Research Article

Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances

Volume: 14 Number: 1 January 31, 2026

Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances

Abstract

The brain is one of the body's most critical structures, governing or controlling all organs. Therefore, damage to the brain can have life-threatening effects. Midline shift (MLS), on the other hand, is a serious condition that results from the migration of brain compartments from one to the other for various reasons, leading to various neurological symptoms such as increased cranial pressure, impaired consciousness, paralysis, and even brain death. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial in cases of MLS. The first step in diagnosing MLS is identifying the ventricles, one of the structures that define the midline in the brain. The ventricles can be visualized in different ways depending on the case, increasing the risk of physicians making errors in the initial diagnosis. The aim of this study is to create an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ventricle detection architecture that will assist physicians in minimizing this error. For this purpose, Faster Region Based Convolutional Networks (Faster R-CNN), You Only Look Once X (YOLOX), Cascade Region Based Convolutional Neural Network (Cascade R-CNN), Efficient Detection (EfficientDet), enhanced YOLO versions (YOLOv8n, YOLO11n) and current transformer-based deep learning (DL) architecture Shifted Window Transformer (Swin Transformer) were tested. The study was conducted on the mainly CQ500 dataset and results were validated with a subset of tests obtained from the RSNA brain hemorrhage dataset. Both datasets are open and marked with a bounding box technique. Comparisons of current DL models reveal which models are more advantageous in which situations. Furthermore, the inclusion of an open dataset provides a basis for future research.

Keywords

References

  1. M. S. Greenberg, Handbook of Neurosurgery, 7th ed. Thieme, pp 84-122, 2010.
  2. M. S. Greenberg, Handbook of Neurosurgery, 7th ed. Thieme, pp 850-930, 2010.
  3. J. Motuel, I. Biette, C. Cognard, O. Fourcade, and T. Geeraerts, "Brain midline shift assessment using sonography in neurocritical care patients," Critical Care, vol. 15, suppl. 1, P343, 2011, doi: 10.1186/cc9763.
  4. F. Xiao, I.-J. Chiang, J.-M. Wong, Y.-H. Tsai, K.-C. Huang, and C.-C. Liao, "Automatic measurement of midline shift on deformed brains using Multiresolution Binary Level Set method and Hough Transform," Computer Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 756–762, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.011.
  5. S. Cha and A. E. George, "How much asymmetry should be considered normal variation or within normal range in asymmetrical frontal horns of the lateral ventricles noted during CT brain scans without evidence of midline shift or any other significant lesion?," AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 178, no. 1, 240, 2002, doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780240a.
  6. W.-S. Yang, Q. Li, R. Li, Q.-J. Liu, X.-C. Wang, L.-B. Zhao, and P. Xie, "Defining the optimal midline shift threshold to predict poor outcome in patients with supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage," Neurocritical Care, vol. 28, pp. 314–321, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0483-7.
  7. Y. Zhu, X. Jin, L. Xu, P. Han, S. Lin, and Z. Lu, "Establishment and validation of prognosis model for patients with cerebral contusion," BMC Neurology, vol. 21, 463, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02482-4.
  8. R. A. G. Oliveira, M. de Oliveira Lima, W. S. Paiva, L. M. de Sá Malbouisson, M. J. Teixeira, and E. Bor-Seng-Shu, "Comparison between brain computed tomography scan and transcranial sonography to evaluate third ventricle width, peri-mesencephalic cistern, and sylvian fissure in traumatic brain-injured patients," Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 8, 44, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00044.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Deep Learning, Machine Vision

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 31, 2026

Submission Date

August 25, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 14 Number: 1

APA
Gençtürk, T. H., Kaya Gülağız, F., & Kaya, İ. (2026). Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, 14(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1771865
AMA
1.Gençtürk TH, Kaya Gülağız F, Kaya İ. Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances. APJESS. 2026;14(1):66-75. doi:10.21541/apjess.1771865
Chicago
Gençtürk, Tuğrul Hakan, Fidan Kaya Gülağız, and İsmail Kaya. 2026. “Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14 (1): 66-75. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1771865.
EndNote
Gençtürk TH, Kaya Gülağız F, Kaya İ (January 1, 2026) Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14 1 66–75.
IEEE
[1]T. H. Gençtürk, F. Kaya Gülağız, and İ. Kaya, “Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances”, APJESS, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 66–75, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.21541/apjess.1771865.
ISNAD
Gençtürk, Tuğrul Hakan - Kaya Gülağız, Fidan - Kaya, İsmail. “Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14/1 (January 1, 2026): 66-75. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1771865.
JAMA
1.Gençtürk TH, Kaya Gülağız F, Kaya İ. Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances. APJESS. 2026;14:66–75.
MLA
Gençtürk, Tuğrul Hakan, et al. “Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2026, pp. 66-75, doi:10.21541/apjess.1771865.
Vancouver
1.Tuğrul Hakan Gençtürk, Fidan Kaya Gülağız, İsmail Kaya. Ventricle Detection Case Study: Comparison of Current Deep Learning Architecture Performances. APJESS. 2026 Jan. 1;14(1):66-75. doi:10.21541/apjess.1771865

Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems