studies and case reports. The most common subspecialties of orthopedics were orthopedic trauma and hand and microsurgery. Institutional affiliation of the first author was a university hospital in 56.4% of the studies and origin of country of the first author was Turkey in 93.4%. Time from submission to acceptance was a mean of 7.11 months.

Conclusion: This study revealed the current status and trends of orthopedic publications in Turkey in the leading Turkish orthopedic journal AOTT over a 10-year period. The impact factor of AOTT shows a slow but stable increasing trend indicating a growing attention towards the journal.

Keywords

• Bibliometric analysis
• content
• orthopedics
• publication
• publication trend

References

1. Rehn C, Kronman U. Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. [Cited 2013 Sep 8]. Available from: http:// ki.se/content/1/c6/01/79/31/bibliometric_handbook_ karolinska_institutet_v_1.05.pdf.
2. Schubert A. Scientometrics in medicine-related fields 1990-1999. Scientometrics 2000;48:251-84.
3. The NLM Catalog. [Cited 2013 Dec 8]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?cmd=historys earch&querykey=3.
4. Demirhan M. From The Editor. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:149-53.
5. Hasenboehler EA, Choudhry IK, Newman JT, Smith WR, Ziran BH, Stahel PF. Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue? Patient Saf Surg 2007;1:4.
6. Önder Kılıçoğlu. Personal communication. January 7, 20 Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. [Cited 2012 Sep 8]. Available from: http://scientific.thomson.com/ products/jcr/.
7. Thomson Reuters. ISI Web of Knowledge. Journal Citation Reports. [Cited 2013 Oct 15]. Available from: http:// admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?PointOfEn try=Home&SID=S2ifUC4xt34M848KJZb.
8. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. [Cited 2013 Dec 8]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025.

9. Moverley R, Rankin KS, McNamara I, Davidson DJ, Reed M, Sprowson AP. Impact factors of orthopedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties. Int Orthop 2013;37:561-7. Lee KM, Ryu MS, Chung CY, Choi IH, Kwon DG, Kim TW, et al. Characteristics and trends of orthopedic publications between 2000 and 2009. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:225-9.
10. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical publication – global profile and trend. Public Health 2003;117:274-80.
11. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:249-52.
12. Ömeroğlu H. The status of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology on national and international platforms in terms of scientific publications. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44: Orthopaedic Forum. III-V. Bhandari M, Busse J, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta III P, et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg 2007;50:119-23.
13. Weale AR, Lear PA. Randomised controlled trials and quality of journals. Lancet 2003;361:1749-50.
14. Author Guidelines. [Cited 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.aott.org.tr/index.php/aott/about/submissions/.
15. Camp M, Escott BG. Authorship proliferation in the orthopedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e44.
16. Yalçınkaya M, Bagatur E. Fate of abstracts presented at a National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress: publication rates and consistency of abstracts compared with their subsequent full-text publications. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013;47:223-30.
17. Rahman L, Muirhead-Allwood SK. How many orthopedic surgeons does it take to write a research article? 50 years of authorship proliferation in and internationalization of the orthopedic surgery literature. Orthopedics 2010;33:478.
18. Namdari S, Jani S, Baldwin K, Mehta S. What is the relationship between number of publications during orthopedic residency and selection of an academic career? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e45.
19. Measurement, Assessment and Documenting: Assignment and promotion criteria. [Text in Turkish] Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Training and Research Council. Turkish Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology. [Cited 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www. totbid.org.tr/Content.aspx?p=1667.