Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey

Year 2019, , 86 - 89, 06.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019566636

Abstract

In this study, a total of 1935 fish samples were collected monthly between June 2017 and May 2018 belonging to 5 families; Cyprinidae, Siluridae, Percidae, Centrarchidae and Esocidae from the lower Sakarya River, Turkish shores of the western Black Sea. Estimation for b value of the lengthweight relationship ranged between 2.87 (Carassius gibelio) and 3.41 (Alburnus escherichii). Length–weight estimates and TLmax value (18.2 cm) for A. escherichii are not available in Fishbase and are first given in this research. Eleven of the evaluated 13 species are commercial for the Sakarya River fishery. The results of this research could be useful for further fishery studies in the lower Sakarya River.

Supporting Institution

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Scientific Research Project Office

Project Number

17/073

Thanks

We would like to thanks to Dr. İrem KÖSE REİS, Alper ALP, Erdinç AYDIN and all fishermen for their helps.

References

  • Bobori, D. C., Moutopoulos, D. K., Bekri, M., Salvarina, I. & Munoz, A. I. P. (2010). Length-weight relationships of freshwater fish species caught in three Greek lakes. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki, 14, 219-224.
  • Ergüden, S. A. & Göksu, M. Z. L. (2009). Length-weight relationships for 12 fish species caught in Seyhan Dam Lake in southern Anatolia, Adana, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25, 501-502.
  • Erkoyuncu, I. (1995). Balıkçılık Biyolojisi ve Populasyon Dinamiği. [Fish Biology and Population Dynamics.] Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Fisheries Textbook, Sinop, pp. 265.
  • FAO. (2015). Studies and Reviews. Mediterranean Coastal Lagoons: Sustainable Management and Interactions Among Aquaculture, Capture Fisheries and the Environment. Rome, No:95. ISBN 978-92-5-108792-3
  • Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 241-253.
  • Froese, R. (1998). Length-weight relationships for 18 less-studied fish species. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 14, 117-118.
  • Geldiay, R. & Balık, S. (2009). Türkiye Tatlısu Balıkları. [Freshwater fish in Turkey.] Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries Textbook, Series:46, VI. Press, Izmir, pp 648.
  • Goncalves, J. M. S., Bentes, L., Lino, P. G., Ribeiro, J., Canario, A. V. M. & Erzini, K. (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30(3), 253-256.
  • Haimovici, M. & Velasco, G. (2000). Length weight relationship of marine fishes from southern Brazil. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 23(1), 1–5.
  • Harrison, T. D. (2001). Length-weight relationships of fishes from South African estuaries. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17(1), 46-48.
  • Kahraman, A. E., Göktürk, D. & Aydın, E. (2014). Length-Weight Relationships of Five Fish Species from the Sakarya River, Turkey. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 4 (15), 2476-2483.
  • Kalaycı, F., Samsun, N., Bilgin, S. & Samsun, O. (2007). Length Weight Relationship of 10 Fish Species Caught by Bottom Trawl and Midwater Trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 7(1), 33-36.
  • Kottelat, M. & Freyhof, J. (2007). Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Switzerland: Steven Simpson Books.
  • Kuru, M. (2004). Türkiye İçsu Balıklarının Son Sistematik Durumu. [Recent systematic status of inland water fishes of Turkey.] Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(3), 1-21.
  • Moutopoulos, D. K. & Stergiou, K. I. (2002). Length-weight and lengthlength relationships of fish species from Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18(3), 200-203.
  • Pauly, D. (1993). Fishbyte section editorial. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly, 16, 26.
  • Ricker, W. E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 191, 400p.
  • Saç, G. & Okgerman, H. (2016). Length-Weight Relationship, Length-Length Relationship and Condition Factor of Some Fish Populations in Büyükçekmece Reservoir (İstanbul, Turkey). Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 2(1), 43-48.
  • Shiklomanov, I. A. (1999). World water resources and their use. St. Petersburg, Russia: State Hydrological Institute/UNESCO.
  • Tarkan, A. S., Gaygusuz, Ö., Acıpınar, H., Gürsoy, Ç. & Özuluğ, M. (2006). Length-weight relationship of fishes from the Marmara region (NWTurkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 271-273.
  • Teixeira, E. C., Silva, V. E. L., Fabré, N. N. & Batista, V. S. (2017). Length–weight relationships for four stingray species from the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 33(3), 594-596.
  • Torcu Koç, H., Aka, Z. & Treer, T. (2006). A review of length-weight relationships of fishes from freshwaters of Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 264-270.
  • Tsoumani, M., Liasko, R., Moutsaki,, P., Kagalou, I. & Leonardos, I. (2006). Length-weight relationships of an invasivecyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakesin relation to their trophic states. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 281-284.
Year 2019, , 86 - 89, 06.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019566636

Abstract

Project Number

17/073

References

  • Bobori, D. C., Moutopoulos, D. K., Bekri, M., Salvarina, I. & Munoz, A. I. P. (2010). Length-weight relationships of freshwater fish species caught in three Greek lakes. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki, 14, 219-224.
  • Ergüden, S. A. & Göksu, M. Z. L. (2009). Length-weight relationships for 12 fish species caught in Seyhan Dam Lake in southern Anatolia, Adana, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25, 501-502.
  • Erkoyuncu, I. (1995). Balıkçılık Biyolojisi ve Populasyon Dinamiği. [Fish Biology and Population Dynamics.] Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Fisheries Textbook, Sinop, pp. 265.
  • FAO. (2015). Studies and Reviews. Mediterranean Coastal Lagoons: Sustainable Management and Interactions Among Aquaculture, Capture Fisheries and the Environment. Rome, No:95. ISBN 978-92-5-108792-3
  • Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 241-253.
  • Froese, R. (1998). Length-weight relationships for 18 less-studied fish species. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 14, 117-118.
  • Geldiay, R. & Balık, S. (2009). Türkiye Tatlısu Balıkları. [Freshwater fish in Turkey.] Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries Textbook, Series:46, VI. Press, Izmir, pp 648.
  • Goncalves, J. M. S., Bentes, L., Lino, P. G., Ribeiro, J., Canario, A. V. M. & Erzini, K. (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30(3), 253-256.
  • Haimovici, M. & Velasco, G. (2000). Length weight relationship of marine fishes from southern Brazil. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 23(1), 1–5.
  • Harrison, T. D. (2001). Length-weight relationships of fishes from South African estuaries. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17(1), 46-48.
  • Kahraman, A. E., Göktürk, D. & Aydın, E. (2014). Length-Weight Relationships of Five Fish Species from the Sakarya River, Turkey. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 4 (15), 2476-2483.
  • Kalaycı, F., Samsun, N., Bilgin, S. & Samsun, O. (2007). Length Weight Relationship of 10 Fish Species Caught by Bottom Trawl and Midwater Trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 7(1), 33-36.
  • Kottelat, M. & Freyhof, J. (2007). Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Switzerland: Steven Simpson Books.
  • Kuru, M. (2004). Türkiye İçsu Balıklarının Son Sistematik Durumu. [Recent systematic status of inland water fishes of Turkey.] Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(3), 1-21.
  • Moutopoulos, D. K. & Stergiou, K. I. (2002). Length-weight and lengthlength relationships of fish species from Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18(3), 200-203.
  • Pauly, D. (1993). Fishbyte section editorial. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly, 16, 26.
  • Ricker, W. E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 191, 400p.
  • Saç, G. & Okgerman, H. (2016). Length-Weight Relationship, Length-Length Relationship and Condition Factor of Some Fish Populations in Büyükçekmece Reservoir (İstanbul, Turkey). Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 2(1), 43-48.
  • Shiklomanov, I. A. (1999). World water resources and their use. St. Petersburg, Russia: State Hydrological Institute/UNESCO.
  • Tarkan, A. S., Gaygusuz, Ö., Acıpınar, H., Gürsoy, Ç. & Özuluğ, M. (2006). Length-weight relationship of fishes from the Marmara region (NWTurkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 271-273.
  • Teixeira, E. C., Silva, V. E. L., Fabré, N. N. & Batista, V. S. (2017). Length–weight relationships for four stingray species from the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 33(3), 594-596.
  • Torcu Koç, H., Aka, Z. & Treer, T. (2006). A review of length-weight relationships of fishes from freshwaters of Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 264-270.
  • Tsoumani, M., Liasko, R., Moutsaki,, P., Kagalou, I. & Leonardos, I. (2006). Length-weight relationships of an invasivecyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakesin relation to their trophic states. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(4), 281-284.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

İsmail Reis 0000-0003-4599-6780

Hasan Cerim This is me 0000-0003-3025-1444

Celal Ateş This is me 0000-0002-7336-0387

Project Number 17/073
Publication Date September 6, 2019
Submission Date May 16, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Reis, İ., Cerim, H., & Ateş, C. (2019). Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(3), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019566636
AMA Reis İ, Cerim H, Ateş C. Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Aqua Sci Eng. September 2019;34(3):86-89. doi:10.26650/ASE2019566636
Chicago Reis, İsmail, Hasan Cerim, and Celal Ateş. “Length-Weight Relationship of 13 Fish Species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 34, no. 3 (September 2019): 86-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019566636.
EndNote Reis İ, Cerim H, Ateş C (September 1, 2019) Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 34 3 86–89.
IEEE İ. Reis, H. Cerim, and C. Ateş, “Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey”, Aqua Sci Eng, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 86–89, 2019, doi: 10.26650/ASE2019566636.
ISNAD Reis, İsmail et al. “Length-Weight Relationship of 13 Fish Species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 34/3 (September 2019), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019566636.
JAMA Reis İ, Cerim H, Ateş C. Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Aqua Sci Eng. 2019;34:86–89.
MLA Reis, İsmail et al. “Length-Weight Relationship of 13 Fish Species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, vol. 34, no. 3, 2019, pp. 86-89, doi:10.26650/ASE2019566636.
Vancouver Reis İ, Cerim H, Ateş C. Length-Weight relationship of 13 fish species from the Lower Sakarya River, Turkey. Aqua Sci Eng. 2019;34(3):86-9.

openaccess.jpgOpen Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.