Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Ön çapraz bağ rekonstrüksiyonunda kullanılan dörtlü hamstring otogreft kalınlığının antropometrik ölçümlerle tahmini

Year 2013, Volume: 47 Issue: 1, 14 - 18, 05.04.2013

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı boy, kilo, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), yaş, uyluk çapı gibi basit antropometrik ölçülerin ön çapraz bağ (ÖÇB) rekonstrüksiyonunda kullanılan hamstring otogreft kalınlığını tahmin etmede kullanılıp kullanılamayacağını araştırmaktı.
Çalışma planı: Ocak 2010 - Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında dörtlü hamstring otogrefti ile ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu uygulanan 164 ardışık erkek hasta prospektif olarak çalışmaya alındı. Ameliyat öncesi hastaların boy, kilo, VKİ, yaş ve uyluk çapları kaydedildi. Ameliyat sırasında hastadan alınan dört katlı hamstring otogreftinin kalınlığı silindirik ölçücülerden geçirilmek suretiyle ölçüldü. Sonuç değişkeni (hamstring greft kalınlığı) ile belirleyici değişkenler (yaş, boy, ağırlık, VKİ, uyluk çapı) arasındaki ilişki korelasyon katsayısı (Pearson r) ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Korelasyon analizinde greft kalınlığı ile hastanın boyu ve kilosu arasında pozitif yönde ilişki bulundu (sırasıyla p=0.000 ve p=0.002). Uzun boylu ve kilosu çok olan hastaların dörtlü hamstring otogrefti kalın olma eğilimindeydi. Bununla birlikte, greft kalınlığı ile yaş, uyluk çapı ve VKİ arasında bir korelasyon saptanmadı (sırasıyla p=0.700, p=0.290 ve p=0.727). Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi değerlendirmesinde ise sadece boy uzunluğunun hamstring greft kalınlığını tahmin etmede istatistiksel anlamda önemli olduğu görüldü. (R2=0.157, p=0.0001). Dörtlü hamstring greft kalınlığını tahmin etmede greft kalınlığı=[(cm cinsinden boy ¥ 0.052) - 1.07] mm şeklinde regresyon eşitlemesi bulundu.
Çıkarımlar: Erkek hastalarda dörtlü hamstring otogreft kalınlığını tahmin etmede hastanın boy uzunluğunu ölçmek pratik ve doğru bir yöntemdir. Ameliyat öncesi dönemde hamstring tendonu otogreft kalınlığını tahmin edebilmek; özellikle greftin yetersiz olacağı düşünülen durumlarda cerrahın yeni bir strateji geliştirmesi açısından gereklidir.

References

  • Romanini E, D'Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, et al. Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:211-9.
  • West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13: 197-20
  • Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Holden JP, Noyes FR, Levy MS, Butler DL, et al. The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Orthop Res 1992;10:878-85.
  • Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N. Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. Arthroscopy 2005;21:917-22.
  • Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM. Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:1945-9.
  • Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM. Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:2204-9.
  • Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C. Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). 2008;37:157-9.
  • Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD. Can preoperative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 2010;17:81-3.
  • Pinheiro LF Jr, de Andrade MA, Teixeira LE, Bicalho LA, Lemos WG, Azeredo SA, et al. Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:811-5.
  • Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:549-57.
  • Handl M, Drzík M, Cerulli G, Pov˘sil C, Chlpík J, Varga F, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:233-41.
  • Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, Hung SC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20: 916Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging crosssectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2008;24:1336-41.
  • Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring doublebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1055-9.
  • Beyzadeoglu T, Akgun U, Tasdelen N, Karahan M. Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:1293
  • Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M. Predictive value of 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006;22:259-64.
  • Hamada M, Shino K, Mitsuoka T, Abe N, Horibe S. Crosssectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1998;14:696-701.

Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures

Year 2013, Volume: 47 Issue: 1, 14 - 18, 05.04.2013

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether simple anthropometric measurements, such as height, weight, body mass index (BMI), age, and thigh circumference can be used to accurately predict the diameter of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery.
Methods: One hundred sixty-four consecutive male patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadruple hamstring autograft between January 2010 and December 2011 were prospectively evaluated. Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, BMI, age and thigh circumference were recorded preoperatively. The thickness of the quadruple hamstring autograft was intraoperatively determined using sizing cylinders. Correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r) and stepwise, multiple linear regression were used to determine the relationship between the outcome variable (hamstring graft diameter) and the predictor variables (age, height, weight, BMI, thigh circumference).
Results: Correlation analysis revealed a positive relation between the height, weight and graft thickness (p=0.000 and p=0.002, respectively). Taller and heavier patients tended to have thicker quadrupled hamstring graft. However, age, thigh circumference, and BMI did not correlate with the graft thickness (p=0.700, p=0.290 and p=0.727, respectively). Stepwise, multiple linear regression indicated that height was statistically important as a predictor for hamstring graft diameter (R2 =0.157, p=0.0001) and yielded the following regression equation for predicting quadrupled hamstring graft thickness: graft thickness = [(height in cm) × 0.052) - 1.07] mm.
Conclusion: Height can be used as a practical and accurate measurement to preoperatively predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter in male patients. Identification of possible hamstring tendon autograft insufficiency allows for preoperative determination of additional graft source possibilities, resulting in a more prompt surgical strategy.

References

  • Romanini E, D'Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, et al. Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:211-9.
  • West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13: 197-20
  • Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Holden JP, Noyes FR, Levy MS, Butler DL, et al. The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Orthop Res 1992;10:878-85.
  • Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Nakamura N. Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. Arthroscopy 2005;21:917-22.
  • Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM. Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:1945-9.
  • Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM. Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:2204-9.
  • Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C. Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). 2008;37:157-9.
  • Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD. Can preoperative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 2010;17:81-3.
  • Pinheiro LF Jr, de Andrade MA, Teixeira LE, Bicalho LA, Lemos WG, Azeredo SA, et al. Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:811-5.
  • Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:549-57.
  • Handl M, Drzík M, Cerulli G, Pov˘sil C, Chlpík J, Varga F, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:233-41.
  • Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, Hung SC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20: 916Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging crosssectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2008;24:1336-41.
  • Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring doublebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1055-9.
  • Beyzadeoglu T, Akgun U, Tasdelen N, Karahan M. Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:1293
  • Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M. Predictive value of 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006;22:259-64.
  • Hamada M, Shino K, Mitsuoka T, Abe N, Horibe S. Crosssectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1998;14:696-701.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Mustafa Celiktas This is me

Alper Golpinar This is me

Ozkan Kose This is me

Zeynel Sutoluk This is me

Kamile Celebi This is me

Yaman Sarpel This is me

Publication Date April 5, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 47 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Celiktas, M., Golpinar, A., Kose, O., Sutoluk, Z., et al. (2013). Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 47(1), 14-18.
AMA Celiktas M, Golpinar A, Kose O, Sutoluk Z, Celebi K, Sarpel Y. Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. April 2013;47(1):14-18.
Chicago Celiktas, Mustafa, Alper Golpinar, Ozkan Kose, Zeynel Sutoluk, Kamile Celebi, and Yaman Sarpel. “Prediction of the Quadruple Hamstring Autograft Thickness in ACL Reconstruction Using Anthropometric Measures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 47, no. 1 (April 2013): 14-18.
EndNote Celiktas M, Golpinar A, Kose O, Sutoluk Z, Celebi K, Sarpel Y (April 1, 2013) Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 47 1 14–18.
IEEE M. Celiktas, A. Golpinar, O. Kose, Z. Sutoluk, K. Celebi, and Y. Sarpel, “Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 2013.
ISNAD Celiktas, Mustafa et al. “Prediction of the Quadruple Hamstring Autograft Thickness in ACL Reconstruction Using Anthropometric Measures”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 47/1 (April 2013), 14-18.
JAMA Celiktas M, Golpinar A, Kose O, Sutoluk Z, Celebi K, Sarpel Y. Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2013;47:14–18.
MLA Celiktas, Mustafa et al. “Prediction of the Quadruple Hamstring Autograft Thickness in ACL Reconstruction Using Anthropometric Measures”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 47, no. 1, 2013, pp. 14-18.
Vancouver Celiktas M, Golpinar A, Kose O, Sutoluk Z, Celebi K, Sarpel Y. Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2013;47(1):14-8.