Pozitivizm, Yapılandırmacılık ve Sosyal Yapısalcılığın Aile Terapisi Üzerindeki Etkileri

Year 2020, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 1 - 28, 30.12.2020

İsa Özgür Özer

Abstract

Günümüze kadar olan gelişimi boyunca aile terapisi, iki büyük bilimsel hareket ve bu hareketlerin getirdiği üç farklı bakış açısından etkilenmiştir. Bunlar pozitivizm, yapılandırmacılık ve sosyal yapısalcılıktır. Bu makalede amaç, bu üç bakış açısının aile terapisine etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaçla; pozitivist aile terapileri (yapısal ve stratejik aile terapisi), yapılandırmacı aile terapileri (Milan ve Post Milan yaklaşımları) ve sosyal yapısalcı aile terapilerinin (Çözüm Odaklı Yaklaşım, Öyküsel Yaklaşım, İşbirlikçi Dil Sistemleri) insan doğasına bakış ve terapötik süreç bakımından epistemolojik karşılaştırmaları yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bilgiler tartışılmış, araştırmacı ve uygulayıcılar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

aile terapisi, aile terapisinin gelişimi, pozitivizm, sosyal yapısalcılık, yapılandırmacılık

References

• Andersen ,T. (1992). Reflections on reflecting with families. In S. Mcnamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.). Therapy as social construction (pp. 54-68). CA: Sage.
• Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta‐dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26(4), 415-428.
• Andersen, T. (1991). The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about the dialogues. NY: WW Norton & Company.
• Andersen, T. (1997). Researching client-therapist relationships: A collaborative study for informing therapy. Journal of systemic therapies, 16(2), 125-133.
• Anderson, H. (2012). Reflections on Kenneth Gergen’s contributions to family therapy. Psychological Studies, 57(2), 142-149.
• Anderson, H. D. (2003). Postmodern social construction therapies. In T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, & M. S. Robbins (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy: The science and practice of working with families and couples. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
• Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. Mcnamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.). Therapy as social construction (pp. 25-39). CA: Sage.
• Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27(4), 371-393.
• Avis, P. (1990). Strategic family therapy, structural family therapy and constructivism (Unpublished master’s thesis). Rand Africaan University.
• Barker, P., & Chang, J. (2013). Basic family therapy (6th ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology mind. NY: Ballantine Books.
• Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral science, 1(4), 251-264.
• Becvar, D. S. (2003). Eras of epistemology. In Robbins, M., Sexton, T., & Weeks, G. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 3-22). NY: Routledge.
• Berg, I. K.,, & De Shazer, S. (1993). Making numbers talk: Language in therapy. In Friedman, S. (Eds.), The new language in change: Constructive collaboration in psychotherapy (pp. 5-24). NY: Guilford Press.
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. GB: Penguin Books.
• Bertolino, B., & O'Hanlon, W. H. (2002). Collaborative, competency-based counseling and therapy. NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Burbatti, G. L., & Formenti, L. (1988). The Milan approach to family therapy. NY: Aronson.
• Campbell, D. (1999). Family therapy and beyond: Where is the Milan systemic approach today?. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 4(2), 76-84.
• Campbell, D., Draper, R., & Huffington, C. (1992). Second thoughts on the theory and practice of the milan approach to family therapy. London: Karnac Books.
• Carr, A. (2006). Family therapy: Concepts, process, practice (2th ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26(4), 405-413.
• Cecchin, G., Lane, G., & Ray, W. A. (1993). From strategizing to nonintervention: Toward irreverence in systemic practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19(2), 125-136.
• Cevizci, A. (1999). Felsefe sözlüğü (3. Baskı). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
• Corey, G. (2005). Theory of counseling and psychotherapy.CA: Cengage.
• Dallos, R. (1997). Interacting stories: Narratives, family believes and practices. London: Karnac Books.
• Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2005). An introduction to family therapy: Systemic theory and practice (2th ed.). NY: Open University Press
• De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2013). Interviewing for solutions (4th ed.). CA: Cengage.
• Dell, P. F. (1982). Beyond homeostasis: Toward a concept of coherence. Family Process, 21(1), 21-41.
• Dickerson, V. C. (2014). The advance of poststructuralism and its influence on family therapy. Family Process, 53(3), 401-414.
• Epston, D., White, M., & Murray, K. (1992). A proposal for a re-authoring therapy: Rose's revisioning of her life and a commentary. In S. Mcnamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.). Therapy as social construction (pp. 96-115). CA: Sage.
• Flaskas, C. (2002). Family therapy beyond postmodernism: Practice challenges theory. NY: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1975) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Random House.
• Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. NY: Norton & Company.
• Freud, S. (1920). A general introduction to psychoanalysis.NY: Boni and Liveright.
• Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1948). Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 11(3), 263-273.
• Fruggeri, L. (1992). Therapeutic process as the social construction of change. In S. Mcnamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.). Therapy as social construction (pp. 40-53). CA: Sage.
• Galbin, A. (2014). An introduction to social constructionism. Social Research Reports, 26(1), 82-92.
• Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.
• Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 803-813.
• Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2008). Family therapy: An overview. CA: Thomson Higher Education.
• Goldner, V. (1985). Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24(1), 31-47.
• Goldner, V. (1991). Feminism and systemic practice: Two critical traditions in transition. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 10(3/4), 118-126.
• Haley, J., & Richeport-Haley, M. (2003). The art of strategic therapy. NY: Routledge.
• Hanna, S. M. (2019). The practice of family therapy: Key elements across models (5th ed.). NY: Routledge.
• Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1991). Sex, lies, and headaches: The problem is power. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 3(1/2), 39-61.
• Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process, 29(1), 1-12.
• Hoffman, L. (1993). Exchanging voices: A collaborative approach to family therapy. London: Karnac Books.
• Jackson, D. (1965). The study of the family. Family Process,4(1), 1-20.
• Jackson, D. D. (1957). The question of family homeostasis. The Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement, 31(1), 79-90.
• Keeney, B. P. (1983). Aesthetics of change.NY: Guilford Press.
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lidz, T., Cornelison, A. R., Fleck, S., & Terry, D. (1957). The intrafamilial environment of schizophrenic patients: II. Marital schism and marital skew. American journal of Psychiatry, 114(3), 241-248.
• MacKinnon, L. K., & Miller, D. (1987). The new epistemology and the milan approach: Feminist and sociopolitical considerations. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13(2), 139-155.
• Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.). Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
• Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis: The organization of the living. Boston: Reidel Publishing.
• Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Massachusetts: Harvard Uniiversity Press.
• Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Mitrani, V. B., & Perez, M. A. (2003). Structural-strategic approaches to couple and family therapy. In Robbins, M., Sexton, T., & Weeks, G. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 203-231). NY: Routledge.
• Nichols, M. P. (2014). The Essentials of family therapy (6th ed.). US: Pearson Education.
• Nichols, M. P., & Davis, S. D. (2017). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (11th ed.). Hoboken: Pearson.
• Penn, P. (1982). Circular questioning. Family process, 21(3), 267-280.
• Pirotta, S., & Cecchin, G. (1988). Milan training program. In Liddle, H. A., Breunlin, D. C., & Schwartz, R. C. (Eds.). Handbook of family therapy training and supervision (pp. 38-61). NY: Guilford Press.
• Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179(250), 379-399.
• Selvini, M. P., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing—circularity—neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family process, 19(1), 3-12.
• Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G. F., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction. New York: Aronson.
• Simon, R. (1987). Goodbye paradox, hello invariant prescription: An interview with Mara Selvini-Palazzoli. The Family Therapy Networker, 11(5), 16-25.
• Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 168-172.
• Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behaviour. London: Pearson Education.
• Tolstoi, L. N. (1899). Anna karenina (N. H. Dole, Trans.), NY: Thomas Y. Crowell & Company. (Original work published 1877)
• Tomm, K. (1984). One perspective on the Milan systemic approach: Part I. Overview of development, theory and practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10(2), 113-125.
• Tomm, K. (1984). One perspective on the Milan systemic approach: Part II. Description of session format, interviewing style and interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10(3), 253-271.
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. NY: George Braziller.
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In Watzlawick, P. (Eds.), The Invented reality: how do we know what we believe we know?: contributions to constructivism (pp. 17-40). NY: Norton.
• Weakland, J. H., Fisch, R., Watzlawick, P., & Bodin, A. M. (1974). Brief therapy: Focused problem resolution. Family Process, 13(2), 141-168.
• Weisskopf, S. (1980). Maternal sexuality and asexual motherhood. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 766-782.
• Wetchler, J. L., & Hecker, L. L. (2015). An introduction to marriage and family therapy (2th ed.). NY: Routledge.
• White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. NY: WW Norton & Company.
• White, M., & Epston, D. (2004). Externalizing the problem. In C. Malone, L. Forbat, M. Robb, & J. Seden (Eds.). Relating experience: Stories from health and social care (pp. 88-94). NY: Routledge.
• Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2th ed.). Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.