Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants

Roman Oliviu; Ancuța Zazgyva; Sâmpălean Septimiu; Nagy Örs; Pop Sorin

Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants

Year 2016, Volume: 50 Issue: 2, 125 - , 11.03.2016

Roman Oliviu Ancuța Zazgyva Sâmpălean Septimiu Nagy Örs Pop Sorin

Abstract

Objective: Single-radius femoral total knee endoprosthesis designs were introduced with the promise of better clinical and functional results by means of superior biomechanical characteristics. The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term clinical, functional, radiologic, and survivorship outcomes of 2 types of posterior-stabilized knee replacement systems: the single-radius Scorpio® (Stryker®, Mahwah, NJ, USA) and the multi-radius NexGen® (Zimmer®, Warsaw, IN, USA).
Methods: This retrospective observational study included 139 patients (164 knees) that underwent total knee replacement (TKR) between October 2004 and December 2010: 94 knees (75 patients) with Scorpio® and 70 knees (64 patients) with NexGen®. The 2 patient groups were similar in terms of age, gender ratio, diagnosis, disease stage, and knee joint alignment. Mean follow-up times were 35 (range: 12–112) months and 32 (range: 13–75) months, respectively. Evaluation was based on the Knee Society scores (KSS) and the Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System, with survival data compiled using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Results: Clinical and functional improvements were recorded in all cases, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 patient groups. Survivorship was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.8–99.8%) for the multi-radius implant at 60 months and 92.7% (95% CI: 87.7–97.7%) for the single-radius implant at 84 months, with no significant difference (p=0.31).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both single-radius and multi-radius posterior-stabilized knee endoprostheses can significantly reduce pain and improve knee joint function in patients if used with a proper technique, with the additional benefit of good mid-term survivorship.

Keywords

Mid-term results; multi-radius; posterior-stabilized; single-radius; total knee replacement.

Year 2016, Volume: 50 Issue: 2, 125 - , 11.03.2016

Roman Oliviu Ancuța Zazgyva Sâmpălean Septimiu Nagy Örs Pop Sorin

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Journal Section	Original Article
Authors	Roman Oliviu This is me Ancuța Zazgyva This is me Sâmpălean Septimiu This is me Nagy Örs This is me Pop Sorin This is me
Publication Date	March 11, 2016
Published in Issue	Year 2016 Volume: 50 Issue: 2

Cite

APA	Oliviu, R., Zazgyva, A., Septimiu, S., Örs, N., et al. (2016). Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 50(2), 125.
AMA	Oliviu R, Zazgyva A, Septimiu S, Örs N, Sorin P. Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. March 2016;50(2):125.
Chicago	Oliviu, Roman, Ancuța Zazgyva, Sâmpălean Septimiu, Nagy Örs, and Pop Sorin. “Mid-Term Results of Total Knee Replacement With Single-Radius Versus Multi-Radius Posterior-Stabilized Implants”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica 50, no. 2 (March 2016): 125.
EndNote	Oliviu R, Zazgyva A, Septimiu S, Örs N, Sorin P (March 1, 2016) Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 50 2 125.
IEEE	R. Oliviu, A. Zazgyva, S. Septimiu, N. Örs, and P. Sorin, “Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 50, no. 2, p. 125, 2016.
ISNAD	Oliviu, Roman et al. “Mid-Term Results of Total Knee Replacement With Single-Radius Versus Multi-Radius Posterior-Stabilized Implants”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 50/2 (March 2016), 125.
JAMA	Oliviu R, Zazgyva A, Septimiu S, Örs N, Sorin P. Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2016;50:125.
MLA	Oliviu, Roman et al. “Mid-Term Results of Total Knee Replacement With Single-Radius Versus Multi-Radius Posterior-Stabilized Implants”. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 50, no. 2, 2016, p. 125.
Vancouver	Oliviu R, Zazgyva A, Septimiu S, Örs N, Sorin P. Mid-term results of total knee replacement with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized implants. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2016;50(2):125.