Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?

Ulaş Başar Gezgin; Fatma Yıldırım

Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?

Abstract

Just like the case in any other power centers of the world, such as U.S., Europe and Russia, big data in China have information-wise polarized the researchers. On the one hand, some have been excited about the opportunities big data will bring to scientific research (e.g. new discoveries already made in medical research); on the other, some others are worried about increased level of privacy violations. Possibly because of the difficulties in self-expression within the political context of China, other more detailed objections to the use of big data by governments and corporations are rarely discussed with regard to China. While Chinese government implements the social credit system which is based on the big data of each citizen collected by any surveillance device –unethical ones included, so far this system has not been discussed extensively within academic circles. However, such a system can be a model for other countries and become a global nightmare rather than a Chinese one only. This social credit system is closely related with the notion of Internet of Things which appears to be benign at first blush, but has the potential for misuse and abuse in the hands of authoritarian governments and greedy corporations. The lines between public and private will be blurred by the advent of Internet of Things which will make any electronic device capable of transferring data to the Big Brother.

In this article, big data discussions, both pros and cons are presented and other themes that are understudied in China are also listed.

Keywords

Big data,Big data in China,Big brother,Surveillance,Data distortion,Data manipulation

References

Adame, B. J. (2016). Training in the mitigation of anchoring bias: A test of the consider-the-opposite strategy. Learning and Motivation, 53, 36-48.
Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 2053951715594634.
Begue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 435-463.
Berghel, H. (2018). Malice Domestic: The Cambridge Analytica Dystopia. Computer, 5, 84-89.
Berthelot, J. M., Nizard, J., & Maugars, Y. (2018). The Negative Hawthorne Effect: Explaining Pain Overexpression. Joint Bone Spine. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.003
Berwick, A. (2018). How ZTE helps Venezuela create China-style social control.
Reuters, 14.11.2018. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/venezuela-zte/
Bissell, K., & Parrott, S. (2013). Prejudice: The role of the media in the development of social bias. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 15(4), 219-270.

Botsman, R. (2017). Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens. Wired UK, 21.10.2017. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
Buraschi, D., Bustillos, A., & Huici, C. (2018). Attitudes toward Immigrants, Beliefs about Causes of Poverty and Effects of Perspective-Taking. The Spanish journal of psychology, 21.
Cao, X., & Wang, Y. (2016). An Approach to Granting Subsidies to College Students in China Using Big Data. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 1-4.
Chagnon, N. J. (2017). Racialized Culpability: Victim Blaming and State Violence. In Race, Ethnicity and Law (pp. 199-219). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Chen, L. F., Vander Weg, M. W., Hofmann, D. A., & Reisinger, H. S. (2015). The Hawthorne effect in infection prevention and epidemiology. infection control & hospital epidemiology, 36(12), 1444-1450.
D’Ariano, G. M. (2003). On the Heisenberg principle, namely on the information‐disturbance trade‐off in a quantum measurement. Fortschritte der Physik: Progress of Physics, 51(4‐5), 318-330.
Dunleavy, D. (2015). Data visualization and infographics. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 68-68.
Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. new media & society, 14(1), 45-62.
Feng, G., & China, O. D. (2015). Open data: concepts, status and opportunities. Big Data Research, (2), 2.
Fernando, W. D. A. (2018). Exploring character in the new capitalism: a study of mid-level academics’ in a British research-intensive university. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1045-1057.
Fitzi, G., & Mele, V. (2017). The corrosion of character: Work and personality in the modern age. Journal of Classical Sociology, 17(2), 143-155.
Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and individual differences, 34(5), 795-817.
Gentile, B., Twenge, J. M., Freeman, E. C., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). The effect of social networking websites on positive self-views: An experimental investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1929-1933.
Gezgin, U. B. (2018). An invitation to critical social science of big data: from critical theory and critical research to omniresistance. AI & SOCIETY, 1-9.doi: 10.1007/s00146-018-0868-y
Godfrey, E. B., & Wolf, S. (2016). Developing critical consciousness or justifying the system? A qualitative analysis of attributions for poverty and wealth among low-income racial/ethnic minority and immigrant women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(1), 93-103.
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(1-2), 79-83.
Goodman, S., & Carr, P. (2017). The just world hypothesis as an argumentative resource in debates about unemployment benefits. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 312-323.
Guowei, W. (2009). A Tentative Discussion on Establishing Social Credit System in China. Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University, (6), 34. ttp://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SXGB200906034.htm
Hai-yan, W. A. N. G. (2010). A Legal & Economic Analysis on Social Credit Crisis in China. Credit Reference, (6), 5.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HNJG201006005.htm
Hirst, M. (2014). “Big Data” Is Creating a Surveillance Economy. Issues magazine, 109, 19-21.
Hodson, H. (2015). Big brother is rating you (if you’re Chinese). New Scientist, 228(3043), 22–23. doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(15)31412-3
Howard, A., & Borenstein, J. (2018). The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: the problem of bias and social inequity. Science and engineering ethics, 24(5), 1521-1536.
Huang, J. X., & Wu, Y. (2002). Some problems in establishment of social credit system in China [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 3.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HRBG200203014.htm
Huang, X. (2018, August). Research on the Legal Protection of Personal Information in China in the Environment of Big Data. In 3rd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and Economic Subjects (JAHP 2018). Atlantis Press.
https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/25902184.pdf
Huogen, W. (2013). The Development Trend and Its System Construction of Social Credit in China [J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 7.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CQSK201307008.htm
Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection. Computer, 51(8), 56-59.
Joh, E. E. (2016). The new surveillance discretion: Automated suspicion, big data, and policing. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 10, 15-42.
Jun-yue, L. I. N. (2011). Social Credit System: China′ s Model for Efficiently
Establishing Credit Reference System [J]. Credit Reference, 2. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HNJG201102002.htm
LaBrie, R. C., Steinke, G. H., Li, X., & Cazier, J. A. (2018). Big data analytics sentiment: US-China reaction to data collection by business and government. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, 45-55.
Lammers, J., & Burgmer, P. (2018). Power increases the self‐serving bias in the attribution of collective successes and failures. European Journal of Social Psychology.
Laterza, V. (2018). Cambridge Analytica, independent research and the national interest. Anthropology Today, 34(3), 1-2.
Li, N., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Wilson, P. H., & Rose, K. M. (2018). Communicating data: interactive infographics, scientific data and credibility. Journal of Science Communication, 17(2), A06.
Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., Huys, Q. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2018). The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(1), 322-349.
Loubere, N., & Brehm, S. (2018). The Global Age of Algorithm: Social Credit and the Financialisation of Governance in China. Made in China: A Quarterly on Chinese Labour, Civil Society, and Rights, 3(1), 38-43.
Martin, E. (1981). A twist on the heisenberg principle: Or, how crime affects its measurement. Social Indicators Research, 9(2), 197-223.
Mei, H. (2008). Establishing Efficient Social Credit System in China from European Experience of Social Credit System/ Etablissement du Systeme de Credit Social Efficace en Chine d’apres les Experiences du Systeme de Credit Social Europeen. Canadian Social Science, 4(1), 1-3.
Miller, K. (2014). Total surveillance, big data, and predictive crime technology: Privacy’s perfect storm. Journal of Technology of Law & Policy, 19, 105- 146.
Moosa, I. A., & Ramiah, V. (2017). Overconfidence and Self-Serving Bias. In The Financial Consequences of Behavioural Biases (pp. 45-69). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
O’Connor, P., & Crome, K. (2016). Learning together: Foucault, Sennett and the crisis of the co-operative character. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 49(2), 30-42.
Otten, J. J., Cheng, K., & Drewnowski, A. (2015). Infographics and public policy: using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Affairs, 34(11), 1901-1907.
Paterson, P. (2008). The Truth About Tonkin. Naval History Magazine, 22(1), np. https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2008/february/truth-about-tonkin
Proverbio, A. M., La Mastra, F., & Zani, A. (2016). How negative social bias affects memory for faces: An electrical neuroimaging study. PloS One, 11(9), e0162671.
Rosenberg, M., Pettifor, A., Twine, R., Hughes, J. P., Gomez-Olive, F. X., Wagner, R. G., Sulaimon, A., Tollman, S., Selin, A., MacPhail, C. & Kahn, K. (2018). Evidence for sample selection effect and Hawthorne effect in behavioural HIV prevention trial among young women in a rural South African community. BMJ Open, 8(1), e019167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019167
Ruijer, E. H., & Martinius, E. (2017). Researching the democratic impact of open, government data: A systematic literature review. Information Polity, 22(4), 233-250.
Saran, R., Steffick, D., & Bragg-Gresham, J. (2017). The China Kidney Disease Network (CK-NET):“Big Data—Big Dreams”. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 69(6), 713-716.
Schwartz B (2012) Rethinking conflict and collective memory. The case of Nanking. In J. Alexander, R. Jacobs and P. Smith (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 529–563.
Sedgwick, P., & Greenwood, N. (2015). Understanding the Hawthorne effect. Bmj, 351, h4672.
Sennett R (2001) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
Sposito, G. (1969). IV. Does a generalized Heisenberg principle operate in the social sciences?. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 12(1- 4), 356-361.
Tao, Y., & Mengwei, Y. (2014). The internal operating mechanism of the construction of social credit system in contemporary China. Theory and Modernization, 1(1).
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-LYXD201401001.htm
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538-2557.
Wang, X. J., & Li, S. T. (2011). Thoughts on Construction of Social Credit System in Liaoning Province, China. Credit Reference, (1), 19.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HNJG201101019.htm
Wang, Z. (2009). Old wounds, new narratives: Joint history textbook writing and peacebuilding in East Asia. History & Memory, 21(1), 101-126.
Wei, Z., & Jing, C. (2012). The Collaborative Governance: The Selected Mode of Social Credit System in China [J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 11.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-NJSH201211017.htm
Xiao-fan, Z. (2005). Construction of Social Credit Reporting System: International Comparison and Domestic Study——on Integration of Personal Credit Reporting and Firm Credit Reporting of China [J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CLSJ200502021.htm
Xi-qin, W. (2005). Social Credit Structure and Improvement of Social Credit Environment in China. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, (2), 12.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-WHKS200502012.htm
Xin, J. (2007). Establishing Efficient Social Credit System in China from American Experience of Social Credit System/Etablissement d’un Système Efficace de Crédit Social en Chine d’après les Expériences Américaines. Canadian Social Science, 3(6), 64.
Xu, X., & Spillman, L. (2010). Political centres, progressive narratives and cultural trauma: Coming to terms with the Nanjing Massacre in China, 1937– 1979. In Northeast
Asia’s Difficult Past (pp. 101-128). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Yang-ping, H. (2007). “ Three-layer Theories”: The Path Choice of Social Credit System Construction in China. Journal of Jimei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (3), 10.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-JMDZ200703010.htm
Yong, H. (2012). Countermeasures for Improving Social Credit Reference System of Individual Credit in China. Credit Reference, (5), 16.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HNJG201205016.htm
Yu-xia, X. (2012). Thoughts about Strengthening Construction of Social Credit System in China. Credit Reference, (2), 13.
http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HNJG201202013.htm
Zhang, L., Wang, H., Li, Q., Zhao, M. H., & Zhan, Q. M. (2018). Big data and medical research in China. bmj, 360, j5910.
Zhang, S. (2015). Big Data for Healthcare in China: a Review of the State-of-art. Cambridge Journal of China Studies, 10(1), 32-40.
Zhang, Y., Pan, Z., Li, K., & Guo, Y. (2018). Self-Serving Bias in Memories. Experimental psychology.
Zhang, Z. (2014). Big data and clinical research: focusing on the area of critical care medicine in mainland China. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 4(5), 426-429.
Zhang, Z. (2017). Release of the national healthcare big data in China: a historic leap in clinical research. AME Medical Journal, 2(19).
Zhao, H., & Dong, H. (2017). Research on personal privacy protection of China in the era of big data. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 139-145.
Zhao, W. L., & Feng, X. F. (2002). Current Situation and Improvement of Social Credit in the Transition Period of China. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), (2), 22. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/ CJFDTOTAL-XAJD200202022.htm
Zinn, H. (2015). A people’s history of the United States: 1492-present. Routledge.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ulaş Başar Gezgin

Fatma Yıldırım

Publication Date

June 1, 2019

Submission Date

March 1, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 1, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 3 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gezgin, U. B., & Yıldırım, F. (2019). Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 101-120. https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST

AMA

1.Gezgin UB, Yıldırım F. Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019;3(1):101-120. https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST

Chicago

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar, and Fatma Yıldırım. 2019. “Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3 (1): 101-20. https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST.

EndNote

Gezgin UB, Yıldırım F (June 1, 2019) Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3 1 101–120.

IEEE

[1]U. B. Gezgin and F. Yıldırım, “Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?”, Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 101–120, June 2019, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST

ISNAD

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar - Yıldırım, Fatma. “Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3/1 (June 1, 2019): 101-120. https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST.

JAMA

1.Gezgin UB, Yıldırım F. Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019;3:101–120.

MLA

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar, and Fatma Yıldırım. “Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both?”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, June 2019, pp. 101-20, https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST.

Vancouver

1.Ulaş Başar Gezgin, Fatma Yıldırım. Big Data in China: Bigger Problems, Easier Solutions or Both? Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 1;3(1):101-20. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA33WD38ST