Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Humerus kırıklı olgularda kilitli intramedüller çivi ve plak ile tedavi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Year 2003, Volume: 37 Issue: 2, 120 - 125, 11.09.2006

Abstract

Amaç: Humerus diafiz kırığı nedeniyle, kilitli intramedüller çivi veya plak-vida ile tedavi edilen hastaların sonuçları karşılaştırıldı.
Çalışma planı: Humerus diafiz kırığı nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi gören 60 hasta (43 erkek, 17 kadın; ort. yaş 38; dağılım 19-61) çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların 33’ü kilitli intramedüller çivi, 27’si plak-vida ile tedavi edildi. Fonksiyonel sonuçlar Stewart Hundley ölçütlerine göre değerlendirildi. Kaynama süreleri ve morbiditeleri istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Ortalama takip süresi 42 ay (dağılım 28-72 ay) idi.
Sonuçlar: Hasta grupları arasında iyileşme süreleri bakımından anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Radial sinir paralizisi, plak-vida ile tedavi edilen dört olguda gelişirken, intramedüller çivi ile tedavi edilen olgularda görülmedi. İntramedüller çivi ile tedavi edilen olgularda anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek kaynamama oranı görüldü (p<0.05).
Çıkarımlar: Humerus kırıklarının tedavisinde uygun bir tespit materyali henüz geliştirilememiştir. Kaynamama oranlarının yüksekliğine karşın, uygulamanın daha kolay olması, daha az yumuşak doku diseksiyonu gerektirmesi, düşük oranda morbiditeye yol açması, intramedüller çivileri tedavide iyi bir seçenek haline getirmektedir.

Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures

Year 2003, Volume: 37 Issue: 2, 120 - 125, 11.09.2006

Abstract

Objectives: The results of open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures by either an intramedullary nail or a dynamic compression plate were compared.
Methods: The study included 60 patients (43 males, 17 females; mean age 38 years; range 19 to 61 years) with humerus fractures. Thirty-three patients were treated with
intramedullary nails and 27 patients with dynamic compression plates. Functional results were evaluated according to the Stewart and Hundley’s criteria. The two methods were compared. The mean follow-up period was 42 months (range 28 to 72 months).
Results: Healing times did not differ between the two treatment groups (p>0.05). Radial nerve palsy occurred only in the dynamic compression plate group, with four patients being affected. On the other hand, the rate of nonunion was significantly higher in patients treated with intramedullary nailing (p<0.05).
Conclusion: No ideal fixation technique exists in the treatment of humerus fractures. Despite higher non-union rates, intramedullary nailing may be the method of choice in the treatment of humerus fractures because of such advantages as low morbidity, small dissection of soft tissues, and greater ease of application.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Cumhur Kesemenli This is me

Mehmet Subasi This is me

Huseyin Arslan This is me

Serdar Necmioglu This is me

Ahmet Kapukaya This is me

Publication Date September 11, 2006
Published in Issue Year 2003 Volume: 37 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kesemenli, C., Subasi, M., Arslan, H., Necmioglu, S., et al. (2006). Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 37(2), 120-125.
AMA Kesemenli C, Subasi M, Arslan H, Necmioglu S, Kapukaya A. Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. September 2006;37(2):120-125.
Chicago Kesemenli, Cumhur, Mehmet Subasi, Huseyin Arslan, Serdar Necmioglu, and Ahmet Kapukaya. “Comparison Between the Results of Intramedullary Nailing and Compression Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Humerus Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 37, no. 2 (September 2006): 120-25.
EndNote Kesemenli C, Subasi M, Arslan H, Necmioglu S, Kapukaya A (September 1, 2006) Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 37 2 120–125.
IEEE C. Kesemenli, M. Subasi, H. Arslan, S. Necmioglu, and A. Kapukaya, “Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 120–125, 2006.
ISNAD Kesemenli, Cumhur et al. “Comparison Between the Results of Intramedullary Nailing and Compression Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Humerus Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 37/2 (September 2006), 120-125.
JAMA Kesemenli C, Subasi M, Arslan H, Necmioglu S, Kapukaya A. Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;37:120–125.
MLA Kesemenli, Cumhur et al. “Comparison Between the Results of Intramedullary Nailing and Compression Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Humerus Fractures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 37, no. 2, 2006, pp. 120-5.
Vancouver Kesemenli C, Subasi M, Arslan H, Necmioglu S, Kapukaya A. Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;37(2):120-5.