Research Article

Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri

Volume: 74 Number: 1 April 30, 2021
Didem Rota *, Fatma Efsun Tanacan , Oğulcan İbiş , Özge Gündüz , Fatma Gülru Erdoğan , Aysel Gürler
EN TR

Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to share our data on Behçet’s disease (BD) collected in the last fourteen years (demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients) and to update our knowledge on BD by comparing it with the results of similar studies conducted in our country. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted by examining the clinical and demographic characteristics of a total 197 patients, including 111 females and 86 males, who were admitted to the Ufuk University Dermatology and Venereal Diseases Polyclinic between January 2006 and January 2020 and who were diagnosed with BD according to the International BD Study Group Criteria (IBSG) and taken into the follow-up system in our BD Center. Results: One hundred eleven female and eighty-six male patients between the ages of 16 and 65 years were included in the study. The ratio of 10 men/women in patients was 0.77. The mean age of the patients at the time of presentation was 37.38±13.91 years, and the mean age at onset of disease was 27.07±9.77 years. Oral aphthae were observed in 100% of the patients because the IBSG criteria were used. Family history was positive in 20.8%. Genital ulcer was detected in 71%, erythema nodosum in 43.6% and papulopustular lesions in 54.3%. Pathergy test was positive in 42.6% of the patients. Eye involvement was detected in 38.8% of the patients, articular in 21.3%, vascular in 7.6%, gastrointestinal in 0.5% and pulmonary in 1.5%. Conclusion: BD is a multisystemic disease, morbidity of which can be reduced and mortality of which can be prevented with early diagnosis and treatment. Due to the high prevalence in our country and the fact that it is a disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach, the number of experienced centers that will deal with the disease in every aspect should be increased. Key Words: Behçet’s Disease, Clinic, Demographic Features

Keywords

Behçet’s Disease, Clinic, Demographic Features

References

  1. 1. Gürler A, Boyvat A, Türsen U. Clinical manifestations of Behçet’s disease: an analysis of 2147 patients. Yonsei Med J. 1997;38:423-427.
  2. 2. Tursen U, Gurler A, Boyvat A. Evaluation of clinical findings according to sex in 2313 Turkish patients with Behçet’s disease. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:346- 351.
  3. 3. Azizlerli G, Köse AA, Sarica R, et al. Prevalence of Behçet’s disease in Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:803-806.
  4. 4. Fernández-Ávila DG, Rincón-Riaño DN, Bernal-Macías S, et al. Prevalence and demographic characteristics of Behcet disease in Colombia: data from the national health registry 2012-2016. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:17-20.
  5. 5. Demirhindi O, Yazıcı H, Binyıldız P, et al. Silivri Fener Köyü ve yöresinde Behçet hastalığı sıklığı ve bu hastalığın toplum içinde taranmasında kullanılabilecek bir yöntem. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fak Derg. 1981;12:509-514.
  6. 6. Yurdakul S, Günaydin I, Tüzün Y, et al. The prevalence of Behçet’s syndrome in a rural area in northern Turkey. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:820-822.
  7. 7. Idil A, Gürler A, Boyvat A, et al. The prevalence of Behçet’s disease above the age of 10 years. The results of a pilot study conducted at the Park Primary Health Care Center in Ankara, Turkey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9:325- 331.
  8. 8. Cakir N, Dervis E, Benian O, et al. Prevalence of Behçet’s disease in rural western Turkey: a preliminary report. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22:53-55.
  9. 9. Çölgeçen E, Özyurt K, Ferahbaş A, et al. The prevalence of Behçet’s disease in a city in Central Anatolia in Turkey. Int J Dermatol. 2015;54:286-289.
  10. 10. Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease. Lancet. 1990;335:1078-1080.
APA
Rota, D., Tanacan, F. E., İbiş, O., Gündüz, Ö., Erdoğan, F. G., & Gürler, A. (2021). Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 74(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371
AMA
1.Rota D, Tanacan FE, İbiş O, Gündüz Ö, Erdoğan FG, Gürler A. Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021;74(1):60-67. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371
Chicago
Rota, Didem, Fatma Efsun Tanacan, Oğulcan İbiş, Özge Gündüz, Fatma Gülru Erdoğan, and Aysel Gürler. 2021. “Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik Ve Demografik Özellikleri”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74 (1): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371.
EndNote
Rota D, Tanacan FE, İbiş O, Gündüz Ö, Erdoğan FG, Gürler A (April 1, 2021) Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74 1 60–67.
IEEE
[1]D. Rota, F. E. Tanacan, O. İbiş, Ö. Gündüz, F. G. Erdoğan, and A. Gürler, “Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 60–67, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371.
ISNAD
Rota, Didem - Tanacan, Fatma Efsun - İbiş, Oğulcan - Gündüz, Özge - Erdoğan, Fatma Gülru - Gürler, Aysel. “Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik Ve Demografik Özellikleri”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74/1 (April 1, 2021): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371.
JAMA
1.Rota D, Tanacan FE, İbiş O, Gündüz Ö, Erdoğan FG, Gürler A. Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021;74:60–67.
MLA
Rota, Didem, et al. “Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik Ve Demografik Özellikleri”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 74, no. 1, Apr. 2021, pp. 60-67, doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371.
Vancouver
1.Didem Rota, Fatma Efsun Tanacan, Oğulcan İbiş, Özge Gündüz, Fatma Gülru Erdoğan, Aysel Gürler. Yüz Doksan Yedi Behçet Hastasının Klinik ve Demografik Özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021 Apr. 1;74(1):60-7. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.03371