AĞIZ İÇİ DİJİTAL TARAYICI İLE ELDE EDİLEN DENTAL MODELLERİN GELENEKSEL ALÇI MODELLER İLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2019, Volume: 46 Issue: 3, 151 - 157, 31.12.2019

Narin Öztürk Okan Akçam

Abstract

Bu çalışmada amacımız, dijital ortodontik modellerin güvenilirliğini test etmek, geleneksel alçı modeller ile boyutsal hassasiyet karşılaştırılmasını yapmaktır. Bu amaçla çalışmamıza 18 ile 25 yaş arasında Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi öğrencisi 20 kız, 10 erkek toplamda 30 birey dahil edilmiştir. 30 bireyden aljinat kullanılarak ölçüleri alınmış ve alçı modelleri elde edilmiştir. Daha sonra Trios (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) ağız içi tarama cihazı kullanılarak 3 boyutlu (3B) dijital modeller oluşturulmuştur. Alçı modeller üzerinde ölçümler dijital bir kumpas ile, dijital modeller üzerinde ölçümler ise OrthoAnalyzer (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) programıyla yapılmıştır. Gruplar arası karşılaştırmada eşleştirilmiş t-testi kullanılmıştır. Tekrarlanabilirlik ve benzerlik değerlendirmeleri için ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) güvenirlik katsayılarından yararlanılmıştır. 3B dijital modeller ile geleneksel alçı modeller ölçümleri arasında ölçülen parametrelerde istatistiksel olarak önemli bir fark saptanmamıştır. UR2-UL2, anterior dental ark uzunluğu ve total ark uzunluğu ölçümlerinde fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olsa da bu fark klinik olarak kabul edilebilir bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak 3B dijital tarama sisteminin geleneksel ağız içi alçı modellerin yerini alabilecek hassasiyete sahip olduğu saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Ortodonti, 3B model, Alçı model

Comparison Of Dental Models Obtained From Intraoral Digital Scanner With Traditional Plaster Models

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the reliability of digital orthodontic models and to compare them with traditional plaster models regarding dimensional accuracy. For this purpose, a total of 30 dental students (20 female,10 male) from Ankara University Faculty of Dental Medicine between 18 and 25 years of age were included. Plaster models were obtained by alginate impressions from 30 subjects. Then, three-dimensional (3D) digital models were created using Trios (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) intraoral scanning device. Measurements were made on plaster models using digital calipers and measurements on 3D digital models were performed with OrthoAnalyzer (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) software. Paired t-test was used for the comparison between two groups. ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients) were used for repeatability and similarity assessments. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3D digital and conventional plaster models. Although the differences in UR2-UL2, anterior dental arch length and total arch length measurements were statistically significant, they were clinically acceptable. As a result, 3D digital scanning system was found tobe adequately precise to replace traditional intraoral plaster models.

Keywords

Orthodontics, 3D model, Plaster model

References

• 1. Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Dijital models: An introduction. Semin Orthod, 2004; 10:226-238.
• 2. Rheude B, Lionel PS, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of dijital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod, 2005; 75:300-304.
• 3. Quimby, ML., Vig, KW., Rashid, RG. and Firestone, AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004; 74, 298–303.
• 4. Tomassetti, JJ., Taloumis, LJ., Denny, JM. and Fischer, JR. Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. The Angle Orthodontist, 2001; 71, 351–357.
• 5. Zilberman O, Huggare JÅ, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod, 2003; 73:301-306.
• 6. Stevens, D.R., Flores-Mir, C., Nebbe, B., Raboud, D.W., Heo, G. and Major, PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006; 129, 794–803
• 7. Mullen, SR., Martin, CA., Ngan, P. and Gladwin, M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007; 132, 346–352.
• 8. Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C and Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependant deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod, 2009; 79: 30- 36.
• 9. Mcguıness Nj, Stephens Cd. Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod, 1992; 19:227-232.
• 10. Grünheid, T., McCarthy, SD., Larson, BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 2014; 146, 673–682
• 11. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12:11-28.
• 12. Reuschl, RP., Heuer, W., Stiesch, M., Wenzel, D., Dittmer, M. P. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006; 38(1), 22–26.
• 13. Westerlund, A., Tancredi, W., Ransjö, M., Bresin, A., Psonis, S., Torgersson, O. Digital casts in orthodontics: A comparison of 4 software systems. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2015; 147, 509–516.
• 14. Torassıan G, Kau Ch, Englısh Jd, Powers J, Bussa Hı, Marie Salas-Lopez A, Corbett Ja. Digital Models Vs Plaster Models Using Alginate And Alginate Substitute Materials. The Angle Orthodontist, 2010; 80(4), 662-669.
• 15. Wiranto, MG., Engelbrecht, WP., Tutein Nolthenius, HE., Van Der Meer, W.J., Ren, Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2013; 143, 140–147