INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE AIR TRAFFIC ROUTE CONFIGURATIONS ON SECTOR CAPACITY

Abstract

Airspace constraints and controller workload are among the limiting factors of airspace capacity. One of these constraints is the network structure of Air Traffic Services (ATS) routes which is related to the configuration of flight paths, the presence of intersecting routes or conflict points, and the intersection angle. Improved sector capacity can be achieved through air route network development which limits the number of conflicts involving major traffic flows. In order to reduce the number of conflicts, the route configurations can be changed and merged in a single point. In this direction, two different models have been developed through fast time simulation to measure the effect of intersection of the unidirectional flight paths at three different points and one point on the sector capacity. Under the specified conditions, it is observed that the three intersecting routes at one point increased the average delay time by 15.9 min. and decreased the capacity by 20% according to the three intersecting routes at three different points. As a result of the study, it is concluded that the route configurations are one of the important factors affecting the average delay and sector capacity.

Keywords

• Intersecting routes,sector capacity

References

1. Majumdara A, Ochienga WY, Benthamb J, Richards M. En-route sector capacity estimation methodologies: An international survey. Journal of Air Transport Management 2005; 11: 375–387.
2. EUROCONTROL. European Route Network Improvement Plan - European Airspace Design Methodology Guidelines. Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL, 2016.
3. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Air Traffic Services Planning Manual (Doc 9426). Montreal, Canada: ICAO, 1984.
4. Baric D, Pilko H, Strujic J. An analytic hierarchy process model to evaluate road section design. Transport 2016; 31 (3): 312-321.
5. Chang I, Ahn SY, Hahn JS. Analysis of delay reduction effects on modern roundabouts according to the entry traffic volume. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering 2013; 17(7): 1782-1787.
6. Hassannejad H, Medici P, Cardarelli E, Cerri P. Detection of moving objects in roundabouts based on a monocular system. Expert Systems with Applications 2015; 42: 4167-4176.
7. Huang SM, Feron E, Reed G, Mao ZH. Compact configuration of aircraft flows at intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2014; 15 (2): 771-783.
8. Treleaven K, Mao ZH. Conflict resolution and traffic complexity of multiple intersecting flows of aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2008; 9(4): 633-643.

9. Ramamoorthy K, Crassidis JL, Singh T. Potential functions for en-route air traffic management and flight planning. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit; 16-19 August 2004; Providence, Rhode Island, USA: AIAA. pp. 1-12.
10. Chatterji GB, Sridhar B. Measures for air traffıc controller workload prediction. In: 1st AIAA Aircraft, Technology, Integration, and Operations Forum; 16-18 October 2001; Los Angeles, USA: AIAA.
11. Wang C, Zhang X, Xu X. Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD. In: International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design; 17-18 October 2008; Tansunlake Holiday Village Wuhan, China: IEEE. pp. 87-90.
12. Li X, Chen XQ, Li DB, Wei DX. Simulation study on runway threshold stagger and utilization pattern of closely spaced parallel runways. In: International Conference on Electromechanical Control Technology and Transportation; 31 October-1 November 2015; Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China: Atlantis Press. pp. 254-259.
13. Dmochowski PA, Skorupski J. Air traffic smoothness as a universal measure for air traffic quality assessment. Procedia Engineering 2016; 134: 237-244.
14. Lai CF, Zelinski S. Simplified dynamic density based capacity estimation. In: IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference; 25-29 October 2009; Orlando, USA: IEEE. pp. 483-492.
15. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Manual on Airspace Planning Methodology for the Determination of Separation Minima (Doc 9689). Montreal, Canada: ICAO, 1998.
16. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Procedures for Air Navigation Services Air Traffic Management (Doc 4444). Montreal, Canada: ICAO, 2007.
17. Majumdar A, Ochieng WY, McAuley G, Lenzi JM, Lepadatu C. The factors affecting airspace capacity in Europe: A cross-sectional time-series analysis using simulated controller workload data. Journal of Navigation 2004; 57: 385-405.
18. General Directorate Of State Airports Authority (DHMİ). ENR 1.6 Radar air traffic control services. Ankara, Turkey: Aeronautical Information Publication (IAP), 2016.