BibTex RIS Cite

Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results

Year 1988, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 18 - 21, 11.09.2006

M. Uzel R. Erginer M. Goksan M. Senocak M. Alver

Abstract

Several different methods such as fluoroscopi, CT scaning, monoplaner or biplaner direct radiography can be used determination of femoral neck torsion angle. In our study femoral neck torsion angle has been determined in one adult skelatal module and 22 hips of 10 adults. CT-scaning, monoplaner (Dunn) and biplaner (Magiligan, Ryder-Crane) direct radiographic methods have been used in the study and the results have been compared by using statistical analysis method. It has been observet that CT scaning is reliable acording to direct visual examination method, Dunn and Ryder-Crane medhods are reliable according to CT scaning. The results of Magiligan method have been found to be different than CT results.

Keywords

-

Bilgisayarlı tomografi ile ölçülen femur boynu torsiyon açılarının monoplaner, biplaner yöntemlerle ölçülmesi ve sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Prospektif çalışma

Year 1988, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 18 - 21, 11.09.2006

M. Uzel R. Erginer M. Goksan M. Senocak M. Alver

Abstract

Femoral torsiyon açısının ölçülmesinde floroskopik, BT, monoplaner, biplaner direkt radiografik metodlar ve ultrasound yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bir erişkin iskelet modeli ve 10 erişkin denekte toplam 22 kalçada femur boynu torsiyon açısı. BT monoplaner (Dunn) ve biplaner yöntemlerle (Magiligan ve Ryder-Crane) ölçüldü. Sonuçlar istatistik açısından karşılaştırıldı. Doğruluk açısından BT’nin direkt gözlem sonuçlarına göre güvenilir, Dunn ve Ryder-Crane metodlarının BT’ye göre güvenilir ve Magiligan yönteminin BT’ye göre farklı olduğu gözlendi.

Keywords

-

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

M. Uzel This is me

R. Erginer This is me

M. Goksan This is me

M. Senocak This is me

M. Alver This is me

Publication Date September 11, 2006
Published in Issue Year 1988 Volume: 22 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Uzel, M., Erginer, R., Goksan, M., Senocak, M., et al. (2006). Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 22(1), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
AMA Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. September 2006;22(1):18-21. doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
Chicago Uzel, M., R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, and M. Alver. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 22, no. 1 (September 2006): 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
EndNote Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M (September 1, 2006) Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22 1 18–21.
IEEE M. Uzel, R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, and M. Alver, “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
ISNAD Uzel, M. et al. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22/1 (September 2006), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
JAMA Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22:18–21.
MLA Uzel, M. et al. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 22, no. 1, 2006, pp. 18-21, doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
Vancouver Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22(1):18-21.