A STUDY ON THE PROBLEM OF MEANING IN THE ART OF SCULPTURE
Abstract
This study explores the complex relationship between the meaning of sculpture and its making process in the context of the philosophy of language. Sculpture is a unique art form that involves the creation of three-dimensional objects that occupy physical space. However, the meaning of a sculpture is not limited to its spatial characteristics alone. This study identifies two distinct levels of meaning in sculpture: its relation to space and its making process. While the former has received considerable attention in the literature, the latter has been largely overlooked. Therefore, this study focuses on the semantic relationship between Richard Serra's sculptures and his sculpture-making processes, particularly in his early works.
Richard Serra is widely regarded as one of the most important artists of the Process Art movement, which emerged in the 1960s and emphasizes the importance of the making process in art. The study questions the reduction of the meaning of sculpture to a mere action and seeks to establish a deeper relationship between the philosophy of language and the process of sculpture. To achieve this, the study draws on the works of Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, and John R. Searle, who are some of the most important philosophers of language of the 20th century.
Wittgenstein's concept of language games and his emphasis on the social context of language use is particularly relevant to this study. The study explores how Serra's sculpture-making processes can be seen as a form of language game, with its own rules and conventions. Similarly, Austin's concept of performative language provides a framework for understanding how the making process of a sculpture can be seen as a form of performative action. The study also draws on Searle's theory of speech acts, which suggests that language use is not just a matter of describing the world, but also of performing actions and creating new realities.
Overall, this study represents an important contribution to the field of art and philosophy. By exploring the relationship between the meaning of sculpture and its making process, the study challenges traditional notions of art and raises important questions about the nature of meaning and representation in art. The study also demonstrates the relevance of the philosophy of language to the study of art and provides a framework for future research in this area.
Keywords
References
- Austin, John, L., (1962), How to do Things with Words, The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Oxford University Press, Amen House, London, E.C. 4
- Biryukova, M., (2017), Reconsidering the Exhibition When Attitudes Become Form Curated by Harald Szeemann: Form Versus “anti-form” in Contemporary Art, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 9:1, 1362309
- Buchloh, Benjamin H. D., (2000), Process Sculpture and Film in the Work of Richard Serra, (Richard Serra, ed: Hal Foster with Gordon Hughes), October Files, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England
- Grant, K., (2017), All About Process: The Theory and Discourse of Modern Artistic Labour, The Pennsylvania State University Press | University Park, Pennsylvania
- Heaton, John, M., (2000), Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis, Icon Books Ltd., Grange Road, Duxford, Cambridge CBF 4QF
- Heidegger, M., (2002), Off the Beaten Track, Edited and Translated by Jullian Young and Kenneth Haynes, Cambridge University Press, UK
- Krauss, R., E., (1981), Passages in Modern Sculpture, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England
- Krauss, R., E., (1986), Richard Serra: Sculpture, (Richard Serra, ed: Hal Foster with Gordon Hughes), October Files, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England
- Monte, J., (1969), Anti-Illusion : Procedures /Materials, Witney Museum of American Art, Anti-Illusion : Procedures /Materials Sergisi Katalogu, S. D. Scott Printing Co., Inc., New York
- Penny, N., (1993), The Materials of Sculpture, Yale University Press, London,