Our study, in Ortopaedics and Traumatology Clinic of the Faculty of Medicine of Cumhuriyet University between April 1986-May 1990 includes the evaluation of 82 hospitalized patients who had pelvic fractures treated surgically and conservatively. Mean age of the patients was 32. 6 and 63 (76.9%) were male, 19 (23. 1%) were female and mean follow up was 29 months. Pelvic fractures were evaluated according to Key and Conwell classification in 3 types. Majeed's functional Slatis and Karaharju's radiological criteria were used in the assesment of the results. In our series anatomically 69.9% and clinically 81.6% satisfactory results were obtained.
Nisan 1986-Mayıs 1990 döneminde Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Uygulama ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Klinigi'ne yatırılarak konservatif ve cerrahi yolla tedavi edilen pelvis kırıklı 82 hasta değerlendirildi. Bunlardan 19'u kadın (%23.1), 63'ü erkek (%76.9) idi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 32.6 olup, hastalar ortalama 29 ay takip edildi.
Serimizdeki hastaların pelvis kırıkları, Key ve Conwell sınıflandırmasına göre 3 tipte değerlendirildi. Sonuçların değerlendirilmesi için Majeed'in fonksiyonel, slatis ve Karaharju'nun radyolojik kriterleri esas alındı. Buna göre tüm olgularımızda çok iyi ve iyi anatomik sonuçlar, %69.9, çok iyi ve iyi fonksiyonel sonuçlar ise %81.6 idi.
Percin, S., Ozmen, B., Unsaldi, T., Akbas, A. (2006). The evaluation of the pelvic fractures. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 26(1), 11-13. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282
AMA
Percin S, Ozmen B, Unsaldi T, Akbas A. The evaluation of the pelvic fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. September 2006;26(1):11-13. doi:10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282
Chicago
Percin, Sitki, Bulent Ozmen, Tansel Unsaldi, and Abdulkadir Akbas. “The Evaluation of the Pelvic Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 26, no. 1 (September 2006): 11-13. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282.
EndNote
Percin S, Ozmen B, Unsaldi T, Akbas A (September 1, 2006) The evaluation of the pelvic fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 26 1 11–13.
IEEE
S. Percin, B. Ozmen, T. Unsaldi, and A. Akbas, “The evaluation of the pelvic fractures”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 11–13, 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282.
ISNAD
Percin, Sitki et al. “The Evaluation of the Pelvic Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 26/1 (September 2006), 11-13. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282.
JAMA
Percin S, Ozmen B, Unsaldi T, Akbas A. The evaluation of the pelvic fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;26:11–13.
MLA
Percin, Sitki et al. “The Evaluation of the Pelvic Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 26, no. 1, 2006, pp. 11-13, doi:10.3944/aott.v26i1.1282.
Vancouver
Percin S, Ozmen B, Unsaldi T, Akbas A. The evaluation of the pelvic fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;26(1):11-3.
