Analysis of Forensic Accounting Research by Bibliometric Network Mapping Method

Abstract

This study analyzes the bibliometric characteristics of forensic accounting research indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database for the period of 1982-2024. Using VOSviewer software, the study examines publication and citation trends, dominant research areas, and prominent keywords. Furthermore, it conducts network analyses to map bibliographic coupling between authors and sources, as well as the co-citation networks of authors, sources, and references. The findings indicate a rising trend in publications and citations over the last fifteen years. The most frequently used keyword is 'forensic accounting'. The dominant research area within forensic accounting field is business economics. Co-citation analysis identifies The Accounting Review as the most influential journal. In the bibliographic coupling analysis, the Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting is the most central publication. The author analysis identifies Alshurafat, Rezaee, and DiGabriele as the most foundational scholars via co-citation and Alshurafat, Beattie, Jones, and Sands as key researchers shaping current intellectual conversations via bibliographic coupling.

Keywords

• Forensic Accounting Research
• Fraud Detection
• WoS Database
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Network Mapping

Adli Muhasebe Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Ağ Haritalama Yöntemiyle Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Web of Science veri tabanında indekslenen adli muhasebe çalışmalarının bibliyometrik özelliklerini analiz etmektir. Araştırma 1982-2024 yılları arasını kapsamaktadır. Araştırmada, adli muhasebe çalışmalarının yıllara göre yayın ve atıf sayıları, en etkili araştırma alanları, en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler, kaynaklar ve yazarlar arasındaki bibliyografik bağlantılar ile yazarların, kaynakların ve referansların ortak atıf durumu incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya göre, çalışmalar son on beş yılda artan bir yayın ve atıf eğilimi göstermektedir. En sık kullanılan anahtar kelime adli muhasebedir. Adli muhasebe çalışmaları için en etkili araştırma alanı işletme ekonomisidir. Kaynakların ortak atıf analizinde en güçlü dergi Accounting Review ve kaynakların bibliyografik eşleşme bağlantısı açısından en güçlü dergi Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting’tir. Yazarların bibliyografik eşleşme analizi sonuçlarına göre, Alshurafat, Beattie, Jones ve Sands; Ortak atıf analizinin sonuçlarına göre, Alshurafat, Rezaee ve DiGabriele adli muhasebe alanına en yüksek entelektüel katkıyı yapan yazarlardır.

Keywords

• Adli Muhasebe Araştırmaları
• Hile Denetimi
• WoS Veri Tabanı
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Ağ Haritalama

References

1. Açık, S. (2016). Analysing the activity area and educational dimension of forensic accountancy profession. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(3), 1071-1090.
2. Akinbowale, O. E., Klingelhöfer, H. E., ve Zerihun, M. F. (2020). An innovative approach in combating economic crime using forensic accounting techniques. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1253-1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2020-0053
3. Alshurafat, H., Beattie, C., Jones, G., ve Sands, J. (2019). Forensic accounting core and interdisciplinary curricula components in Australian Universities: Analysis of websites. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 11(2), 353-365.
4. Alshurafat, H., Beattie, C., Jones, G., ve Sands, J. (2020). Perceptions of the usefulness of various teaching methods in forensic accounting education. Accounting Education, 29(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1719425
5. Altınay, M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of national articles about forensic accounting (2000-2021). International Journal of Business Economics and Management Perspectives, 5(1), 213-234.
6. Amani, F. A., ve Fadlalla, A. M. (2017). Data mining applications in accounting: A review of the literature and organizing framework. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 24, 32-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.12.004
7. Artsın, M. (2020). A text mining application: Vosviewer. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology, 8(2), 344-354.
8. Beneish, M. D., Lee, C. M. C., ve Nichols, D. C. (2013). Earnings manipulation and expected returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(2), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v69.n2.1

9. Botes, V., ve Saadeh, A. (2018). Exploring evidence to develop a nomenclature for forensic accounting. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-12-2016-0117
10. Bierstaker, J. L., Brody, R. G., ve Pacini, C. (2006). Accountants' perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610667283
11. Bressler, L. (2012). TCarpenter, T. D., Durtschi, C., ve Gaynor, L. M. (2011). The incremental benefits of a forensic accounting course on skepticism and fraud-related judgments. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(1), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1223662
12. Choo, F., ve Tan, K. (2007). An “American dream” theory of corporate executive fraud. Accounting Forum, 31(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.12.004
13. Çevik, Z. (2022). Bibliyometrik araştırmalarda analiz tekniklerinin uygulanması: Vosviewer paket programı. In O. Öztürk, G. & G. Gürler (Eds.) Bir literatür inceleme aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz (pp.125-212). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
14. DiGabriele, J. A. (2008). An empirical investigation of the relevant skills of forensic accountants. Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.6.331-338
15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., ve Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 285–296.
16. Durmaz, Ş., Çivilidağ, A., ve Işık, M. (2023). Analysis of the studies on green jobs by bibliometric analysis method. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 688-713. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf. 1220252
17. Enofe, A. O., Okpako, P. O., ve Atube, E. N. (2013). The Impact of forensic accounting on fraud detection. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(26), 61-73.
18. Evazzadeh, H., ve Ramazani, M. (2012). Accountant’s perception of forensic accounting (Case study of Iran). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(6), 1-4.
19. Free, C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: A review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2015-0009
20. he role of forensic accountants in fraud investigations: Importance of attorney and judge's perceptions. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 9 (April), 1-9.
21. Bozkurt, N. (2000). Muhasebe ve denetim mesleğinde yeni bir alan “adli muhasebecilik”. Yaklaşım Dergisi, 94, 56-61.
22. Free, C., ve Murhpy, P. R. (2015). The ties that bind: the decision to co-offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 18-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12063
23. Gong, R., Xue, J., Zhao, L., Zolotova, O., Ji, X., ve Xu, Y. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of green supply chain management based on the web of science (WOS) platform. Sustainability, 11, 3459.
24. Gürler, G. (2022). Bibliyometrik araştırmalarda ilgili literatüre ilişkin veri setinin oluşturulma süreci. In O. Öztürk, G. & G. Gürler (Eds.) Bir literatür inceleme aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz (pp.53-66). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
25. Heitger, L. E., ve Heitger, D. L. (2008). Incorporating forensic accounting and litigation advisory services into the classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2008.23.4.561
26. Howieson, B. (2018). What is the ‘good’ forensic accountant? A virtue ethics perspective. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-01-2017-0005
27. Kamwani, S. S., Vieira, E., Madaleno, M., ve Azevedo, G. (2022). Significance of forensic accounting techniques in corporate governance: Bibliometric analysis. In E.S. Vieira, G. Azevedo, M. Madaleno, S.S. Kamwani (Eds.) Handbook of research on the significance of forensic accounting techniques in corporate governance (pp.22-40). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
28. Karacan, S. (2012). Intersection of law and accounting: forensic accounting. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 4(8), 105- 128.
29. Keleş, D., ve Keleş, Ü. (2014). Forensic accountancy profession and applications in Turkey. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 5(9), 53-75.
30. Kiflee, A. K. R., Hasbullah, N. N., ve Shaharuddin, S. (2022). Forensic accounting growth: Bibliometric analysis perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 341 – 357
31. Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161-187.
32. Lis, A. (2018). Keywords co-occurrence analysis of research on sustainable enterprise and sustainable organisation. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 5(2), 47-66.
33. Mitric, M., Stankovic, A., ve Lakicevic, A. (2012). Forensic accounting: The missing link in education and practice. Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 65, 41- 50.
34. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., ve Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 339(7716), 332–336.
35. Nasrallah, N. H., Khoury, R. E., ve Harb. E. (2022). Forensic accounting in a digital environment. In E.S. Vieira, G. Azevedo, M. Madaleno, S.S. Kamwani (Eds.) Handbook of research on the significance of forensic accounting techniques in corporate governance (pp.128-149). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
36. Nunn, L., McGuire, B. L., Whitcomb, C., ve Jost, E. (2006). Forensic accountants: financial investigators. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 4(2), 1-6.
37. Okoye, E. I., ve Akamobi, N. L. (2009). The role of forensic accounting in fraud investigation and litigation support. The Nigerian Academic Forum, 17(1), 39-44.
38. Özcan, A. (2019). Analyzing the impact of forensic accounting on the detection of financial information manipulation. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 1744-1760
39. Pearson, T., ve Singleton, T. W. (2008). Fraud and forensic accounting in the digital environment. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), https://doi.org/10.2308/iace. 2008.23.4.545
40. Peloubet, M. E. (1946). Forensic accounting its place in today’s economy. Journal of Accountancy, 81(6), 458- 462.
41. Poje, T., ve Groff, M. Z. (2022). Mapping ethics education in accounting research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 451-472 https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10551-021-04846-9
42. Ramamoorti, S. (2008). The psychology and sociology of fraud: Integrating the behavioral sciences component into fraud and forensic accounting curricula. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2008.23.4. 521
43. Ramaswamy, V. (2007). New frontiers: Training forensic accountants within the accounting program, Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4 (9), 31-38.
44. Rezaee, Z., Lander, G. H., ve Reinstein, A. (1992). Forensic accounting: Challenges and opportunities, The Ohio CPA Journal (August), 20-25.
45. Rezaee, Z., Crumbley, D. L., ve Elmore, R. (2004). Forensic accounting education: A survey of academics and practitioners. Advances in Accounting Education, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=518263 Rezaee, Z., Ha, M., ve Lo, D. (2014). China needs forensic accounting education. Open Journal of Social Sciences,2, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.25103
46. Rezaee, Z., ve Wang, J. (2019). Relevance of big data to forensic accounting practice and education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34 (3), 268-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2017-1633
47. Renzhou, D. (2011). Research on legal procedural functions of forensic accounting. Energy Procedia, 5, 2147– 2151.
48. Selimoğlu, S. K., ve Altunel, M. (2020). Forensic accounting and fraud audit in Turkey (2008–2018): An academic literature review and classification. In S. Grima, E. Boztepe, Baldacchino, E. (Eds.) Contemporary issues in audit management and forensic accounting (Contemporary studies in economic and financial analysis,Vol. 102), (pp.219-244), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569- 375920200000102017
49. Shiau, W., Wang, X., ve Zheng, F. (2023). What are the trend and core knowledge of information security? A citation and co-citation analysis. Information & Management, 60(3), 103774.
50. Shiau, W., Dwivedi, Y. K., ve Yang, H. S. (2017). Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks. International Journal of Information Management, 37 (5), 390-399.
51. Singh, B. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of behavioral finance and behavioral accounting. American Business Review, 24(2), 198-230. https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.24.2.198-230
52. Song, Y., Lei, L., Wu, L., ve Chen, S. (2023). Studying domain structure: A comparative analysis of bibliographic coupling analysis and co-citation analysis considering all authors. Online Information Review, 47(1),123- 137. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2020-0540.
53. Song, Y., Wu, L., ve Ma, F. (2021). A study of differences between all-author bibliographic coupling analysis and all-author co-citation analysis in detecting the intellectual structure of a discipline. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Acalib.2021.102351.
54. Telpner, Z., ve Mostek, M. (2002). Expert witnessing in forensic accounting: A handbook for lawyers and accountants, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA
55. Van Akkeren, J., Sherrena, B., ve MacKenzie, K. (2013). A metamorphosis of the traditional accountant: An insight into forensic accounting services in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(2), 188-216.
56. White, H. D., ve Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.
57. Wolfe, D. T., ve Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38-42.
58. Yalçın, H. (2022). Adli muhasebenin tarihsel gelişimi ve metaverse çağında adli muhasebe. In M. Mete, E. Akdeniz (Eds.) İktisadi ve idari bilimlerde araştırma ve değerlendirmeler (pp.205-226), Ankara: Gece Publishing.
59. Yu, S., ve Rha, J. (2021). Research trends in accounting fraud using network analysis. Sustainability, 13(10), 55- 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105579.
60. Zan, B. U. (2019). Doğrudan atıf, ortak atıf ve bibliyografik eşleşme yaklaşımlarına dayalı olarak araştırma alanlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 501-516.