OSMANLI CÜLUS MİNYATÜRLERİNDE PADİŞAH İMGESİNİN SANATÇI ALGISI VE ÜSLUP ÖZELLİKLERİNE YANSIMASI

Volume: 0 Number: 33 June 9, 2015
EN TR

-

Abstract

The enthronement, that means ascending the throne of crown prince in Ottoman Empire, has gained importance because of preventing the fight for the throne in state and as formal way of obeying the crown prince ascending the throne. In Turkısh people, who have a rooted state tradition, accession to the throne had been performed with a ceremony and continued as an honorific expression to management and state in future. At the same time, these ceremonies have meant the presentation of loyalty and respect to the head, so the enthronements made in Ottoman Period have subjected to many miniatures and historical manuscripts as well as those in ŞEHNAMES. Especially the stylistic features, period identification, public perception, management perception, miniature mentality at that period and conditions of artists’ reflection of stylistic features (possibilities along with artistic perceptions) seen in miniatures are about to the ceremonies of accession to the throne, including those in ŞEHNAMES. These are the primary sources of this study. In this research, stylistic features of miniatures, taking part in enthronement ceremonies, will be analyzed, and the reasons of differences and divisions are examined. It has been aimed to shed light to those specific studies in the field such as enthronement ceremonies, authority, public perception, emperor perception and art perception have been existed together, on the basis of miniatures

Keywords

References

  1. And, M. (2004). Osmanlı Tasvir Sanatları. İstanbul: Yayınevi
  2. Budak, R. (t.y); “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Beyat Merasimi”, Erişim Tarihi: 08/12/2014, www.akademiktarih.com/
  3. Duran, T. (1999). Padişah Portreleri. İstanbul: Yayınevi
  4. Ertuğ, Z, T. (1999). XVI. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Devleti'nde Cülus ve Cenaze Törenleri. İstanbul
  5. Ertuğ, Z, T.(1998). “Hünername”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam
  6. Ansiklopedisi. (c.7,s.485) İstanbul. Fetvacı, E. (1990). Sarayın İmgeleri-Osmanlı Sarayının Gözüyle Resimli
  7. Tarih. İstanbul: Yayınevi Hattstein, M. Delius, P. (2007). İslam Sanatı ve Mimarisi. İstanbul: Yayınevi
  8. Mahir, B.(2005). Osmanlı Minyatür Sanatı İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi

Details

Primary Language

tr;en

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Cihan İnanç This is me

Publication Date

June 9, 2015

Submission Date

June 9, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 0 Number: 33

APA
Gökdaş, Y., & İnanç, C. (2015). OSMANLI CÜLUS MİNYATÜRLERİNDE PADİŞAH İMGESİNİN SANATÇI ALGISI VE ÜSLUP ÖZELLİKLERİNE YANSIMASI. Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33, 109-149. https://izlik.org/JA86LW87RY

Obtaining permissions for studies requiring ethics committee approval regarding the implementation of ethical rules and including information about permission in the article was added to the criteria. In this direction, Ethics Committee Permission is required for articles submitted to our journal and meeting the conditions stated below.
• Any research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using questionnaires, interviews, focus group work, observation, experimentation, and interview techniques.
Also;
• Obtaining and indicating permission from the owners for the use of scales, surveys and photographs belonging to others,
• It should be stated that the copyright regulations are complied with for the intellectual and artistic works used.