The mediation role of information sharing and competitive advantage in the effect of supply chain strategies on supply chain performance

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 21 - 31, 30.06.2024

Murat Kurnuç Dilşad Güzel

https://doi.org/10.58588/aru-jfeas.1387080

Abstract

In this study, the effect of supply chain strategies of firms operating in Turkey that produce meat and meat products on information sharing and competitive advantage, and the effect of information sharing and competitive advantage on supply chain performance were investigated. In addition, whether information sharing and competitive advantage play a mediating role in the effect of supply chain strategies on supply chain performance has also been examined within the scope of the study. In order to test the models and hypotheses developed in line with the purpose of the study, a questionnaire was applied to meat and meat products producers operating in Turkey. Following the application, 408 valid surveys were obtained. The data obtained as a result of the survey application were analyzed through SPSS and AMOS programs. As a result of the structural equation analysis, it was seen that lean and agile supply chain strategies affect the competitive advantage of the firms by sharing information with customers and suppliers. Sharing information with customers affected only resource performance, while sharing information with suppliers affected both production and flexibility performance. Competitive advantage, on the other hand, had an impact on resource, production and flexibility performance. In the analysis results to determine the intermediary effects, it was seen that all other mediation roles, except the mediation role of information sharing with customers and suppliers, on the resource performance of the agile supply chain strategy.

Keywords

Supply Chain Management, Supply Chain Strategies, Information Sharing, Competitive Advantage, Supply Chain Performance

Tedarik zinciri stratejilerinin tedarik zinciri performansı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımı ve rekabet avantajının aracı rolü

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan et ve et ürünleri üreten işletmelerin tedarik zinciri stratejilerinin bilgi paylaşımı ve rekabet avantajı üzerindeki etkisi ile bilgi paylaşımı ve rekabet avantajının tedarik zinciri performansı üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca tedarik zinciri stratejilerinin tedarik zinciri performansı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımı ve rekabet avantajının aracı rolü olup olmadığı da çalışma kapsamında incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda geliştirilen model ve hipotezlerin test edilmesi için Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren et ve et ürünleri üreticilerine anket uygulaması yapılmıştır. Uygulama sonrasında 408 geçerli anket elde edilmiştir. Anket uygulaması sonucunda elde edilen veriler SPSS ve AMOS programları aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Yapısal eşitlik analizi sonucunda, yalın ve çevik tedarik zinciri stratejilerinin işletmenin müşteriler ve tedarikçilerle bilgi paylaşımı ile rekabet avantajını etkilediği görülmüştür. Müşterilerle bilgi paylaşımı sadece kaynak performansını etkilerken, tedarikçilerle bilgi paylaşımı hem üretim hem de esneklik performansını etkilemiştir. Rekabet avantajı ise kaynak, üretim ve esneklik performansı üzerinde etkili olmuştur. Aracı etkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik analiz sonuçlarında ise çevik tedarik zinciri stratejisinin kaynak performansı üzerinde müşteriler ve tedarikçilerle bilgi paylaşımının aracı rolü hariç diğer tüm aracı rollerin olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Tedarik Zinciri Stratejileri, Bilgi Paylaşımı, Rekabet Avantajı, Tedarik Zinciri Performansı

Ethical Statement

Çalışma, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Üretim ve Pazarlama Programında doktora tezi olarak sunulmuştur ve bu tezden üretilen çalışma ARÜ İİBF Dergisine gönderilmiştir. Çalışma ile ilgili etik beyanı, dergi editör kurulu tarafınca yazarlardan ve ilgili kurumdan talep edilmiştir. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü tarafından dergimize bir yazı göndermiş olup aşağıdaki ifadelere yer vermiştir. Ayrıca söz konusu belge, DergiPark sistemine yüklenmiştir. “İlgili çalışma. Prof. Dr. Dilşad GÜZEL danışmanlığında Murat KURNUÇ tarafından hazırlanmış ve Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Üretim ve Pazarlama programında 2022 yılında “Tedarik zinciri stratejilerinin tedarik zinciri performansı üzerindeki etkisinde bilgi paylaşımı ve rekabet avantajının aracı rolü" isimli doktora tezinden türetilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında uygulanan anketler için gerekli görülen kaynak gösterimleri ilgili araştırmacı tarafından yapılmış ve bu doğrultuda çalışma için etik kurul beyan belgesi istenmemiştir.”

References

• Akboğa, Ö. ve Baradan, S. (2012). İnşaat sektöründe malzeme tedarik yönetiminin önemi. Engineering Sciences, 7(1), 350-357.
• Albright, J. J. ve Park, H. M. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS, LISREL, Mplus and SAS/STAT CALIS. Technical Working Paper: Indiana University.
• Alzoubi, H. ve Yanamandra, R. (2020). Investigating the mediating role of information sharing strategy on agile supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 273-284.
• Ariadi, G., Surachman, S. ve Rohman, F. (2021). The effect of lean and agile supply chain strategy on financial performance with mediating of strategic supplier integration & strategic customer integration: evidence from bottled drinking-water industry in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1930500.
• Armistead, C. ve Mapes, J. (1993). The impact of supply chain integration on operating performance. Logistics Information Management, 6(4), 9-14.
• Baihaqi, I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2013). The impact of information sharing in supply chains on organisational performance: an empirical study. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 24(8-9), 743-758.
• Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-92.
• Berry, D. ve Naim, M. (1996). Quantifying The relative improvements of redesign strategies in A PC supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 46(4), 181-96.
• Blackstone, J. H. (2013). APICS dictionary - the essential supply chain reference. Chicago, IL: APICS.
• Bolisani, E. ve Bratianu, C. (2018). The elusive definition of knowledge. In Emergent Knowledge Strategies. Springer, Cham.
• Bruun, P. ve Mefford, R. N. (2004). Lean production and the internet. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(3), 247-260.
• Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. Internatıonal Journal of Testing, 55-86.
• Cachon, G. ve Fisher, M. (2000). Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Science, 46(8), 1032-1048.
• Cegliński, P. (2016). The concept of competitive advantages. logic, sources and durability. Journal of Positive Management, 7(3), 57-70.
• Chen, C., Gu, T., Cai, Y. ve Yang, Y. (2019). Impact of supply chain information sharing on performance of fashion enterprises: an empirical study using SEM. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(16), 913-935.
• Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B. ve Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.
• Çemberci, M. (2011). Tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansının göstergeleri ve işletme performansı üzerine etkileri: kavramsal model önerisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Kocaeli: Gebze İleri teknoloji Enstitüsü.
• Feldmann, M. ve Mrller, S. (2003). An incentive scheme for true information providing in supply chains. Omega, 31(2), 63–73.
• Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 105-116.
• Flynn, B., B. ve B., Huo (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
• Güzel, D. (2013). İmalatçı KOBİ’lerin çeviklik açısından incelenmesi: Erzurum ili örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 183-197.
• Güzel, D. ve Demirdöğen, O. (2016). Tedarik zinciri bütünleşmesi, yeşil tedarik zinciri uygulamaları ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 362-394.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Handoko, B. L., Aryanto, R. ve So, I. G. (2015). The impact of enterprise resources system and supply chain practices on competitive advantage and firm performance: case of Indonesian companies. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 122-128.
• Hatani, L., Zain, D. ve Wirjodirjo, B. (2013). The role of competitiveness as mediator for the relation between supply chain flexibility and firm performance. Journal of Management Research, 5(1), 269.
• Hooper D., Coughlan J. ve Mullen Mr. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Huang, H. H. (2002). Integrated production model in agile manufacturing systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20, 515-525.
• Huff, A. S., Floyd, S. W. ve Sherman, H. D. (2009). Strategic management: logic and action, John Wiley Sons. New York.
• Hugos, M. H. (2018). Essentials of supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.
• Jie, F., Parton, K. A. ve Cox, R. J. (2013). Linking supply chain practices to competitive advantage: an example from Australian Agribusiness”. British Food Journal, 115(7), 1003-1024.
• Kankaew, K., Yapanto, L., Waramontri, R., Arief, S., Hamsir, H., Sastrawati, N. ve Espinoza-Maguiña, M. (2021). Supply chain management and logistic presentation: mediation effect of competitive advantage. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 255-264.
• Ketchen, D. C. ve Giunipero, L. C. (2004). The intersection of strategic management and supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), 51-56.
• Kim, S. W. (2006). Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 241-248.
• Kochan, C. G. (2015). The impact of cloud-based supply chain management on supply chain resilience. (Doctoral Dissertation), Texas: University of North Texas.
• Krause, D. R. ve Handfield, R. B. (1998). T.V. scannel, an empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 39–58.
• La Londe, B. ve Ginter, J. (2004). The Ohio State University 2003 survey of career patterns in logistics.
• Lambert, D., Stock, J. R. ve Ellram, L. M. (1998). Fundamentals of logistics management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
• Lee, H. L., So, K. C. ve Tang, C. S. (2000). Value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626-643.
• Lewis, M. A. (2000). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 959-976.
• Li, G., Lin, Y., Wang, S. ve Yan, H. (2006). Enhancing agility by timely sharing of supply information. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(5), 425-435.
• Lotfi, M. ve Saghiri, S. (2018). Disentangling resilience, agility and leanness: conceptual development and empirical analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 168-197.
• Lummus, R. R. ve Vokurka, K. L. (1999). Managing the demand chain through managing the information flow: capturing moments of information. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 40(1), 15-16.
• Marinagi, C., Trivellas, P. ve Reklitis, P. (2015). Information quality and supply chain performance: the mediating role of information sharing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 473-479.
• Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D. ve Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 2001, 1-25.
• Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulaması. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Papadas, K. K., Avlonitis, G. J., Carrigan, M. ve Piha, L. (2019). The interplay of strategic and internal green marketing orientation on competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 104, 632-643.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60-78.
• Qi, Y., Boyer, K. K. ve Zhao, X. (2009). Supply chain strategy, product characteristics, and performance impact: evidence from Chinese manufacturers”. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 667-695.
• Qi, Y., Zhao, X. ve Sheu, C. (2011). The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 371-389.
• Rafaeli, S. ve Raban, D. R. (2005). Information sharing online: a research challenge. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1-2), 62-79.
• Rossel, Y. (2012). Iavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
• Ruiz-Benítez, R., López, C. ve Real, J. C. (2018). The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 190-202.
• Russell, R. ve H., Stephen (2007). Supply chain management, more than integrated logistics. Air Force Journal of Logistics, (31), 55-62.
• Sahin, F. ve Robinson Jr, E. P. (2005). Information sharing and coordination in make-to-order supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 23(6), 579-598.
• Sezen, B. (2008). Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 233-240.
• Simon (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the autonomy-preference-index (API)”. Health Expectations, 13, 234-243.
• Sohn, S. Y. ve Lim, M. (2008). The effect of forecasting and information sharing in SCM for multi-generation products. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 276-287.
• Tanyaş, M. (2006). Tedarik zinciri yönetimi ve SCOR modeli, Atılım Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.
• Thomas, D. ve Griffin, P. M. (1996). Coordinated supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1), 1–15.
• Uçak, N. Ö. (2010). Bilgi: çok yüzlü bir kavram”. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(4), 705-722.
• Van Hoek, R. I. (1999). From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 129-135.
• Wijetunge, W. A. D. S. (2017). The role of supply chain management practices in achieving organizational performance through competitive advantage in Sri Lankan SMEs. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 3(1), 81-88.
• Yang, T. M. ve Maxwell, T. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: a literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and interorganizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 164-175.
• Yılmaz, Y. ve Bitici, Y. (2006). Performance measurement in the value chain manufacturing v. tourism”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(5), 371-389.
• Yu, Z. X., Yan, H. ve Cheng, T. C. E. (2001). Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(3), 114–119.
• Zhao, X., Xie, J. ve Zhang, W. J. (2002). The impact of information sharing and order-coordination on supply chain performance”. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 24-40.
• Zuckerman, A. (2004). Supply chain management: operations. (Express Exec), Publisher: Capstone.