Bir Ulusal Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi’nde sunulan özetlerin akıbeti: Yayımlanma oranları ve özetler ile yayımlanmış makaleler arasındaki uyum

Year 2013, Volume: 47 Issue: 4, 223 - 230, 18.09.2013

Merter Yalcinkaya A. Erdem Bagatur

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bir Ulusal Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi’nde sunulan bildirilerin daha sonra makale olarak yayımlanma oranlarını incelemek, bildirilerin kongrede sunulduktan ne kadar süre sonra makale olarak yayımlandığını saptamak ve bildiri özetleri ile yayımlanmış makaleler arasındaki uyum düzeyini değerlendirmekti.
Çalışma planı: 2007 yılında düzenlenen 20. Ulusal Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi bilimsel programında yer alan tüm bildiri özetleri tanımlandı. Bildirilerin makale olarak yayımlanıp yayımlanmadığını saptamak için bilgisayarlı PubMed taramaları yapıldı ve bildiri özeti ile yayımlanmış makale arasındaki uyumu değerlendirmek amacıyla bildiri özeti ve yayımlanmış makalenin temel özellikleri incelendi ve karşılaştırıldı. Makalelerin yayımlanmasına kadar geçen süre ile makalelerin yayımlanmış olduğu dergilerin etki katsayıları kaydedildi.
Bulgular: Yedi yüz yetmiş (264 sözel, 506 poster) bildiri özetinden 227’sinin (%29.5) tam metnine ulaşıldı; 264 sözel bildirinin 116’sının (%44) ve 506 poster bildirinin 111’inin (%22) makale olarak yayımlandığı saptandı. Makalelerin ortalama yayımlanma süresi 14.9±16.075 (dağılım: -33-55) ay olarak bulundu. Otuz üç makale (%14.5) kongreden önce yayımlanmıştı. Bildirilerin makale olarak yayımlanma olasılığı üçüncü yıldan sonra azalmaktaydı (227 makalenin 26’sı, %11.5). Makalelerin 182’si (%80.2) bildiri özetleri ile uyumsuzluk göstermekteydi. Makalelerin 74’ünde (%32.6) minör, 14’ünde (6.2%) majör, 94’ünde ise (%41.4) hem minör hem de majör uyumsuzluk vardı. Makalelerin yayımlanmış olduğu dergilerin ortalama etki katsayısı 1.152±0.858 idi.
Çıkarımlar: Bu kongrede sunulan bildirilerin büyük çoğunluğu ilerleyen zamanlarda bir makale olarak yayımlanmamıştı ve bildiri özeti ile makale arasında sıkça görülen uyumsuzluklar bildiri özetlerinde bir nitelik yetersizliğine işaret etmekteydi.

Keywords

Bildiri özeti; bilimsel toplantı; dizinli dergi; hakemli dergi; kongre; ortopedi; sunum; yayın

Fate of abstracts presented at a National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress: publication rates and consistency of abstracts compared with their subsequent full-text publications

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the publication rates of full-text articles after presentation of abstracts at a Turkish National Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress, determine the time lag from the congress date to publication of full-text articles and assess the consistency between abstracts and the subsequent publications.
Methods: All abstracts from the scientific program of the 20th Turkish National Orthopedics and Traumatology Congress (2007) were identified and computerized PubMed searches were conducted to determine whether an abstract had been followed by publication of a full-text article and key features were compared to evaluate their consistency. The time lag to publication and the impact factors of the journals where the articles were published were noted.
Results: Of the 770 abstracts (264 oral, 506 poster presentations), 227 (29.5%) were followed by a fulltext and 116 (44%) of the 264 oral and 111 (22%) of the 506 poster presentations were published. The mean time to publication was 14.9±16.075 (range: -33 to 55) months. Thirty-three (14.5%) were published prior to the presentation at the congress. The likelihood of publication decreased after the third year (26 of 227, 11.5%). A total of 182 (80.2%) articles showed inconsistencies with the abstract; 74 (32.6%) minor, 14 (6.2%) major, and 94 (41.4%) minor and major inconsistencies. The mean impact factor of the journals was 1.152±0.858.
Conclusion: The vast majority of abstracts presented at this congress were not followed by publication of a full-text article. Additionally, frequent inconsistencies between the final published article and the original abstract indicated the inadequacy of quality of reporting in abstracts.

Keywords

Abstract, congress, indexed journal, orthopedics, peer-reviewed journal, presentation, publication, scientific meeting

References

• Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:615-21.
• Daluiski A, Kuhns CA, Jackson KR, Lieberman JR. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 1998;16: 645Lloyd EW, Geller JA, Iorio R, Yoon RS, Huo M, Macaulay W. Publication rates of scientific presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons annual meetings from 1996 to 2001. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:2-5.
• XX. Milli Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007;41:Suppl 3.
• Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. http://scientific. thomson.com/products/jcr/ (Accessed September 8, 2012).
• Scientific Journal Rankings. http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php. (Accessed September 8, 2012).
• Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1428
• Preston CF, Bhandari M, Fulkerson E, Ginat D, Egol KA, Koval KJ. The consistency between scientific papers presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their subsequent full-text publication. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20: 129Roukis TS. Publication rates of manuscript presentations at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Annual Scientific Conference between 1999 and 2008. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50:416-9.
• Kwong Y, Kwong FN, Patel J. Publication rate of Trauma abstracts presented at an International Orthopaedic conference. Injury 2007;38:745-9.
• DeMola PM, Hill DL, Rogers K, Abboud JA. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1629-33.
• Whitehouse MR, Atwal NS, Blom AW. Publication rates for hip surgery-related abstracts presented at national and international meetings. Orthopedics 2009;32:407.
• Seçil M, Uçar G, Sentürk Ç, Karasu S, Dicle O. Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:69-73.
• Hamlet WP, Fletcher A, Meals RA. Publication patterns of papers presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1138-43.
• Guryel E, Durrant AW, Alakeson R, Ricketts DM. From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:70-2. ul Haq MI, Gill I. Observational analysis of BOA free-papers (2001): from presentation to publication and comparison with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Injury 2011;42:418-20.
• Schulte TL, Trost M, Osada N, Huck K, Lange T, Gosheger G, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132: 271Schulte TL, Huck K, Osada N, Trost M, Lange T, Schmidt C, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000-2003). Eur Spine J 2012;21:2105-12.
• Amirhamzeh D, Moor MA, Baldwin K, Hosalkar HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at pediatric orthopaedic society of North America meetings between 2002 and 2006. J Pediatr Orthop 2012 ;32:e6-e10.
• Varghese RA, Chang J, Miyanji F, Reilly CW, Mulpuri K. Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America: is there a difference between accepted versus rejected abstracts? J Pediatr Orthop 2011;31:334-40.
• Eck JC. Publication rates of abstracts presented at Biennial Meetings of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005;13:426-9.
• Kleweno CP, Bryant WK, Jacir AM, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. Discrepancies and rates of publication in orthopaedic sports medicine abstracts. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1875-9. Nguyen V, Tornetta P 3rd, Bkaric M. Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. Orthopaedic Trauma Association. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:457-9.
• Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB. The publication rates of presentations at major Spine Specialty Society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine 1999;24:425-7.
• Yoon RS, Lloyd EW, McGrory B, Bal BS, Macaulay W. Studies presented in poster format at the annual meetings of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: how do they fare in the peer review process? J Arthroplasty 2007; 22:17-20.
• Ayd›ngöz Ö. Report. [Text in Turkish] 21st Turkish National Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress, 3-8 November 2009, Çeflme, Turkey. Archives, Turkish Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology.
• Ömero¤lu H. 22nd Turkish National Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress Data. 31 October - 5 November 2011, Belek Congress Center, Belek, Antalya. Archives, Turkish Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology.
• Author Guidelines. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. http://www.aott.org.tr/index.php/aott/about/submissions#authorGuidelines (Accessed September 1, 2012).
• Authorship. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, http://jbjs.org/public/instructionsauthors.aspx#Authorship (Accessed September 1, 2012).
• Zelle BA, Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M. Discrepancies between proceedings abstracts and posters at a scientific meeting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(435):245-9.
• Measurement, Assessment and Documenting: Assignment and promotion criteria. [Text in Turkish] Turkish Orthopaedics and Traumatology Training and Research Council. Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, (http://www.totbid.org.tr/Content.aspx? p=1667) (Accessed 1 September 2012).
• Lee KM, Ryu MS, Chung CY, Choi IH, Kwon DG, Kim TW, et al. Characteristics and trends of orthopedic publications between 2000 and 2009. Clin Orthop Surg 2011;3:225-9.