Has Minimal Invasive Surgery Caused Alterations in Open Surgical Techniques?
Abstract
Objectives: Some of the methods, which were routinely used in traditional open surgical techniques, have vanished nowadays as a result of technical and technological improvements. The aim of this study is to interrogate the responses of the surgeons who have different specialties but work on similar areas of the body to these technical alterations, and the feasibility of these methods in open surgery.
Materials and Methods: The study included 90 pediatric surgeons, urologists and general surgeons. A questionnaire was developed asking about the changes that the surgeons faced since first performing endoscopic surgery.
Results: The pediatric surgeons changed the accustomed surgical principles in six procedures (73%). Alterations of the urologists were in three pathologies (61%) and four pathologies (72%) in general surgeons. Eighty-six percent of pediatric surgeons, 27% of urologists and 40% of general surgeons were using these alterations of endoscopic techniques in open surgery as well.
Conclusion: In this study minimal invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have changed some of the accustomed surgical principles of open surgery. MIS were misevaluated as being close techniques to open surgeries, yet they are in fact a separate branch of surgery, which have many unique technical features. This approach may cause additional changes in open techniques by developing supportive and innovative aspects of MIS.
Keywords
Laparoscopy, Child, Surgery, Urology, General Surgery
Ethical Statement
No patients were used in the study. It is a survey. Therefore, there is no need to get approval from the ethics committee.
References
- 1. Morgental CB, Richards WO, Dunkin BJ, et al. The role of the surgeon in the evolution of flexible endoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2007;21:838-853.
- 2. Robert KE, Bell RL, Duffy AJ. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3219-3224.
- 3. Furriel FT, Laguna MP, Figueiredo AJ, et al. Training of European urology residents in laparoscopy: results of a pan-European survey. BJU Int. 2013;112:1223-1228.
- 4. De Win G, Everaerts W, De Ridder D, et al. Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and general surgery residents. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:55-63.
- 5. Cohen RC, Ostlie DJ. 25(th) Anniversary state-of-the-art expert discussion with Ralph C. Cohen, MBBS, BMedSci, MS, FRACS, on the advances of surgical practice in pediatric urology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:455-459.
- 6. Merriam, Sharan B; Learning in Adulthood. In: Rosemary S. Caffarella, Lisa M. Baumgartner, Editors. A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass; 2007. p423-424.
- 7. Ota C, DiCarlo CF, Burts DC, et al. Training and the needs of adult learners. The Journal of Extension. 2006;44:tt5.
- 8. Parray FQ. Minimal access maximal success; a myth or a reality. Int J Surg. 2012;10:178-181.
- 9. Chan B, Martel G, Poulin EC, et al. Resident training in minimally invasive surgery: a survey of Canadian department and division chairs. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:499-503.
- 10. Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, et al. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1-79.