Research Article

Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases

Volume: 75 Number: 1 June 30, 2022
EN TR

Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of Fournier’s gangrene patients who were followed and treated in our clinic. Materials and Methods: In this study, 35 of Fournier’s gangrene patients who were treated between January 2019-October 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients’ results, including age, sex, gangrene localization, mortality rates, comorbidities, laboratory results, and microbiological results, were analyzed. Results: Thirty-four of the patients were male and 1 of them was female. Their mean age was 59.8 years. The duration of hospitalization was 25 days (range between 3-72), only 6 of them required intensive care unit. 2 of them died in this period (mortality: 5.7%). Twenty-four of the patients (65.2%) had hypertension (HT), 22 of them (62.9%) had diabetes mellitus. The mean level of C-reactive protein was 203.3 mg/L. The most influenced parts of the body were the scrotum in 27 patients (77.1%), perianal in 7 patients (20%), and perineal in 1 patient (2.9%). When we looked at the microbiological aspects of the cases, there was polymicrobial flora and Eschericia coli was the leading agent with the rate of 31.9%. All of the patients were followed after making adequate surgical debridement and they all were given the required antibiotic treatment. Local wound care has been done regularly. The additional procedures were required in some patients, which were orchiectomy in 31.4%, colostomy in 22.9%, and reconstruction with skin flap in 28.6%. Conclusion: Fournier’s gangrene is an infectious process that progresses rapidly and can be fatal if not diagnosed and treated early. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in the treatment program.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Etik Kurul Onayı: Çalışma Ankara Şehir Hastanesi Lokal Etik Kurulu tarafından incelenmiş ve oy birliğiyle etik açıdan uygun görülmüştür (etik kurul onay numarası: E1-20-1064). Hasta Onayı: Çalışma geriye dönük analiz olduğundan dolayı hasta onayı alınmamıştır. Hakem Değerlendirmesi: Editörler kurulu ve editörler kurulu dışında olan kişiler tarafından değerlendirilmiştir

References

  1. 1. Chernyadyev SA, Ufimtseva MA, Vishnevskaya IF, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: Literature Review and Clinical Cases. Urol Int. 2018;101:91-97.
  2. 2. Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene. A clinical review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88:157-164.
  3. 3. El-Qushayri AE, Khalaf KM, Dahy A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene mortality: A 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;92:218- 225.
  4. 4. Kuzaka B, Wróblewska MM, Borkowski T, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: Clinical Presentation of 13 Cases. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:548-555.
  5. 5. Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene and its emergency management. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:516-519.
  6. 6. Saifee NH, Evans HL, Magaret AS, et al. Outcomes in necrotizing soft tissue infections treated with therapeutic plasma exchange. Transfusion. 2017;57:1407-1413.
  7. 7. Kincius M, Telksnys T, Trumbeckas D, et al. Evaluation of LRINEC Scale Feasibility for Predicting Outcomes of Fournier Gangrene. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17:448-453.
  8. 8. Montrief T, Long B, Koyfman A, et al. Fournier Gangrene: A Review for Emergency Clinicians. J Emerg Med. 2019;57:488-500.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Urology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

April 5, 2021

Acceptance Date

September 30, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 75 Number: 1

APA
Şenel, S., Uzun, E., Polat, M. E., Karaaslan, M., Kasap, Y., Taştemur, S., & Odabaş, Ö. (2022). Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 75(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016
AMA
1.Şenel S, Uzun E, Polat ME, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2022;75(1):119-123. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016
Chicago
Şenel, Samet, Emre Uzun, Muhammed Emin Polat, et al. 2022. “Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-Five Cases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 75 (1): 119-23. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016.
EndNote
Şenel S, Uzun E, Polat ME, Karaaslan M, Kasap Y, Taştemur S, Odabaş Ö (June 1, 2022) Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 75 1 119–123.
IEEE
[1]S. Şenel et al., “Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 119–123, June 2022, doi: 10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016.
ISNAD
Şenel, Samet - Uzun, Emre - Polat, Muhammed Emin - Karaaslan, Mustafa - Kasap, Yusuf - Taştemur, Sedat - Odabaş, Öner. “Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-Five Cases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 75/1 (June 1, 2022): 119-123. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016.
JAMA
1.Şenel S, Uzun E, Polat ME, Karaaslan M, Kasap Y, Taştemur S, Odabaş Ö. Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2022;75:119–123.
MLA
Şenel, Samet, et al. “Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-Five Cases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 75, no. 1, June 2022, pp. 119-23, doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016.
Vancouver
1.Samet Şenel, Emre Uzun, Muhammed Emin Polat, Mustafa Karaaslan, Yusuf Kasap, Sedat Taştemur, Öner Odabaş. Fournier’s Gangrene Experience: Retrospective Analysis of Thirty-five Cases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2022 Jun. 1;75(1):119-23. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03016